A semantic graph-based approach to biomedical summarisation

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-14

  Plaza, Laura ^a   Díaz, Alberto ^a   Gervás, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biomedical concept annotation; Biomedical text summarisation; Concept clustering; Semantic graphs; Unified Medical Language System

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL CONCEPT ANNOTATION; BIOMEDICAL TEXT; CONCEPT CLUSTERING; SEMANTIC GRAPHS; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; SEMANTICS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SEMANTICS; SUBJECT HEADINGS; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM;

EID: 79960922528     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: 18732860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Afantenos S.D., Karkaletsis V., Stamatopoulos P. Summarization from medical documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2005, 33(2):157-177.
2. Lau A., Coeira E. Impact of web searching and social feedback on consumer decision making: a prospective online experiment. Journal of the American Informatics Association 2008, 11:320-331.
3. Hunter L., Cohen K.B. Biomedical language processing: perspective what's beyond PubMed?. Molecular Cell 2006, 21(5):589-594.
4. Reeve L.H., Han H., Brooks A.D. The use of domain-specific concepts in biomedical text summarization. Information Processing and Management 2007, 43:1765-1776.
5. Fiszman M., Rindflesch T.C., Kilicoglu H. Abstraction summarization for managing the biomedical research literature. Proceedings of the computational lexical semantics workshop at HLT-NAACL 2004 2004, 76-83.
6. Brooks A.D., Sulimanoff I. Evidence-based oncology project. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 2002, 11:3-10.
7. Gay C.W., Kayaalp M., Aronson A.R. Semi-automatic indexing of full text biomedical articles. Proceedings of the American Medical informatics association annual symposium 2005, 271-275. Hanley & Belfus Inc., Willow Grove, PA, USA. C.P. Friedman, J. Ash, P. Tarczy-Hornoch (Eds.).
8. National Library of Medicine. Technical report, identification of important text in full text articles using summarization. p. 21. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://ii.nlm.nih.gov/resources/Summarization_and_FullText.pdf.
9. Erkan G., Radev D. LexRank: graph-based centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2004, 22:457-479.
10. Mihalcea R., Tarau P. TextRank - bringing order into text. Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) 2004, 404-411.
11. Nelson S., Powell T., Humphreys B. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) project. Encyclopedia of library and information science 2002, 369-378. Marcel Dekker, Inc. A. Kent, C.M. Hall (Eds.).
12. The handbook of discourse analysis 2004, vol. 24:470-502. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA.
13. Sparck-Jones K. Automatic summarizing: factors directions. Advances in automatic text summarization 1999, 1-12. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. M.T. Mani, I. Maybury (Eds.).
14. Advances in automatic text summarization 1999, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. I. Mani, M.T. Maybury (Eds.).
15. Mani I. Automatic summarization natural language processing 2001, vol. 3. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
16. Brandow R., Mitze K., Rau L.F. Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection. Information Processing and Management 1995, 5(31):675-685.
17. Luhn H.P. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research Development 1958, 2(2):159-165.
18. Edmundson H.P. New methods in automatic extracting. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 1969, 2(16):264-285.
19. Kupiec J., Pedersen J.O., Chen F. A trainable document summarizer. Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval 1995, 68-73. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA. E. Fox, P. Ingwersen, R. Fidel (Eds.).
20. Brin S., Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 1998, 30(1-7):107-117.
21. Litvak M., Last M. Graph-based keyword extraction for single-document summarization. Proceedings of the workshop on multi-source multilingual information extraction and summarization (Coling 2008) 2008, 17-24. ACL Publications, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. S. Bandyopadhyay, T. Poibeau, H. Saggion, R. Yangarber (Eds.).
22. Kleinberg J. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM 1999, 46(5):604-632.
23. Barzilay R., Elhadad M. Using lexical chains for text summarization. Proceedings of the intelligent scalable text summarization workshop (ISTS'97) 1997, 10-18.
