Developing and using a rubric for evaluating evidence-based medicine point-of-care tools

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 247-254

  Shurtz, Suzanne ^a   Foster, Margaret J ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LIBRARY; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; TEXAS;

EID: 79960950040     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.012     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Vinson DC, Stevermer JJ, Pifer EA. Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):710-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7339.710.
2. Campbell R, Ash J. An evaluation of five bedside information products using a user-centered, task-oriented approach. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):435-41, e206-e207.
3. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schunemann HJ, Edejer TT, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490-4. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
4. Serdar MA, Turan M, Cihan M. Rapid access to information resources in clinical biochemistry: medical applications of personal digital assistants (PDA). Clin Exp Med. 2008 Jun;8(2):117-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-008-0166-y.
5. Kim S, Willett LR, Murphy DJ, O'Rourke K, Sharma R, Shea JA. Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum on resident use of electronic resources: a randomized controlled study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov;23(11): 1804-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0766-y.
6. Jones JS, Emery M. Answering emergency physicians' clinical questions: evidence-based Internet resources. Mich Emerg Med News Views. 2006 May;26(4):10-2.
7. Schwartz K, Northrup J, Israel N, Crowell K, Lauder N, Neale AV. Use of on-line evidence-based resources at the point of care. Fam Med. 2003 Apr;35(4):251-6.
8. Alper BS, Stevermer JJ, White DS, Ewigman BG. Answering family physicians' clinical questions using electronic medical databases. J Fam Pract. 2001 Nov;50(11): 960-5.
9. Fox GN, Moawad N. UpToDate: a comprehensive clinical database. J Fam Pract. 2003 Sep;52(9):706-10.
10. UpToDate. Consult the medical resource doctors trust [Internet]. UpToDate; 2010 [cited 13 Oct 2010].,http://www.uptodate.com/patients/.
11. Alper BS. DynaMed is evidence based. Fam Med. 2003 Sep;35(8):540.
12. DynaMed. Content/editorial policies [Internet]. EBSCO [cited 13 Oct 2010].,http://www.ebscohost.com/dynamed/sources.php.
13. Alper BS, White DS, Ge B. Physicians answer more clinical questions and change clinical decisions more often with synthesized evidence: a randomized trial in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):507-13.
14. McCord G, Smucker WD, Selius BA, Hannan S, Davidson E, Schrop SL, Rao V, Albrecht P. Answering questions at the point of care: do residents practice EBM or manage information sources? Acad Med. 2007 Mar;82(3): 298-303.
15. Schilling LM, Steiner JF, Lundahl K, Anderson RJ. Residents' patient-specific clinical questions: opportunities for evidence-based learning. Acad Med. 2005 Jan;80(1):51-6.
16. Fenton SH, Badgett RG. A comparison of primary care information content in UpToDate and the National Guideline Clearinghouse. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jul;95(3):255-9. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.3.255.
17. Koonce TY, Giuse NB, Todd P. Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Oct;92(4):407-11.
18. Banzi R, Liberati A, Moschetti I, Tagliabue L, Moja L. A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers. J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jul 7;12(3):e26. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1288.
19. Hoogendam A, Stalenhoef AF, Robbe PF, Overbeke AJ. Answers to questions posed during daily patient care are more likely to be answered by UpToDate than PubMed. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Oct 3;10(4):e29. DOI: 10.2196/ jmir.1012.
20. Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Warren J, Arroll B. Evaluation of e-textbooks: DynaMed, MD Consult and UpTo- Date. Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Oct;37(10):878-82.
21. Zoho. Creator [Internet]. Pleasanton, CA: Zoho; 2005 [cited 21 Mar 2011].,http://www.zoho.com/creator/.
22. Trumble J, Anderson M, Caldwell M, Fulton S, Howard A, Varman B. A systematic evaluation of evidence based medicine tools for point-of-care. 2006 Presented at Annual Meeting of the South Central Chapter of the Medical Library Association; College Station, TX; 2006.
23. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE.
24. Cherry DK, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. Advance data from vital and health statistics: national ambulatory medical care survey: 2005 summary [Internet]. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007 Jun 29 [cited 13 Oct 2010].,http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad387.pdf.
25. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, Bowman M. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):59-67.
26. Habour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):334-6.