Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 59-82

  Lechner, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Balancing score; Matching; Multiple programmes; Programme evaluation; Sensitivity analysis; Treatment effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036420919     PISSN: 09641998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-985X.0asp2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Angrist, J.D. (1998) Estimating labor market impact of voluntary military service using social security data. Econometrica, 66, 249 288.
2. Angrist, J.D. and Krueger, A.B. (1999) Empirical strategies in labor economics. In Handbook of Labor Economics (eds O. Ashenfelter and D. Card), vol. IIIA, ch. 23, pp. 1277-1366. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
3. Börsch-Supan, A. and Hajivassiliou, V.A. (1993) Smooth unbiased multivariate probabilities simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. J. Econometr., 58, 347-368.
4. Brodaty T., Crepon, B. and Fougère, D. (2001) Using matching estimators to evaluate alternative youth employment programmes: evidence from France, 1986-1988. In Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies (eds M. Lechner and F. Pfeiffer), pp. 85-123. Heidelberg: Physica.
5. Dehejia, R.H. and Wahba, S. (1999) Causal effects in non-experimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programmes. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 94, 1053-1062.
6. Dorsett, R. (2001) The New Deal for Young People: relative effectiveness of the options. Mimeo. Policy Studies Institute, London.
7. Fay, R.G. (1996) Enhancing the effectiveness of active labour market policies: evidence from programme evaluations in OECD countries. Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Paper 18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
8. Frölich, M., Heshmati, A. and Lechner, M. (2000) A microeconometric evaluation of rehabilitation of long-term sickness in Sweden. Discussion Paper 2000-04. University of St Gallen, St Gallen.
9. Gerfin M. and Lechner, M. (2000) Microeconometric evaluation of the active labour market policy in Switzerland. Discussion Paper 2000-10. University of St Gallen, St Gallen.
10. Geweke, J., Keane, M. and Runkle, D. (1994) Alternative computational approaches to inference in the multinomial probit model. Rev. Econ. Statist., 76, 609-632.
11. Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J.A. and Todd, P. (1998) Characterisation selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66, 1017-1098.
12. Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P.E. (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training program. Rev. Econ. Stud., 64, 605-654.
13. _(1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev. Econ. Stud., 65, 261-294.
14. Heckman, J.J., LaLonde, R.J. and Smith, J.A. (1999) The economics and econometrics of active labour market programs. In Handbook of Labor Economics (eds O. Ashenfelter and D. Card), vol. IIIA, ch. 31, pp. 1865-2097. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Heckman, J.J. and Robb, R. (1986) Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments on outcomes. In Drawing Inferences from Self-selected Samples (ed. H. Wainer), pp. 63-107. New York: Springer.
16. Holland, P.W. (1986) Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). J. Am. Statist. Ass., 81, 945-970.
17. Imbens, G.W. (2000) The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87, 706-710.
18. Lalive, R., van Ours, J.C. and Zweimüller, J. (2000) The impact of active labor market policies and benefit entitlement rules on the duration of unemployment. Mimeo.
19. Larsson, L. (2000) Evaluation of Swedish youth labour market programmes. Discussion Paper 2000:1. Office for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala.
20. Lechner, M. (1999) Earnings and employment effects of continuous off-the-job training in East Germany after unification. J. Bus. Econ. Statist., 17, 74-90.
21. _(2000) An evaluation of public sector sponsored continuous vocational training programs in East Germany. J. Hum. Resour., 35, 347-375.
22. _(2001a) Programme heterogeneity and propensity score matching: an application to the evaluation of active labour market policies. Rev. Econ. Statist., to be published.
23. _(2000b) Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption. In Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies (eds M. Lechner and F. Pfeiffer), pp. 43-58. Heidelberg: Physica.
24. _(2001c) A note on the common support problem in applied evaluation studies. Discussion Paper 2001-01. Department of Economics, University of St Gallen, St Gallen.
25. Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-50.
26. Roy, A.D. (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxf. Econ. Pap., 3, 135-146.
27. Rubin, D.B. (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol., 66, 688-701.
28. Smith, J. and Todd, P.E. (2000) Does matching overcome Lalonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators. J. Econometr., to be published.
29. Spanos, A. (1999) Probability Theory and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.