24. Yoo I., Hu X., Song I.-Y. A coherent graph-based semantic clustering and summarization approach for biomedical literature and a new summarization evaluation method. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(9):1-15.
25. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/.
26. Shi Z., Melli G., Wang Y., Liu Y., Gu B., Kashani M., et al. Question answering summarization of multiple biomedical documents. Proceedings of the 20th Canadian conference on artificial intelligence, lecture notes in computer science 4509 2007, 284-295. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Z. Kobti, D. Wu (Eds.).
27. Miller GA, Beckwith R, Fellbaum C, Gross D, Miller K. Introduction to WordNet: an on-line lexical database; 1993. p. 1-86. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://wordnetcode.princeton.edu/5papers.pdf.
28. Rindflesch T.C., Fiszman M. The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2003, 36:462-477.
29. Vanderwende L., Suzuki H., Brockett C., Nenkova A. Beyond SumBasic: task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion. Information Processing and Management 2007, 43(6):1606-1618.
30. Jonnalagadda S., Tari L., Hakenberg J., Baral C., Gonzalez G. Towards effective sentence simplification for automatic processing of biomedical text. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2009, short papers 2009, 177-180. ACL Publications, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. M. Collins, S. Narayanan, D.W. Oardandm, L. Vanderwend (Eds.).
31. Jonnalagadda S., Gonzalez G. Sentence simplification aids protein-protein interaction extraction. Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on languages in biology and medicine 2009, 109-114. D. Rebholz-Schuhmann, N. Collier, J.C. Park, L. Wong (Eds.).
32. Lin J., Wilbur W.J. Syntactic sentence compression in the biomedical domain: facilitating access to related articles. Information Retrieval 2007, 10:393-414.
33. Nadkarni P.M. Information retrieval in medicine: overview and applications. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2000, 46(2):122-166.
34. National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/.
35. National Library of Medicine. UMLS Specialist Lexicon fact sheet. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umlslex.html.
36. National Library of Medicine. UMLS Metathesaurus fact sheet. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umlsmeta.html.
37. National Library of Medicine. UMLS Semantic Network fact sheet. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umlssemn.html.
38. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. SNOMED-CT. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/.
39. National Library of Medicine. MetaMap Portal. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://mmtx.nlm.nih.gov/.
40. Aronson A.R. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. Proceedings of the American medical informatics association annual symposium 2001, 17-21. Hanley & Belfus Inc., Willow Grove, PA, USA. S. Bakken (Ed.).
41. Eck M., Vogel S., Waibel A. Improving statistical machine translation in the medical domain using the Unified Medical Language System. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computational linguistics 2004, 792-798.
42. Overby C.L., Tarczy-Hornoch P., Demner-Fushman D. The potential for automated question answering in the context of genomic medicine: an assessment of existing resources and properties of answers. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl. 9 (S8)):1-8.
43. Aronson A.R., Rindflesch T.C. Query expansion using the UMLS Metathesaurus. Proceedings of the American medical informatics association annual symposium 1997, 485-489. Hanley & Belfus Inc., Willow Grove, PA, USA. D.R. Masys (Ed.).
44. Plaza L., Díaz A. Retrieval of similar electronic health records using UMLS concept graphs. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on applications of natural language to information systems (NLDB 2010), lecture notes in computer science 6177 2010, 296-303. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. C.J. Hopfe, Y. Rezgui, E. Métais, A. Preece, H. Li (Eds.).
45. Plaza L., Díaz A., Gervás P. Automatic summarization of news using WordNet concept graphs. Proceedings of the IADIS international conference informatics 2009, 19-26. IADIS Press, Lisbon, Portugal. H. Weghorn, J. Roth, P. Isaías (Eds.).
46. Plaza L., Lloret E., Aker A. Improving automatic image captioning using text summarization techniques. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on text, speech and dialogue, lecture notes in artificial intelligence 6231 2010, 165-172. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. P. Sojka, A. et (Eds.).
