Developing a metadata element set for organizing literary works: A survey of the American literary communityt

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 262-277

  Paling, Stephen ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960955697     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2011-3-262     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adkins, Denice and Bossaller, Jenny E. 2007. Fiction access points across computer-mediated book information sources: a comparison of online bookstores, reader advisory databases, and public library catalogs. Library & information science research 29:354-68.
2. Albrechtsen, Hanne and Jacob, Elin K. 1998. The dynamics of classification systems as boundary objects for cooperation in the electronic library. Library trends 47 n2:293-312. (Pubitemid 128364422)
3. American Library Association. 2000. Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc. 2nd ed. Chicago: American Library Association.
4. Beghtol, Clare 1994. The classification of fiction: the development of a system based theoretical principles. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
5. Bogan, Ruth, DeSio, Sandra M., Gabel, Linda, Gilchrist, Jane, Hearn, Stephen, Hoffman, Shannon, et al. (2003). Final report of SAC Subcommittee on Fiction Guidelines. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved January 12 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/mgrps/ccs/cmtes/sac/inact/ fictionguideline/SACFicGuide FinalRpt.doc.
6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. The rules of art: genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
7. Chan, Lois Mai. 2005. Library of Congress subject headings: Principles and applications 4th ed. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
8. Greenberg, Jane. 2004. User comprehension and searching with information retrieval thesauri. Cataloging & classification quarterly 37 n3/4:103-20. (Pubitemid 38707706)
9. Hoffman, Frederick J., Allen, Charles, and Ulrich, Carolyn F. (1947). The little magazine: a history and bibliography. Princeton: Princeton University.
10. Kling, Rob. 1999. What is Social Informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib 5. Retrieved September 12, 2006, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/kling/ 01kling.html.
11. OCLC. 2010. FictionFinder is on hiatus. Retrieved July 7, 2010, from http://fictionfinder.oclc.org/.
12. Paling, Stephen. 2004. Classification, rhetoric, and the classificatory horizon. Library trends 52 n3:588-603. (Pubitemid 38789446)
13. Paling, Stephen. 2008. Technology, genres, and value change: literary authors and aesthetic use of information technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Scienceand Technology 59:1238-51.
14. Paling, Stephen. 2009. Mapping techno-literary spaces: adapting multiple correspondence analysis for literature and art informatics. Information research 14 v2. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://informationr.net/ir/14-2/paper401. html.
15. Paling, Stephen and Nilan, Michael. 2006. Technology, values, and genre change: the case of little magazines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57:862-72. (Pubitemid 43734454)
16. Paling, Stephen and Martin, Crystle. 2009. Transformative use of information technology in american literary writing: A survey of literary community members. Paper presented at the Social Informatics Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vancouver, BC.
17. Ross, Catherine S. 2001. Making choices: what readers have to say about choosing books to read for pleasure. The acquisitions librarian 13 n25:5-21.
18. Ross, Catherine S., and Chelton, Mary K. 2001. Reader's advisory: matching mood and material. Library journal 126 n2:52-55. (Pubitemid 33224290)
19. Ross, Trevor. 1997. "Pure poetry": cultural capital and the rejection of classicism. Modern language quarterly 58:437-56.
20. Saarti, Jarmo. 1992. Experiments with categorizing fiction in Lohtaja Library. Scandinavian public library quarterly 25 n4:22-24.
21. Saarti, Jarmo. 1999. Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri. Journal of librarianship and information science 31 n2:85-92.
22. Sapp, Gregg. 1986. The levels of access: subject approaches to fiction. RQ 25:489-97.
23. Tillett, Barbara B. 2003. What is FRBR? A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe. Washington, D. C.: Library of Congress.
24. U. S. Census Bureau. 2008. Population estimates. Retrieved November 29, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2008/NC-EST2008-01. xls.
25. Yee, Martha M. 1994. What is a work? Part 1: The user and the objects of the catalog. Cataloging & classification quarterly 19 n1:9-28.