Modelling the fate of organic micropollutants in stormwater ponds

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 409, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 2597-2606

  Vezzaro, Luca ^a   Eriksson, Eva ^a   Ledin, Anna ^a   Mikkelsen, Peter S ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Dynamic modelling; Model calibration; Multimedia modelling; Organic micropollutants; Stormwater; Stormwater treatment

Indexed keywords

BENZENE; DECONTAMINATION; DYNAMIC MODELS; HERBICIDES; LAKES; POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; POLLUTION INDUCED CORROSION; PYRENE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STORM SEWERS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

CHEMICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; MODEL CALIBRATION; ORGANIC MICRO-POLLUTANTS; STORMWATER POLLUTANTS; STORMWATER TREATMENT; STORMWATERS; TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS;

STORMS;

BENZENE; CARBAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; GLYPHOSATE; IODOPROPYNYL BUTYLCARBAMIC ACID; PYRENE; RUNOFF; STORM WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 3 IODO 2 PROPYNYLBUTYLCARBAMATE; 3-IODO-2-PROPYNYLBUTYLCARBAMATE; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GLYCINE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PYRENE DERIVATIVE; RAIN;

ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; MULTIMEDIA; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTION CONTROL; POND; RISK ASSESSMENT; STORMWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; SWEDEN; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL; WATER TREATMENT; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; SANITATION; SEWAGE;