47. BioMed Central Corpus. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/datamining/.
48. Schwartz A., Hearst M. A simple algorithm for identifying abbreviation definitions in biomedical text. Proceedings of the pacific symposium on biocomputing 2003, vol. 8:451-462. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
49. BioText (Abbreviation Definition Recognition Software). [accessed 02.10.10]. http://biotext.berkley.edu/software.html.
50. PubMed StopWords. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/static/help/pmhelp.html%23Stopwords.
51. GATE (Generic Architecture for Text Engineering). [accessed 02.10.10]. http://gate.ac.uk/.
52. Shooshan SE, Mork JG, Aronson AR. National library of medicine. Technical report. Ambiguity in the UMLS Metathesaurus; 2009 Edition, p. 46. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://skr.nlm.nih.gov/papers/references/ambiguity09.pdf.
53. Humphrey S., Rogers W., Kilicoglu H., Demner-Fushman D., Rindesch T. Word sense disambiguation by selecting the best semantic type based on journal descriptor indexing: preliminary experiment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:96-113.
54. Barabasi A., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286:509-512.
55. Levenshtein V. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 1966, 163(4):845-848.
56. Bossard A., Généreux M., Poibeau T. Description of the LIPN systems at TAC 2008: summarizing information and opinions. Proceedings of the first text analysis conference (TAC 2008) 2008.
57. Bawakid A., Oussalah M. A semantic summarization system: university of Birmingham at TAC 2008. Proceedings of the first text analysis conference (TAC 2008) 2008.
58. National Institute of Standard and Technology. Document Understanding Conferences (DUC). [accessed 02.10.10]. http://duc.nist.gov/.
59. Litkowski K.C. Summarization experiments in DUC 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 document understanding conference (DUC 2004) 2004.
60. Radev D., Lam W., Elebi A.C., Teufel S., Blitzer J., Liu D., et al. Evaluation challenges in large-scale document summarization. Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting on association for computational linguistics 2003, 375-382. ACL Publications, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. E.W. Hinrichs, D. Roth (Eds.).
61. Mani I. Summarization evaluation: an overview. Proceedings of the 2nd NTCIR workshop on research in Chinese & Japanese text retrieval and text summarization 2001, National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan. J. Adachi, N. Kando (Eds.).
62. Sparck-Jones K., Galliers J. Evaluating natural language processing systems: an analysis and review 1995, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
63. Tratz S., Hovy E. Summarization evaluation using transformed Basic Elements. Proceedings of the text analysis conference (TAC) 2008.
64. Giannakopoulos G., Karkaletsis V., Vouros G., Stamatopoulos P. Summarization system evaluation revisited: N-gram graphs. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 2008, 5(3):1-39.
65. Pitler E., Nenkova A. Revisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing 2008, 186-195. ACL Publications, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. M. Lapata, H.T. Ng (Eds.).
66. Vadlapudi R., Katragadda R. Quantitative evaluation of grammaticality of summaries. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (CICLing 2010), lecture notes in computer science 6008 2010, 736-747. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. A. Gelbukh (Ed.).
67. Lin C.-Y. ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. Proceedings of workshop on text summarization branches out, post-conference workshop of ACL 2004, 74-81. ACL Publications, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. M.-F. Moens (Ed.).
68. Lin C.-Y. Looking for a few good metrics: automatic summarization evaluation - how many samples are enough?. Proceedings of the 4th NTCIR workshop on research in information access technologies information retrieval, question answering and summarization 2004, National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan. J. Adachi, N. Kando (Eds.).
69. Saggion H. SUMMA: a robust and adaptable summarization tool. Revue Traitement Automatique des Langues 2008, 49(2):103-125.
70. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Office online: automatically summarize a document. [accessed 02.10.10]. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word/HA102552061033.aspx.
71. Hovy E.H. Automated text summarization. The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics 2005, 583-598. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. R. Mitkov (Ed.).
72. Smith C.A. Information retrieval in medicine: the electronic medical record as a new domain. Proceedings of the American society for information science and technology, vol. 43, no. 1 2006, 1-30.