Ecological consequences of variation in standard metabolism and dominance among salmon parr

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 371-376

  Armstrong, John D ^a   Millidine, Karen J ^a,b   Metcalfe, Neil B ^b  

^a MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Atlantic salmon; Energy budget; Growth; Models; Salmo salar; Standard metabolic rate; Water velocity

Indexed keywords

SALMO SALAR;

EID: 79960991873     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: 16000633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2011.00486.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alanärä, A., Burns, M.D. & Metcalfe, N.B. 2001. Intraspecific resource partitioning in brown trout: the temporal distribution of foraging is determined by social rank. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 980-986.
2. Álvarez, D. & Nicieza, A.G. 2005. Is metabolic rate a reliable predictor of growth and survival of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the wild? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 62: 643-649.
3. Armstrong, J.D. & Hawkins, L.A. 2008. Standard metabolic rate of pike, Esox lucius: variation among studies and implications for energy flow modeling. Hydrobiologia 601: 83-90.
4. Armstrong, J.D., Kemp, P., Kennedy, G., Ladle, M. & Milner, N. 2003. Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams. Fisheries Research 62: 143-170.
5. Bennett, A.F. & Ruben, J.A. 1979. Endothermy and activity in vertebrates. Science 206: 649-654.
6. Brett, J.R. 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 21: 1183-1226.
7. Brett, J.R. & Groves, T.D.D. 1979. Physiological energetics. In: Hoar, W.S., Randall, D.J. & Brett, J.R., eds. Fish Physiology. Volume VIII: Bioenergetics and Growth. London: Academic Press, pp. 280-352.
8. Carter, C.G., Houlihan, D.F., Keissling, A., Medale, F. & Jobling, M. 2001. Physiological effects of feeding. In: Houlihan, D., Boujard, T. & Jobling, M., eds. Food Intake in Fish. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, pp. 297-331.
9. Cutts, C.J., Metcalfe, N.B. & Taylor, A.C. 2002. Juvenile Atlantic salmon with relatively high standard metabolic rates have small metabolic scopes. Functional Ecology 16: 73-78.
10. Elliott, J.M. 2002. Shadow competition in wild juvenile sea trout. Journal of Fish Biology 61: 1268-1281.
11. Grant, J.W.A. & Imre, I. 2005. Patterns of density-dependent growth in juvenile stream-dwelling salmonids. Journal of Fish Biology, 67(Suppl. B): 100-110.
12. Griffiths, S.W. & Armstrong, J.D. 2001. The benefits of genetic diversity outweigh those of kin association in a territorial animal. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 268: 1293-1296.
13. Harwood, A.J., Armstrong, J.D., Metcalfe, N.B. & Griffiths, S.W. 2003. Does dominance status correlate with growth in wild stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)? Behavioral Ecology 14: 902-908.
14. Hill, J. & Grossman, G.D. 1993. An energetic model of microhabitat use for rainbow trout and rosyside dace. Ecology 74: 685-698.
15. Huntingford, F.A. & Turner, A.K. 1987. Animal Conflict. London: Chapman & Hall.
16. Jenkins, T.M., Diehl, S., Kratz, K.W. & Cooper, S.D. 1999. Effects of population density on individual growth of brown trout in streams. Ecology 80: 941-956.
17. Koch, F. & Wieser, W. 1983. Partitioning of energy in fish: can reduction of swimming activity compensate for the cost of production. Journal of Experimental Biology 107: 141-146.
18. Maclean, A., Huntingford, F.A., Ruxton, G.D. & Armstrong, J.D. 2005. Testing the assumptions of the ideal despotic distribution with an unpredictable food supply: experiments in juvenile salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 214-225.
19. Martin-Smith, K. & Armstrong, J.D. 2002. Growth rates of wild stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon correlate with activity and sex but not dominance. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 413-423.
20. McCarthy, I.D. 2000. Temporal repeatability of relative standard metabolic rate in juvenile Atlantic salmon and its relation to life history variation. Journal of Fish Biology 57: 224-238.
21. McCormick, M.I. 1998. Behaviorally induced maternal stress in a fish influences progeny quality by a hormonal mechanism. Ecology 79: 1873-1883.
22. Metcalfe, N.B., Taylor, A.C. & Thorpe, J.E. 1995. Metabolic rate, social status and life-history strategies in Atlantic salmon. Animal Behaviour 49: 431-436.
23. Millidine, K.J., Armstrong, J.D. & Metcalfe, N.B. 2009. Juvenile salmon with high standard metabolic rates have higher energy costs but can process meals faster. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 276: 2103-2108.
24. Nakano, S. 1995. Individual-Differences in Resource Use, Growth and Emigration Under the Influence of A Dominance Hierarchy in Fluvial Red-Spotted Masu Salmon in A Natural Habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 75-84.
25. Nilsson, P.A., Huntingford, F.A. & Armstrong, J.D. 2004. Using the functional response to determine the nature of unequal interference among foragers. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B 271(Suppl. 5): S334-S337.
26. Nislow, K.H., Folt, C.L. & Parrish, D.L. 1999. Favorable foraging locations for young Atlantic salmon: application to habitat and population restoration. Ecological Applications 9: 1085-1099.
27. O'Connor, K.I., Taylor, A.C. & Metcalfe, N.B. 2000. The stability of standard metabolic rate during a period of food deprivation in juvenile Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 57: 41-51.
28. Secor, S.M. 2009. Specific dynamic action: a review of the postprandial response. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 179: 1-56.
29. Sloman, K.A. 2010. Exposure of ova to cortisol pre-fertilisation affects subsequent behaviour and physiology of brown trout. Hormones and Behaviour 58: 433-439.
30. Sloman, K.A. & Armstrong, J.D. 2002. Physiological effects of dominance hierarchies: laboratory artifacts or natural phenomena? Journal of Fish Biology 61: 1-23.
31. Windell, J.T. 1978. Estimating food consumption rates of fish populations. In: Bagenal, T., (ed). Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Freshwater. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 227-254.