BENZENE; CARBAMATES; DRAINAGE, SANITARY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GLYCINE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PYRENES; RAIN; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 79960953859     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.046     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Avellaneda P, Ballestero T, Roseen R, Houle J. Modeling urban storm-water quality treatment: model development and application to a surface sand filter. J Environ Eng-ASCE 2010;136:68-77.
2. Bedan ES, Clausen JC. Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from traditional and low impact development watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2009;45:998-1008.
3. Bentzen TR, Larsen T. Heavy metal and PAH concentrations in highway runoff deposits fractionated on settling velocities. J Environ Eng 2009;135:1244-7.
4. Beven K, Binley A. Future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 1992;6:279-98.
5. Borden RC, Black DC, McBlief KV. MTBE and aromatic hydrocarbons in North Carolina stormwater runoff. Environ Pollut 2001;118:141-52.
6. Botta F, Lavinson G, Couturier G, Alliot F, Moreau-Guigon E, Fauchon N, et al. Transfer of glyphosate and its degradate AMPA to surface waters through urban sewerage systems. Chemosphere 2009;77:133-9.
7. Brandes LJ, den Hollander HA, van de Meent D. SimpleBox 2.0: a nested multimedia fate model for evaluating the environmental fate of chemicals. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 1996. Report no. 719101029.
8. Brix KV, Keithly J, Santore RC, DeForest DK, Tobiason S. Ecological risk assessment of zinc from stormwater runoff to an aquatic ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 2010;408:1824-32.
9. Brun R, Kühni M, Siegrist H, Gujer W, Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters - systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res 2002;36:4113-27.
10. Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Modell Softw 2007;22:1509-18.
11. Chan K, Tarantola S, Saltelli A, Sobol' IM. Variance-basedmethods. In: Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott EM, editors. Sensitivity analysis. Chirchester, United Kingdom: JohnWiley & Sons; 2004.
12. De Keyser W, Gevaert V, Verdonck F, Nopens I, De Baets B, Vanrolleghem PA, Mikkelsen PS, Benedetti L. Combining multimedia models with integrated urban water system models for micropollutants. Water Sci Technol 2010;62:1614-22.
13. den Hollander HA, van de Meent D. SimpleBox 3.0: a multimedia mass balance model for evaluating the environmental fate of chemicals. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2004. RIVM report 601200003a.
14. DiBlasi CJ, Houng L, Davis AP, Ghosh U. Removal and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants in an urban stormwater bioretention facility. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:494-502.
15. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. 2000/60/EC. European Commission; 2000.
16. Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2008/105/EC. European Commission; 2008.
17. Dotto CBS,KleidorferM,Deletic A, Fletcher TD,McCarthyDT, RauchW. Stormwater quality models: performance and sensitivity analysis.Water Sci Technol 2010;62:837-43.
18. Eriksson E, Baun A, Mikkelsen PS, Ledin A. Risk assessment of xenobiotics in stormwater discharged to Harrestrup Å, Denmark. Desalination 2007;215:187-97.
19. ESIS (European chemical Substances Information System). IPBC - assessment report. Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market - inclusion of active substances in Annex I or IA to Directive 98/8/EC. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection; 2008. Available from http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/.
20. European Commission. Technical guidance document on risk assessment. Part II. Luxemburg: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Chemicals Bureau (ECB), Office for official publications of the European Communities; 2003.
21. Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G. Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods. Environ Modell Softw 2009a;24:1100-11.
22. Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G. Identifiability analysis for receiving water body quality modelling. Environ Modell Softw 2009b;24:54-62.
23. Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G. Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis. Water Res 2011;45:37-50.
24. Gatelli D, Kucherenko S, Ratto M, Tarantola S. Calculating first-order sensitivity measures: a benchmark of some recent methodologies. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2009;94:1212-9.
25. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A. Pollutant removal performance of field-scale stormwater biofiltration systems. Water Sci Technol 2009;59:1567-76.
26. Hollander A, Baijens I, Ragas A, Huijbregts M, van de Meent D. Validation of predicted exponential concentration profiles of chemicals in soils. Environ Pollut 2007;147:757-63.
27. HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank). Pyrene (CAS 129-00-0). [Internet]Bethesda, Maryland, USA: National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health; 2002 [updated 2002; cited 24 Mar 2010]. Available from http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/index.html.
28. HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank). [Internet]Glyphosate (CAS 1071-83-6). Bethesda, Maryland, USA: National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health; 2006 [updated 2006; cited 24 Mar 2010]. Available from http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/index.html.
29. Hwang H-M, Foster GD. Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban stormwater runoff flowing into the tidal Anacostia River, Washington, DC, USA. Environ Pollut 2006;40:416-26.
30. Jansons K, German J, Howes T. Evaluating hydrodynamic behaviour and pollutant removal in various stormwater treatment pond configurations. In: Eriksson E, Gen-Fuhrman H, Vollertsen J, Ledin A, Hvited-Jacobsen T, Mikkelsen PS, editors. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage; 21-26 August 2005; Copenhagen, Denmark; 2005.
31. Kanso A, Chebbo G, Tassin B. Application of MCMC-GSA model calibration method to urban runoff quality modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2006;91:1398-405.
