Patient's point of view on surgical innovations: For less traumatic surgery and enhanced recovery;Innovations chirurgicales et point de vue du patient: Vers une chirurgie moins traumatisante et une réhabilitation accélérée

Revue Medicale Suisse

Volumn 6, Issue 254, 2010, Pages 1292-1297

  Bucher, Pascal ^a   Pugin, François ^a   Ostermann, Sandrine ^a   Morel, Philippe ^a  

^a HUG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY IMAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL CARE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; TRAUMATOLOGY; VALIDITY;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 77954522996     PISSN: 16609379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. * Périssat J. Laparoscopic surgery: A pioneer's point of view. World J Surg 1999;23:863-8.
2. Connor S. Single-port-access cholecystectomy: History should not be allowed to repeat. World J Surg 2009;33:1020-1.
3. ** Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 2010;24:762-8.
4. ** Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Scarless surgery: Reality through umbilical Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS)? Rev Med Suisse 2009;5:1412-5.
5. Polle S, Dunker M, Slors J, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: Long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1301-7. (Pubitemid 47125070)
6. Li W, Xiao J. Investigation for acceptance of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery by inpatients with digestive disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:AB120.
7. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman E. Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:854-60.
8. Hagen M, Wagner O, Christen D, Morel P. Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: Results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy 2008;4:1550-2.
9. Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P. E-NOTES appendectomy versus transvaginal appendectomy: Similar cosmetic results but shorter complete recovery? Surg Endosc 2009;23:916-7.
10. Navarra G, Ascanelli S, Sortini D, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:695.
11. Esposito C. One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 1998;12:177-8.
12. Kelley W. Single port laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopy Today 2008;7:5-6.
13. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, et al. Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 2009;33:1015-8.
14. Curcillo PG, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, et al. Single-port-access (SPA(TM)) cholecystectomy: A multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 2010;epub ahead of print
15. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single-port laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernia. Hernia 2009;13:569-70.
16. Podolsky ER, Mouhlas A, Wu AS, et al. Single Port Access (SPA) laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Initial report of 30 cases. Surg Endosc; epub ahead of print.
17. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:101.
18. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:1013-6.
19. White W, Haber G, Goel R, et al. Single-port urological surgery: Single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 2009;74:801-4.
20. ** ASGE/SAGES Working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery white paper 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:199-203.
21. Bachmann A, Wyler S. Editorial comment on: Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using gelport as the access platform. Eur Urol 2009;57:136-7.
22. ** Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 2009;15:355-8.
23. Gouvaz N, Tan E, Windsor A. Fast-track versus standard care in colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:1119-31.
24. Counihan T, Favuzza J. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009;22:60-72.
25. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller J. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;20:CD003145.
26. Slim K, Fingerhut A. Laparoscopy or fast-track surgery, or both? Surg Endosc 2009;23:465-6.
27. Wind J, Hofland J. Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surgery 2006;16:1-8.
28. * Ostermann S, Bucher P, Gervaz P, Morel P. Really so far from fast-track colorectal surgery in senior patients? Rev Med Suisse 2009;5:1676-9.
29. Audisio R, Pope D, Ramesh H, et al. Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008;65:156-63.
30. Kaouk J, Goel R, Haber G, et al. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: Initial report. BJU Int 2009;103:366-9.
31. * Winter D. The cost of laparoscopic surgery is the price of progress. Br J Surg 2009;96:327-8.
32. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:189-96.