Participant information clips: A role for digital video technologies to recruit, inform and debrief research participants and disseminate research findings

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 259-270

  Hammond, Simon P ^a   Cooper, Neil J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ICT; Informed consent; Participant information clips; Young people

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960904736     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2010.530029     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agar, J. (2005). Constant touch: A global history of the mobile phone. New York: Totem Books.
2. Ashcroft, R. (2003). The ethics and governance of medical research: What does regulation have to do with morality? New Review of Bioethics, 1, 41-58.
3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
4. BPS (British Psychological Society). (2009). Code of ethics and conduct. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
5. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667-1676.
6. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.
7. Jackson, S. (2002). Promoting stability and continuity in care away from home. In D. McNeish, T. Newman, & H. Roberts (Eds.), What works for children (pp. 37-58). Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
9. McCrystal, P. (2008). Researching children and young people in residential state care: Hurdles on the path to consent. Research Ethics Review, 4(3), 89-94.
10. Miller, T., & Boulton, M. (2007). Changing constructions of informed consent: Qualitative research and complex social worlds. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2199-2211.
11. Ness, D.E., Kiesling, S.F., & Lidz, C.W. (2009). Why does informed consent fail? A discourse analytic approach. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37, 349-362.
12. Petrie, P., & Simon, A. (2006). Residential care: Lessons from Europe. In E. Chase, A. Simon, & S. Jackson (Eds.), In care and after: A positive perspective (pp. 115-136). London: Routledge.
13. Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240-252.
14. Rymeski, B., Marchildon, M., Katz, D.A., Vinocur, C.D., Dunn, S.P., Reichard, K.W., Murphy, S.G. (2010). Pilot study using an Internet-based program in informed consent. Journal of Paediatric Surgery, 45, 1137-1141.
15. Salimkhan, G., Manago, A., & Greenfield, P. (2010). The construction of the virtual self on MySpace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), article 1.
16. Schenker, Y. (2010). Computer information program improves patient understanding in informed consent for cardiac catheterization. Outcomes Research in Review, 17(1), 10-13.
17. Stringer, E. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Sugarman, J., McCrory, D.C., & Hubal, R.C. (1998). Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: A structured literature review of empirical research. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(4), 517-524.
19. Vandenbroeck, M., & De Bie, M.B. (2006). Children's agency and educational norms. Childhood, 12(1), 207-218.