Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): Patients' perceptions and attitudes

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 56, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2415-2422

  Li, Wen ^a,k   Xu, Hong ^b   Wang, Zi Kai ^a   Fan, Zhi Ning ^c   Ba, Shan Duo ^d   Zou, Duo Wu ^e   Ren, Xu ^f   Hu, Bing ^g   Huang, Yong Hui ^h   Sun, Ming Jun ⁱ   Liu, Jie ^j   Xu, Ping ^l   Zhu, Qi ^m   Liu, Si De ⁿ   Xiao, Jian Guo ^a  

^a CHINESE PLA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

^b THE FIRST HOSPITAL OF JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Peoples Hospital of Xinjiang Municipality   (China)

^e SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f Heilongjiang Province Hospital   (China)

^g SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^h PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

ⁱ CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^j FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^k Tianjin Union Medicine Centre   (China)

^l NANCHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^m SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

ⁿ SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

more..

Author keywords

Conventional surgery; Laparoscopy; Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES); Patients' perception and attitudes; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; CHINA; CICATRIX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960949153     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: 15732568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1797-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S, et al. Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:390-398. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60006-4
2. Bowrey DJ, Blom D, Crookes PF, et al. Risk factors and the prevalence of trocar site herniation after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:663-666. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s004640080146
3. Breda A, Finelli A, Janetschek G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience. Eur Urol. 2009;55:836-850. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.018
4. Gil-Cardenas A, Cordon C, Gamino R, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from an initial series of 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:991-994. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9556-6
5. Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg. 2009;33:208-214. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9843-y
6. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: A novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:114-117. pii: S0016510704013094.
7. Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA et al. Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61:449-453. pii: S0016510704028287.
8. Park PO, Bergstrom M, Ikeda K et al. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: Cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:601-606. pii: S0016510704027749.
9. Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:287-292. pii: S0016510705015658.
10. Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB, et al. Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:522-525. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0263-x
11. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, et al. Dual-lumen natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a new method for performing a safe anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:348-351. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9659-0
12. Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:329-333. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-005-3006-0
13. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars: Report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823-826. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.9.823
14. Hyder Q, Zahid MA, Ahmad W, et al. Diagnostic transgastric flexible peritoneoscopy: is pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery a fantasy? Singap Med J. 2008;49:e375-e381.
15. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, et al. Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:16-20. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9548-6
16. Stark M, Benhidjeb T. Natural orifice surgery: transdouglas surgery-a new concept. JSLS. 2008;12:295-298.
17. Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S, et al. Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery? Rev Med Suisse. 2010;6:1292-1297.
18. Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F et al. Female population perception of conventional laparoscopy transumbilical LESS, and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1007/s00464-010- 1554-4
19. Xiao J, Li W. Investigation for acceptance of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery by inpatients with digestive diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: AB120 (DDW abstract issue:S1374).
20. Rattner DW, Hawes R, Schwaitzberg S et al. The second SAGES/ASGE white paper on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: 5 years of progress. Surg Endosc. (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1605-5
21. Bucher P, Pugin F, Ostermann S, et al. Patient's point of view on surgical innovations: for less traumatic surgery and enhanced recovery. Rev Med Suisse. 2010;6:1292-1297.
22. Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, et al. Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1519-1525. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0431-5
23. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER. Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:854-860. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.053
24. Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Christen D, et al. Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy. 2008;40:581-583. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1055/s-2008-1077363