Why does informed consent fail? A discourse analytic approach

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 349-362

  Ness, David E ^a   Kiesling, Scott F ^b   Lidz, Charles W ^c  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONVERSATION; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; COMPREHENSION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; LEGAL ASPECT; LINGUISTICS; MENTAL DISEASE; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEORECORDING;

ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL DISORDERS; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 70350507097     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL: A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford Press, 1986
2. Hunt LM, deVoogd KB, Castaneda H: The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Educ Couns 5:302-312, 2005
3. Delany C: Cervical manipulation: how might informed consent be obtained before treatment? J Law Med 10:174-186, 2002
4. Hoffman M, Hammar M, Kjellgren KI, et al: Risk communication in consultations about hormone therapy in the menopause: concordance in risk assessment and framing due to the context. Climacteric 9:347-354, 2006
5. Cameron D: Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage Publications, 2001
6. Katz J: The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. New York: Free Press, 1984
7. Gumperz JJ: Discourse Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982, p 1
8. Sacks H, Schegloff E, Jefferson G: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50:696-735, 1974
9. Frankel RM: Microanalysis and the medical encounter: an exploratory study, in The Interactional Order: New Directions in the Study of Social Order. Edited by Helm DT, Anderson WT, Meehan AJ, et al. New York: Irvington Press, 1984, pp 21-49
10. Goffman E: Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row, 1974
11. Tannen D: What's in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations, in Framing in Discourse. Edited by Tannen D. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993
12. Tannen D, Wallat C: Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview. Soc Psychol Q 50:205-216, 1987
13. Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S: Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expect 4:58-70, 2001 (Pubitemid 32230118)
14. Frankel RM: From sentence to sequence: understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Processes 7:135-170, 1984
15. Heritage J, Maynard DW (editors): Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006
16. Skelton JR, Hobbs FDR: Concordancing: use of language-based research in medical communication. Lancet 353:108-111, 1999 (Pubitemid 29088080)
17. Stevenson FA, Cox K, Britten N, et al: A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance. Health Expect 7:235-245, 2004 (Pubitemid 39166372)
18. Cassell EJ: Consent or obedience? Power and authority in medicine. N Engl J Med 352:328-330, 2005
19. Ingelfinger FJ: Arrogance. N Engl J Med 303:1507-1511, 1980
20. Beckman HB, Frankel RM: The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med 101:692-696, 1984 (Pubitemid 15223315)
21. Mishler EG, Clark JA, Ingelfinger J, et al: The language of attentive patient care: a comparison of two medical interviews. J Gen Intern Med 4:325-335, 1989 (Pubitemid 19183067)
22. Shuy RW: Three types of interference to an effective exchange of information in the medical interview, in The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Edited by Fisher S, Todd AD. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1983, pp 189-202
23. Todd AD. A diagnosis of doctor-patient discourse in the prescription of contraception, in The Social Organization of DoctorPatient Communication. Edited by Fisher S, Todd AD. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1983, pp 159-187
24. Evans DA, Block MR, Steinberg E, et al: Frames and heuristics in doctor-patient discourse. Soc Sci Med 22:1027-1034, 1986
25. Robillard AB, White GM, Maretzki TW: Between doctor and patient: informed consent in conversational interaction, in The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Edited by Fisher S, Todd AD. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1983, pp 107-133
26. Benarde MA, Mayerson EW: Patient-physician negotiation. JAMA 239:1413-1415, 1978
27. Sanders RE, Fitch KL: The actual practice of compliance seeking. Commun Theory 11:263-289, 2001
28. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C: The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 5:319-329, 1982
29. Lidz CW: The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent. Behav Sci Law 24:535-546, 2006
30. Weinfurt KP, Sulmasy DP, Schulman KA, et al: Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theoret Med 24:329-344, 2003
31. Benson PR, Roth LH, Winslade WJ: Informed consent in psychiatric research: preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation. Soc Sci Med 20:1331-1341, 1985
32. Schiffrin D: Discourse Markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987
33. Berg JW, Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, et al: Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice (ed 2). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001
34. Bennett NS, Lidz CW, Monahan J, et al: Inclusion, motivation, and good faith: the morality of coercion in mental hospital admission. Behav Sci Law 11:295-306, 1993
35. Britten N, Stevenson F, Gafaranga J, et al: The expression of aversion to medicines in general practice consultations. Soc Sci Med 59:1495-1503, 2004 (Pubitemid 38891415)
36. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D: Understanding patients' decisions: cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA 270:72-76, 1993
37. Branch WT, Malik TK: Using "windows of opportunities" in brief interviews to understand patients' concerns. JAMA 269:1667-8, 1993
38. Eide H, Frankel R, Haaversen ACB, et al: Listening for feelings: identifying and coding empathic and potential empathic opportunities in medical dialogues. Patient Educ Couns 54:291-297, 2004 (Pubitemid 39485944)
39. Britten N: Making sense of qualitative research: a new series (editorial). Med Educ 39:5-6, 2005
40. Gill VT, Maynard DW: Explaining illness: patients' proposals and physicians' responses, in Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Edited by Heritage J, Maynard DW. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp 115-150
41. Fisher S: Doctor-patient talk: how treatment decisions are negotiated, in The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Edited by Fisher S, Todd AD. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1983, pp 135-157
42. Stivers T: Treatment decisions: negotiations between doctors and patients in acute care encounters, in Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Edited by Heritage J, Maynard DW. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp 279-312
43. Maynard DW, Heritage J: Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication. Med Educ 39:428-435, 2005 (Pubitemid 40503406)
44. Kernberg OF, Selzer MA, Koenigsberg HW, et al: Psychodynamic Psychotherapy of Borderline Patients. New York: Basic Books, 1989, pp 23-24
45. Ness DE, Kiesling SF: Language and connectedness in the medical and psychiatric interview. Pat Educ Couns 68:139-144, 2007