Technology, genres, and value change: Literary authors and artistic use of information technology

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1238-1251

  Paling, Stephen ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

(OTDR) TECHNOLOGY; CENTRAL CONTROL; COMMERCIAL SETTINGS; CREATIVE (CO); HUMAN ACTORS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USE;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 45849097155     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20822     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agre, P.E. (2002). Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18, 311-331.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
4. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254.
5. Clay, S., & Phillips, R. (1998). A secret location on the Lower East Side: Adventures in writing, 1960-1980. New York: New York Public Library.
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, XX(1), 37-46.
7. E-Poets on the state of their electronic art: A Currents' survey. (2001). Currents in Electronic Literacy, 5. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/currents/fall01/survey/index.html.
8. Geyh, P. (2002). The literary magazine, the Web, and the changing of the avant-garde. In Hurliman, L., & Kunakemakorn, N.C., (Eds.), WithoutCovers://literary_magazines@the_digital_edge. West Lafayette, IN: Notabell.
9. Glazier, L.P. (2002). Digital poetics: The making of e-poetries. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
10. Kling, R. (1999, January). What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib. Retrieved September 12, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ january99/kling/01kling.html.
11. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Kress, G. (1993). Genre as social process. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
13. Miller, C. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis. (Original work published in 1984).
14. Minium, E.W., King, B.M., and Bear, G. (1993). Statistical reasoning in psychology and education (3rd ed.). Wiley: New York.
15. Paling, S. (2006, November). Artistic use of information technology: Toward a definition of Literature and Art Informatics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Social Informatics Symposium, Austin, TX.
16. Paling, S., & Nilan, M. (2006). Technology, values, and genre change: The case of little magazines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(7), 862-872.
17. Poets & Writers. (2003). A directory of American poets and fiction writers (2003-2004 ed.). New York: Poets & Writers.
18. Svennson, C. (1991). No horror of the blank sheet - the word processor in literary use. Poetics, 20(1), 27-51.
19. nd ed.). Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/sampnon.php.
20. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-236.