Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: Robot-assisted versus retropubic

European Urology

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 413-419

  Kim, Seong Cheol ^b   Song, Cheryn ^a   Kim, Wansuk ^a   Kang, Taejin ^a   Park, Jinsung ^c   Jeong, In Gab ^a   Lee, Sangmi ^a   Cho, Yong Mee ^a   Ahn, Hanjong ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Eulji University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Robotics

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHODIESTERASE V INHIBITOR; TESTOSTERONE;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PENIS ERECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TESTOSTERONE BLOOD LEVEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE ERECTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TESTOSTERONE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 79960973488     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lughezzani G, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2010;58:687-700.
2. Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, Walsh PC. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol 2004;171:23-6. (Pubitemid 37549081)
3. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92:205-10. (Pubitemid 36966578)
4. Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2009;104:991-5.
5. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009;104:534-9.
6. Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011;59:1-6.
7. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 2011;59:61-71.
8. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming IR, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. ed. 6 New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
9. Epstein JI, Amin M, Boccon-Gibod L, et al. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 2005;216:34-63.
10. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992;148:331-7.
11. Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H. Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007;178:208-11. (Pubitemid 46898488)
12. Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su LM, et al. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int 2011;107:1956-62.
13. Vickers A, Savage C, Bianco F, et al. Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center. Eur Urol 2011;59:317-22.
14. Wei JT, Dunn RL, Marcovich R, Montie JE, Sanda MG. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000;164:744-8. (Pubitemid 30637615)
15. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, et al. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 2000;283:354-60. (Pubitemid 30051753)
16. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, et al. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010;184:1028-33.
17. Tan GY, El Douaihy Y, Te AE, Tewari AK. Scientific and technical advances in continence recovery following radical prostatectomy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009;6:431-53.
18. Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2008;179:1907-11.
19. Kagebayashi Y, Fukui S, Torimoto K, Samma S. Usefulness of thickness of the pelvic floor muscle as a predictor for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Hinyokika Kiyo 2010;56:147-50.
20. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 2004;94:1071-6. (Pubitemid 39577096)
21. Martinez-Jabaloyas JM, Queipo-Zaragoza A, Pastor-Hernandez F, Gil-Salom M, Chuan-Nuez P. Testosterone levels in men with erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 2006;97:1278-83. (Pubitemid 43907337)
22. Gacci M, Corona G, Apolone G, et al. Influence of serum testosterone on urinary continence and sexual activity in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010;13:168-72.
23. Khera M. Androgens and erectile function: a case for early androgen use in postprostatectomy hypogonadal men. J Sex Med 2009;6(Suppl 3):234-8.
24. Nandipati KC, Raina R, Agarwal A, Zippe CD. Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management. Drugs Aging 2006;23:101-17.
25. Khera M. Androgen replacement therapy after prostate cancer treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2010;11:393-9.
26. Finley DS, Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing. BJU Int 2009;104:1484-9.
27. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel MB, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 2009;104:1428-35.
28. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037-63.
29. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel VR. Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:1022-9.
30. Sharma NL, Papadopoulos A, Lee D, et al. First 500 cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from a single UK centre: learning curves of two surgeons. BJU Int. In press. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X. 2010.09941.x.