Physical limitations to efficient high-speed spin-torque switching in magnetic tunnel junctions

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Heindl, R ^a   Rippard, W H ^a   Russek, S E ^a   Kos, A B ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960977998     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.054430     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J. C. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. JMMMDC 0304-8853 10.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 159, L1 (1996).
2. L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B JMMMDC 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353 54, 9353 (1996).
3. J. A. Katine and E. E. Fullerton, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. JMMMDC 0304-8853 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.013 320, 1217 (2008).
4. S. Ikeda, J. Hayakawa, Y. M. Lee, F. Matsukura, Y. Ohno, T. Hanyu, and H. Ohno, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices IETDAI 0018-9383 10.1109/TED.2007.894617 54, 991 (2007). (Pubitemid 46691554)
5. S. Ikeda, K. Miura, H. Yamamoto, K. Mizunuma, H. D. Gan, M. Endo, S. Kanai, J. Hayakawa, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Nat. Mater. 1476-1122 10.1038/nmat2804 9, 721 (2010).
6. D. C. Worledge, G. Hu, D. W. Abraham, J. Z. Sun, P. L. Trouilloud, J. Nowak, S. Brown, M. C. Gaidis, E. J. O'Sullivan, and R. P. Robertazzi, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.3536482 98, 022501 (2011).
7. E. Chen, D. Apalkov, Z. Diao, A. Driskill-Smith, D. Druist, D. Lottis, V. Nikitin, X. Tang, S. Watts, S. Wang, S. A. Wolf, A. W. Ghosh, J. W. Lu, S. J. Poon, M. Stan, W. H. Butler, S. Gupta, C. K. A. Mewes, T. Mewes, and P. B. Visscher, IEEE Trans. Magn. IEMGAQ 0018-9464 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2042041 46, 1873 (2010).
8. K. Lee and S. Kang, IEEE Trans. Magn. IEMGAQ 0018-9464 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2043645 46, 1537 (2010).
9. 0 in the simulations was determined by extrapolating switching currents to T = 0 K and infinite switching time.
10. L. Z. Diao, Z. S. Wang, Y. Ding, A. Panchula, E. Chen, L.-C. Wang, and Y. Huai, J. Phys. Condens. Matter JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/19/16/165209 19, 5209 (2007). (Pubitemid 46595090)
11. T. Min, Q. Chen, R. Beach, G. Jan, C. Horng, W. Kula, T. Torng, R. Tong, T. Zhong, D. Tang, P. Wang, M.-M. Chen, J. Z. Sun, J. K. Debrosse, D. C. Worledge, T. M. Maffitt, and W. J. Gallagher, IEEE Trans. Magn. IEMGAQ 0018-9464 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2043069 46, 2322 (2010).
12. D. C. Worledge, in 2010 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (2010).
13. M. Schäfers, V. Drewello, G. Reiss, A. Thomas, K. Thiel, G. Eilers, M. Münzenberg, H. Schuhmann, and M. Seibt, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.3272268 95, 232119 (2009).
14. A. A. Khan, J. Schmalhorst, A. Thomas, O. Schebaum, and G. Reiss, J. Appl. Phys. JAPIAU 0021-8979 10.1063/1.2939571 103, 123705 (2008).
15. Q. Chen, T. Min, T. Torng, C. Horng, D. Tang, and P. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 0021-8979 10.1063/1.3074508 105, 07C931 (2009).
16. B is Boltzmanns constant, and T is the device temperature.
17. J. Z. Sun, Phys. Rev. B JAPIAU 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.570 62, 570 (2000).
18. L. Liu, T. Moriyama, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.3107262 94, 122508 (2009).
19. The details of the experimental setup will be published elsewhere. The pulse rise time was 100 ps.
20. Wafers with starting thin film stack were prepared by Singulus Technologies Inc, [http://www.singulus.de/en.html]. The ion milling was stopped at the MgO barrier, meaning that only the free ferromagnetic layer is patterned. Wafer level current-in-plane-tunneling (CIPT) measurements and measurements on processed devices give resistance-area (RA) products of 3 Ω μ m 2 and tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) ratios of about 60 %. The devices have elliptical shapes with an aspect ratio of 3 to 1 and sizes ranging from 50 × 150 nm to 80 × 240 nm. For the device with Δ = 42, the average resistance is R 510 Ω. Devices from other wafers with RA products ranging up to 25 Ω μ m 2, with various sizes, compositions, and thermal stability factors also are in agreement with the conclusions presented here.
21. S. E. Russek, S. Kaka, W. H. Rippard, M. R. Pufall, and T. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. B APPLAB 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.104425 71, 104425 (2005). (Pubitemid 40781304)
22. All simulations start after a 10-ns wait time to allow the system to reach the equilibrium. Pulse rise and fall times are 100 ps.
23. W. H. Butler, in Proceedings of the 55th MMM Conference, Atlanta (2010).
24. T. Devolder, C. Chappert, and K. Ito, Phys. Rev. B APPLAB 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.224430 75, 224430 (2007).
25. K. Roy, S. Bandyopadhyay, and J. Atulasimha, e-print arXiv: 1012.0819v1.
26. F. B. Mancoff, R. W. Dave, N. D. Rizzo, T. C. Eschrich, B. N. Engel, and S. Tehrani, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.1604936 83, 1596 (2003).