Finite-time experiment design with multisines

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 17, Issue 1 PART 1, 2008, Pages

  Bombois, Xavier ^a   Barenthin, Märta ^a   Van Den Hof, Paul M J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Identification for control; Input and excitation design

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENT DESIGN; IDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL; INPUT AND EXCITATION DESIGN; INPUT SIGNAL; MULTISINE; NUMBER OF DATUM; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENT DESIGN; SMALL DATA SET; TRANSIENT EFFECT;

DESIGN; EXPERIMENTS; MODEL STRUCTURES;

IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 79961018277     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.1715     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. X. Bombois and M. Gilson. Cheapest identification experiment with guaranteed accuracy in the presence of undermodeling. In 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Newcastle, 2006.
2. X. Bombois, G. Scorletti, M. Gevers, P. Van den Hof, and R. Hildebrand. Least costly identification experiment for control. Automatica, 42(10):1651-1662, 2006.
3. G.C. Goodwin and R.L. Payne. Dynamic system identification. Experiment design and data analysis. Academic Press, 1977.
4. P. Heuberger, P. Van den Hof, and B. Walhberg (Eds). Modelling and Identification with Rational Orthogonal Basis Functions. Springer Verlag, 2005.
5. H. Jansson. Experiment design with applications in Identification for Control. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.
6. H. Jansson and H. Hjalmarsson. Input design via LMIs admitting frequency-wise model specifications in confidence regions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 50(10):1534-1549, October 2005.
7. L. Ljung. System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1999.
8. R. Pintelon and J. Schoukens. System Identification - A Frequency Domain Approach. IEEE Press, New York, 2001.