32. Karlavičiene V, Švediene S, Marčiulioniene DE, Randerson P, Rimeika M, HoglandW. The impact of stormwater runoff on a small urban stream. J Soils Sediments 2009;9:6-12.
33. Kayhanian M, Stransky C, Bay S, Lau S-L, Stenstrom MK. Toxicity of urban highway runoff with respect to storm duration. Sci Total Environ 2008;389:386-406.
34. Kleidorfer M, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Rauch W. Impact of input data uncertainties on urban stormwater model parameters. Water Sci Technol 2009;60:1545-54.
35. Kutzner R, Brombach H, GeiferWF. Sewer solids separation by sedimentation -the problem of modeling, validation and transferability.Water Sci Technol 2007;55:113-23.
36. Ledin A, Eriksson E, Hörsing M, Lützhøft H-CH, Andersen HR, Hollender J, Krauss M. Sampling, sample preparation and storage. C. specific analytical methods. In: Düring R-A, Hummel H, Gäth S, editors. Handbook of environmental analysis: emerging compounds and emerging strategies. Wiley VCH; in press.
37. Lindblom E, Ahlman S, Mikkelsen PS. How uncertain is model-based prediction of copper loads in stormwater runoff? Water Sci Technol 2007a;56:65-72.
38. Lindblom E, Madsen H, Mikkelsen PS. Comparative uncertainty analysis of copper loads in stormwater systems using GLUE and grey-box modeling. Water Sci Technol 2007b;56:11-8.
39. Lützhøft H-CH, Eriksson E, Scholes L, Donner E, Wickman T, Lecloux A, et al. Database Presenting Basic Information about EU WFD Priority Substances. Deliverable D3.1; Source Control options for Reducing Emission of Priority Pollutants (ScorePP). Specific Targeted Research Project (STREP) funded by the European Commission under the Sixth Framework Programme; 2008. Available from http://www.scorepp.eu.
40. Mackay D. Multimedia environmental models: the fugacity approach. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC press; 2001.
41. Mannina G, Viviani G. An urban drainage stormwater quality model: model development and uncertainty quantification. J Hydrol 2010;381:248-65.
42. Morris MD. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 1991;33:161-74.
43. Naito W, Masashi K, Tsushima K, Iwasaki Y. Exposure and risk assessment of zinc in Japanese surface waters. Sci Total Environ 2010;408:4271-84.
44. Nordeidet B, Nordeide T, Åstebøl SO, Hvitved-Jacobsen T. Prioritising and planning of urban stormwater treatment in the Alna watercourse in Oslo. Sci Total Environ 2004;334-335:231-8.
45. Parchure TM, Mehta AJ. Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits. J Hydraul Eng 1985;111:1308-26.
46. Pederson BM, Thibodeaux LJ, Valsaraj KT, Reible DD. Testing a multimedia compartmental model with monitoring data. Environ Toxicol Chem 2001;20:2114-21.
47. Persson J, Wittgren HB. How hydrological and hydraulic conditions affect performance of ponds. Ecol Eng 2003;21:259-69.
48. Persson J, Somes NLG, Wong THF. Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci Technol 1999;40:291-300.
49. Pujol G. Simplex-based screening designs for estimating metamodels. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2009;94:1156-60.
50. Reichert P, Vanrolleghem P. Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the River Water Quality Model No. 1 (RWQM1). Water Sci Technol 2001;43:329-38.
51. Revitt M, Scholes L, Ellis JB. A pollutant removal prediction tool for stormwater derived diffuse pollution. Water Sci Technol 2008;57:1257-64.
52. Rodriguez JP, Achleitner S, Moderl M, Rauch W, Maksimovic C, McIntyre N, et al. Sediment and pollutant load modelling using an integrated urban drainage modelling toolbox: an application of City Drain. Water Sci Technol 2010;61: 2273-82.
53. Saltelli A, Annoni P. How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis. Environ Modell Softw 2010;25:1508-17.
54. Saltelli A, Ratto M, Tarantola S, Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model-based inference. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2006;91:1109-25.
55. Schaaf E, Granz C, Pinazo C, Lansard B. Field and laboratory measurements of sediment erodibility: a comparison. J Sea Res 2006;55:30-42.
56. Schoknecht U, Gruycheva J, Mathies H, Bergmann H, Burkhardt M. Leaching of biocides used in façade coatings under laboratory test conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:9321-8.
57. Scholes L, Revitt M, Ellis JB. A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials. J Environ Manage 2008;88:467-78.
58. Shinya M, Tsuchinaga T, Kitano M, Yamada Y, Ishikawa M. Characterization of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban highway runoff. Water Sci Technol 2000;42:201-8.
59. Stockholm Vatten. SORBUS reninsganläggning för dagvatten [SORBUS treatment for stormwater]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Vatten AB; 2006. Report nr. 12-2006. Swedish.
60. Szenasy E. Assessing the potential impact of the antisapstain chemicals, DDAC and IPBC, in the Fraser River. DOE FRAP 1998-07. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ESB consulting for Environment Canada, Environmental Conservation Branch, Aquatica and Atmospheric Science Division; 1998.
61. Togerö Å. Leaching of hazardous substances from concrete constituents and painted wood panels. [PhD Dissertation]. Goteborg, Sweden: Department of Building Materials, Chalmers University of Technology; 2004.
62. USEPA. Estimation Programs Interface (EPI) Suite™ (v 4.0). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Pollution Prevention Toxics and Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC); 2008 [cited 24 Mar 2010]. Avaialble from http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuitedl.htm.
63. Van Der Ham R, Winterwerp JC. Turbulent exchange of fine sediments in a tidal channel in the Ems/Dollard estuary. Part II: analysis with a 1DV numerical model. Cont Shelf Res 2001;21:1629-47.
64. Vanhooren H, Meirlaen J, Amerlinck Y, Claeys F, Vangheluwe H, Vanrolleghem PA. WEST: modelling biological wastewater treatment. J Hydroinform 2003;5:27-50.
65. Vezzaro L, Eriksson E, Ledin A, Mikkelsen PS. Dynamic stormwater treatment unit model for micropollutants (STUMP) based on substance inherent properties. Water Sci Technol 2010;62:622-9.
66. Wong THF, Fletcher TD, DuncanHP, Jenkins GA. Modelling urban stormwater treatment- a unified approach. Ecol Eng 2006;27:58-70.