Do the skilled and prime-aged unemployed benefit more from training? Effect heterogeneity of public training programmes in Germany

Applied Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 25, 2011, Pages 3465-3494

  Rinne, Ulf ^a   Schneider, Marc ^a   Uhlendorff, Arne ^b  

^a IZA   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPLOYMENT; LABOR MARKET; SKILLED LABOR; TRAINING; UNEMPLOYMENT;

GERMANY;

EID: 79960914635     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036841003670697     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W. (2008) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators, Econometrica, 76, 1537-57.
2. Acemoglu, D. and Pischke, J.-S. (1998) Why do firms train? Theory and evidence, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 79-119.
3. Baumgartner, H. J. and Caliendo, M. (2008) Turning unemployment into self-employment: effectiveness of two start-up programmes, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 347-73.
4. Biewen, M., Fitzenberger, B., Osikominu, A. and Waller, M. (2007) Which programme for whom? Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of public sponsored training programmes in Germany, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2885, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn.
5. Büsch, V., Dahl, S.-A. and Dittrich, D. A. V. (2009) An empirical study of age discrimination in Norway and Germany, Applied Economics, 41, 633-51.
6. Caliendo, M., Hujer, R. and Thomsen, S. L. (2008a) Identifying effect heterogeneity to improve the efficiency of job creation schemes in Germany, Applied Economics, 40, 1101-22.
7. Caliendo, M., Hujer, R. and Thomsen, S. L. (2008b) The employment effects of job creation schemes in Germany: a microeconometric evaluation, in Estimating and Evaluating Treatment Effects in Econometrics, Volume 21 of Advances in Econometrics (Eds) D. L. Millimet, J. A. Smith and E. J. Vytlacil, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK, pp. 383-430.
8. Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31-72.
9. Caliendo, M. and Steiner, V. (2005) Aktive Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung der mikroökonomischen Evaluationsergebnisse, Journal for Labour Market Research, 38, 396-418.
10. Dustmann, C. and Meghir, C. (2005) Wages, experience and seniority, The Review of Economic Studies, 72, 77-108.
11. Eichhorst, W. and Zimmermann, K. F. (2007) And then there were four. how many (and which) measures of active labor market policy do we still need?, Applied Economics Quarterly, 53, 243-72.
12. Fitzenberger, B., Osikominu, A. and Völter, R. (2010) Get training or wait? Long-run employment effects of training programmes for the unemployed in West Germany, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, forthcoming.
13. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. A. and Todd, P. (1998) Characterizing selection bias using experimental data, Econometrica, 66, 1017-98.
14. Hujer, R., Thomsen, S. L. and Zeiss, C. (2006) The effects of vocational training programmes on the duration of unemployment in Eastern Germany, Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90, 299-322.
15. Hujer, R. and Wellner, M. (2000) Berufliche Weiterbildung und individuelle Arbeitslosigkeitsdauer in West-und Ostdeutschland: eine mikroökonometrische Analyse, Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung, 33, 405-19.
16. Jacobebbinghaus, P. and Seth, S. (2007) The German integrated employment biographies sample IEBS, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 335-42.
17. Jaenichen, U. and Stephan, G. (2009) The effectiveness of targeted wage subsidies for hard-to-place workers, Applied Economics. DOI: 10.1080/00036840802600426.
18. Kluve, J. (2010). The effectiveness of European active labor market policy, Labour Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.02.004.
19. LaLonde, R. J. (2003) Employment and training programmes, in Means Tested Transfer Programmes in the US (Eds) M. Feldstien and R. Moffitt, University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago, USA, pp. 517-86.
20. Lechner, M. (1999) Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in East-Germany after unification, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17, 74-90.
21. Lechner, M. (2000) An evaluation of publicsector-sponsored continuous vocational training programmes in East Germany, Journal of Human Resources, 35, 347-75.
22. Lechner, M. (2002) Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Statistics in Society, 165, 59-82.
23. Lechner, M. and Melly, B. (2007) Earnings effects of training programmes, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2926, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.
24. Lechner, M., Miquel, R. and Wunsch, C. (2007) The curse and blessing of training the unemployed in a changing economy: the case of East Germany after unification, German Economic Review, 8, 468-509.
25. Lechner, M., Miquel, R. and Wunsch, C. (2010) Long-run effects of public sector sponsored training in West Germany, Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming.
26. Lechner, M. and Wunsch, C. (2008) What did all the money do? On the general ineffectiveness of recent west German labour market programmes, Kyklos, 61, 134-74.
27. Leuven, E. and Sianesi, B. (2003) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html (accessed 26 February 2010).
28. Mueser, P. R., Troske, K. R. and Gorislavsky, A. (2007) Using state administrative data to measure programme performance, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 761-83.
29. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
30. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score, The American Statistican, 39, 33-8.
31. Schneider, H., Brenke, K., Jesske, B., Kaiser, L., Rinne, U., Schneider, M., Steinwede, J. and Uhlendorff, A. (2007) Evaluation der Maßnahmen zur Umsetzung der Vorschläge der Hartz-Kommission-Bericht 2006, IZA Research Report No. 10, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.
32. Sianesi, B. (2004) An evaluation of the active labor market programmes in Sweden, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 133-55.
33. Smith, J. A. and Todd, P. E. (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of non-experimental estimators?, Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305-53.
34. Stephan, G. (2008) The effects of active labor market programmes in Germany: an investigation using different definitions of non-treatment, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 228, 586-611.
35. van Ours, J. C. (2004) The locking-in effect of subsidized jobs, Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 37-55.
36. Winkelmann, R. (1996) Employment prospects and skill acquisition of apprenticeship-trained workers in Germany, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49, 658-72.
37. Zhao, Z. (2008) Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications, Economics Letters, 98, 309-19.