Intervention of biofilms in wound healing process;Interferencia de las biopelículas en el proceso de curación de heridas

Dermatologia Revista Mexicana

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 127-139

  Rivera, Laura Estela Castrillón ^a   Ramos, Alejandro Palma ^a   Desgarennes, María del Carmen Padilla ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE SISTEMAS BIOLÓGICOS   (Mexico)

^b SECRETARÍA DE SALUD   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Biofilms; Wound healing; Wounds

Indexed keywords

BIOFILM; ENVIRONMENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; REVIEW; SKIN DEFECT; SKIN FLORA; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 79960991983     PISSN: 01854038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Sephel CG, Woodward CS. Reparación, regeneración y fibrosis. En: Rubin: Patología estructual. Fundamentos clinicopatológicos en medicina. Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 2006;Cap.3:79-108.
2. Deodhar AK, Rana RE. Surgical physiology of wound healing: a review. J Postgrad Med 1997;43:52-56.
3. Schultz SG, Davidson MJ, Kirsner SR, Bornstein P, Herman MI. Dynamic reciprocity in the wound environment. Wound Rep Reg 2011;19:134-148.
4. Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K, Ostrup JP, Madsen GK, et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Rep Reg 2008:16:2-10.
5. Bendy RH, Nuccio PA, Wolfe E, Collins B, et al. Relationship of quantitative wound bacterial counts to healing of decubiti. Effect of topical gentamincin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1964;4:147-155.
6. Robson MC, Heggers JP. Bacterial quantification of open wounds. Mill Med 1969;134:19-24.
7. Peña G. El proceso de curación efectiva en heridas y lesiones contaminadas. Racionalización de las alternativas de tratamiento en la actualidad. Rev Med Hond 2003;71:143-149.
8. White R, Cutting KF, Kingsley A. Critical colonization: clinical reality or myth? Wounds UK 2005;1:94-95.
9. Phillips P, Sampson E, Yang Q, Antonelli P. Bacterial biofilms in wounds. Wound Healing Southern Africa 2008;1:10-12.
10. O'Brian M. Knowledge: Understanding critical colonization of wounds. Nursuring Times 2007;103:48-50.
11. Georgiade G. Wound contamination. Assessment, prevention and management. Postgrad Med 1983;73:247-254.
12. Widegrow AD. Persistence of the chronic wound-implicating biofilm. Wound Healing Southern Africa 2008;1:5-7.
13. Majewski WZ, Cybulski MN, Pukacki F, Staniszewski RK, et al. The value of quantitative bacteriological investigations in the monitoring of treatment of ischaemic ulcerations of lower legs. Int Angiol 1995;14:381-384.
14. Gontcharova V, Youn Eunseog, Sun Y, Wolcott DR, Dowd ES. A comparison of bacterial composition in diabetic ulcers and contralateral intact skin. Open Microbiol J 2010;4:8-19.
15. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong G. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:244-269.
16. Martin MJo, Zenilman MJ, Lazarus SG. Molecular microbiology: New dimensions for cutaneous biology and wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 2010;130:38-48.
17. Bowel PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong GD. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:244-269.
18. Percival LS, Bowler P, Phil M, Woods JE. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms. Wound Rep Reg 2008;16:52-57.
19. Malic S, Hioll EK, Hayes A, Percival LS, et al. Detection and identification of specific bacteria in wound biofilms using peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridation (PNA FISH). Microbiology 2009;155:2603-2611.
20. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, Rhoads DD, et al. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:43.
21. Thomsen TR, Aaholm MS Rudkjobing VB, Saunders AM, et al. The bacteriology of chronic venous leg ulcer examined by culture-independent molecular methods. Wounds Rep Reg 2010;18:38-49.
22. Costerton JW, Veeh R, Shirtliff M, Pasmote M, et al. The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections. J Clin Invest 2003;112:1466-1477.
23. Burmolle M, Thomsen RT, Fazli M, Dige I, et al. Biofilms in chronic infections -a matter of opportunity- monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010;59:324-336.
24. Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 2002;184:1140-1154.
25. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nature Rev Microbiol 2010;8:623-633.
26. Stewart SP, Franklin JM. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nature Microbiology 2008;6:199-210.
27. Donlan MR. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerging Infect Dis 2002;8:881-890.
28. nd ed. Nueva York: Stony Brook Plenum Press; 2007:3-35.
29. Castrillón RLE, Palma RA, Padilla DMC. Importancia de las biopelículas en la práctica médica. Dermatología Rev Mex 2010;54:14-24.
