The potential for automated question answering in the context of genomic medicine: An assessment of existing resources and properties of answers

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 9, 2009, Pages

  Overby, Casey L ^a,d   Tarczy Hornoch, Peter ^a,b,c   Demner Fushman, Dina ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Washington   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUESTION ANSWERING;

ALGORITHM; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT CARE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 70349853093     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S9-S8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. Realizing the promise of genomics in biomedical research. JAMA 2005, 294(11):1399-402. 10.1001/jama.294.11.1399, 16174701.
2. Zerhouni E. Translational Research: Moving Discovery to Practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007, 81(1):126-8. 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100029, 17186011.
3. Hood L, Rowen L, Galas DJ, Aitchison JD. Systems biology at the Institute for Systems Biology. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2008,
4. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building the Unified Medical Language System. Proc Annu Symp Computer Applications in Medical Care 1989, 13:475-80.
5. Aronson AR. Effective Mapping of Biomedical Text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap Program. Proc AMIA Symp 2001, 17-21. 2243666, 11825149.
6. Repository for Informed Decision Making (RIDeM). (Accessed Sept 24th, 2008)., http://archive.nlm.nih.gov/ridem/
7. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 1995, 123(3):A12-A13.
8. TREC Genomics Track website. (Accessed September 24th, 2008.)., http://ir.ohsu.edu/genomics/
9. Hersh W. TREC 2006 Genomics Track overview. The Fifteenth Text Retrieval Conference - TREC 2006. NIST
10. Hersh W, Cohen AM, Ruslen L, Roberts P. TREC 2007 genomics track overview. The Sixteenth Text Retrieval Conference - TREC 2007. NIST
11. Demner-Fushman D, Humphrey SM, Ide NC, Loane RF, Mork JG, Ruch P, Ruiz ME, Smith LH, Wilbur WJ, Aronson AR. Combining resources to find answers to biomedical questions. The Sixteenth Text Retrieval Conference - TREC 2007. NIST
12. Pratt W, Yetisgen-Yildiz M. A Study of Biomedical Concept Identification: MetaMap vs. People. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003, 529-533. 1479976, 14728229.
13. Dingare S, Nissim M, Finkel J, Manning C, Grover CA. A system for identifying named entities in biomedical text: how results from two evaluations reflect on both the system and the evaluations. Comp Funct Genomics 2005, 6(1-2):77-85. 2448599, 18629295, 10.1002/cfg.457.
14. Aronson AR, Mork JG, Neveol A, Shooshan SE, Demner-Fushman D. Methodology for Creating UMLS Content Views Appropriate for Biomedical Natural Language Processing. Proc AMIA Symp 2008, 2655934, 18998883.
15. Stenson PD, Ball EV, Mort M, Phillips AD, Shiel JA, Thomas NST, Abeysinghe S, Krawczak M, Cooper DN. Human gene mutation database (HGMD): 2003 update. Hum Mutat 2003, 21:577-581. 10.1002/humu.10212, 12754702.
16. Uzuner O, Szolovits P, Kohane I. i2b2 workshop on natural language processing challenges for clinical records. Proc AMIA Symp 2006,
17. Hirschman L, Krallinger M, Valencia A, . editors Second BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop. 2007, Fundación CNIO Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
18. Rindflesch TC, Fiszman M. The Interaction of Domain Knowledge and Linguistic Structure in Natural Language Processing: Interpreting Hypernymic Propositions in Biomedical Text. J Biomed Inform 2003, 36(6):462-477. 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.003, 14759819.