30. Gristina AG, Price JL, Hobgood CD, Webb LX, Costerton JW. Bacterial colonization of percutaneous suture. Surgery 1985;98:12-19.
31. Wolcott R, Cutting FK, Dowd ES. Surgical site infections: biofilms, dehiscence and delayed healing. Wounds UK 2008;4:108-113.
32. James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Rep Regen 2008;16:37-44.
33. Dow G, Browne A, Sibbaload RG. Infection in chronic wounds: controversies in diagnosis and treatment. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999;45:23-40.
34. Percival LS, Thomas GJ, Williams WD. Biofilms and bacterial imbalances in chronic wounds: anti-Koch. Int Wound J 2010;7:169-175.
35. Davis CS, Ricotti C, Cazzaniga A, Welsh E, et al. Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo. Wound Rep Reg 2008;16:23-29.
36. Nakagami G, Sanada H, Sugaqma J, Morohoshi T, et al. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing signals in an infected ischemic wound: an experimental study in rats. Wound Rep Regen 2008;16:30-36.
37. Rickard AH, Colacino KR, Manton KM. Production of cell-cell signaling molecules by bacteria isolated from human chronic wounds. J Appl Microbiol 2009;108:1509-1522.
38. Kikertrep-Moller K, Jensen PO, Fazi M, Madsen KG, et al. Distribution, organization and ecology of bacteria in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2717-2722.
39. Fazli M, Bjarnsholt T, Kikertrep-Moller K, Jensen PO, et al. Non-random distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococccus aureus in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:4084-4089.
40. Cooper R. Biofilms and wounds: much ado about nothing? Wounds UK 2010:84-90.
41. Cooper R, Okhiria O. Biofilms, wound infection and the issue control. Wounds UK 2006;2:48-57.
42. Thomson HC. Biofilms: do they affect wound healing? Int Wound J 2011;8:63-67.
43. Cooper R, Cutting K, Romanelli M. Biofilms and the role of debridement in chronic wounds. Wounds UK 2010;6:160-166.
44. Sinha SN. Wound debridement: doing and teaching. Primary Intention 2007;15:162-164.
45. Van der Plas MJA, Jukema GN, Wai1 Sin-Wen, Dogterom-Ballering HCM, et al. Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:117-122.
46. Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Pascual MA. Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial biofilms. Rev Med Microbiol 2006;17:65-75.
47. Stewart SP, Costerton WJ. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001;358:135-138.
48. Lu TK, Collins JJ. Dispersing biofilms with engineered enzymatic bacteriophage. PNAS 2007;104:11197-11202.
49. Kaplan BJ, Ragunath C, Velliyagounder K, Fine HD, Ramasubbu N. Enzymatic detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48: 2633-2636.
50. Singh PK, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP, Welsh MJ. A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development. Nature 2002;417(6888):552-555.
51. Ramussen TB, Bjarnsholt T, Skindersoe M.Screening for quorum sensing inhibitors (QSI) by use a novel genetic system, the QSI selector. J Bacteriology 2005;187:1799-1814.
52. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD. A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects with critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care 2008;17:145-155.
53. Merckoll P, Jonassen TO, Vad ME, Jeansson SL, Melby KK. Bacteria biofilm and honey: A study of the effects of the honey on 'planktonic' and biofilm-embeded wound bacteria. Scand J Infect Dis 2009;41:341-347.
54. Alandejani T, Marsan J, Ferris W, Slinger R, Chan F. Effectiveness of honey on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Otolarynol Head Neck Surg 2009;139:107-111.
55. Nuryastuti T, Van der Mei HC, Busscher JH, Iravati S, et al. Effect of cinnamon oil on icaA expression and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:6850-6855.
56. Smyth AR, Cifelli PM, Ortori CA, Righetti K, et al. Garlic as an inhibitor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing in cystic fibrosis-a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2010;45:356-62.
57. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds of the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962;193:293-294.
58. Natarajan S, Williamson D, Stiltz JA, Harding K. Avances en el cuidado de las heridas y tecnología de cicatrización. Am J Clin Dermatol 2002;1:7-13.
59. Anzai T, Shiratori A, Ohtomo E. Evaluation of clinical utility of NI-009 on various cutaneous ulcers. Comparative study with base. J Clin Ther Med 1989;5:2575-612.
60. Chaw KC, Manimaran M, Tay FE. Role of silver ions in destabilization of intermolecular adhesion forces measured by atomic force microscopy in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4853-4859.
61. Cutting FK. Addressing the challenge of wound cleasing in the modern era. Br J Nursing 2010;19:S24-S29.
62. Witte BM, Marbul A. Role of nitric oxide in wound repair. Am J Surg 2002;183:406-412.
63. Fang CF. Mechanisms of nitric oxide-related antimicrobial activity. J Clin Invest 1997;99:2818-2825.