What works (or doesn't) in a DUI court? An example of expedited case processing

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 320-328

  Bouffard, Jeffrey A ^a   Bouffard, Leana A ^a  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960848661     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Belenko S. Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. National Drug Court Institute Review 2001, 4:1-60.
2. Bouffard J.A., Richardson K.A. The effectiveness of drug court programming for specific kinds of offenders: Methamphetamine- and DWI-offenders versus other drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review 2007, 18:274-293.
3. Bouffard J.A., Richardson K.A., Franklin T.W. Drug courts for DWI offenders? The effectiveness of two hybrid drug courts on DWI offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice 2010, 38:25-33.
4. Breckenridge J., Winfree L., Maupin J., Clason L. Drunk drivers, DWI "drug court" treatment, and recidivism: Who fails?. Justice Research and Policy 2000, 2:87-105.
5. Cochran J.K., Chamlin M.B., Seth M. Deterrence or brutalization? An impact assessment of Oklahoma's return to capital punishment. Criminology 1994, 32:107-134.
6. Cooper C.S. Expedited drug case management 1994, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Washington, D.C.
7. Davis R.C., Smith B.E., Rabbitt C.R. Increasing convictions in domestic violence cases: A field test in Milwaukee. Justice System Journal 2001, 22:61-72.
8. DeYoung D.J. An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction 1997, 92:989-997.
9. Federal Bureau of Investigation Crime in the United States 2009 2009, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
10. Freeman-Wilson K., Huddleston C.W. DWI/drug courts: Defining a national strategy 1999, National Drug Court Institute/National Association of Drug Court Professionals, Alexandria, VA.
11. Hill N., Kleist D.M. Evaluation of the Idaho Supreme Court OVW Grant to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders 2008, (Grant No. 2005-WE-AX-0135), Office of Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
12. Hingson R.W., Winter M.R. Epidemiology and consequences of drinking and driving. Alcohol Research & Health 2003, 27:63-78.
13. Homel R. Penalties and the drunk-driver: A study of one thousand offenders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 1981, 14:225-241.
14. Legge J.S., Park J. Policies to reduce alcohol-impaired driving: Evaluating elements of deterrence. Social Science Quarterly 1994, 75:594-606.
15. Lowery F. Eating the plastic- Minnesota's two-track system for drinking driver control: A report on quick driver license revocation based on alcohol test results, independent of criminal charge or court outcome 1983, Minnesota Department of Public Safety, St. Paul, MN.
16. MacDonald J.M., Morral A., Raymond B., Eibner C. The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI court: A 2-year field experiment. Evaluation Review 2007, 31:4-23.
17. Mann R.E., Vingilis E.R., Gavin D., Adlaf E.M., Anglin L. Sentence severity and the drinking driver: Relationships with traffic safety outcome. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1991, 23:483-491.
18. McArthur D.L., Kraus J.F. The specific deterrence of administrative per se laws in reducing drunk driving recidivism. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 1999, 16:68-75.
19. McCleary R., Hay R.A. Applied time series analyses for the social sciences 1980, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. McDowall D., McCleary R., Meidinger E.E., Hay R.A. Interrupted time series analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences 1980, Vol. 21. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
21. McKnight A.J., Voas R. The effect of license suspensions upon DWI recidivism. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving 1991, 7:43-54.
22. Meier R.F. Deterrence doctrine and public policy - A response to utilitarians. Preventing crime 1978, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. J.M. Cramer (Ed.).
23. Morse B.J., Elliott D.S. Effects of ignition interlock devices on DUI recidivism: Findings from a longitudinal study in Hamilton County, Ohio. Crime & Delinquency 1992, 38:131-157.
24. Nagin D.S., Pogarsky G. Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extra legal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology 2001, 39:865-891.
25. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2004 2005, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
26. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2009 2009, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
27. Padgett K.G., Bales W.D., Blomberg T.G. Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology and Public Policy 2006, 5(1):61-91.
28. Peck R.C. Deterrent effects of DUI sanctions. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving 1991, 7:13-41.
29. Pratt T.C., Cullen F.T. Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and justice: A review of research 2005, Vol. 32. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
30. Pratt T.C., Cullen F.T., Blevins K.R., Daigle L.E., Madensen T.D. The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. Taking stock: The empirical status of criminological theory-Advances in criminological theory 2008, Vol. 15. Transactions Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
31. Pratt T.C., Holsinger A.M., Latessa E.J. Treating the chronic DUI offender: 'Turning Point' ten years later. Journal of Criminal Justice 2000, 28:271-282.
32. Quinlan K.P., Brewer R.D., Siegel P., Sleet D.A., Mokdad A.H., Shults R.A., et al. Alcohol-impaired driving among U.S. adults, 1993-2002. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 28:346-350.
33. Ross H.L. Administrative license revocation in New Mexico: An evaluation. Law and Policy 1987, 9:5-16.
34. Ross H.L. Confronting drunk driving: Social policy for saving lives 1992, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
35. Ross H.L., McCleary R., LaFree G.L. Can mandatory jail laws deter drunk driving? The Arizona case. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1990, 81:156-170.
36. Rossi P.H., Freeman H.E., Lipsey M.W. Evaluation: A systematic approach 1999, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 6th Edition.
37. State of Washington Administrative Office of the Courts DUI Sentencing Grid Retrieved April 27, 2010 from. http://www.courts.wa.gov/newsinfo/content/duigrid/DUIGrid.pdf.
38. Taxman F.S., Ellis L. Expediting court dispositions: Quick results, uncertain outcomes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1999, 36:30-55.
39. Taxman F.S., Piquero A.R. On preventing drunk driving recidivism: An examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches. Journal of Criminal Justice 1998, 26:129-143.
40. Wagenaar A.C., Maldonado-Molina M.M. Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: Long-term follow-up in forty-six states. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 2007, 31:1399-1406.
41. Weinrath M., Gartrell J. Specific deterrence and sentence length: The case of drunk drivers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 2001, 17:105-122.
42. Wilson D.B., Mitchell O., MacKenzie D.L. A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology 2006, 2:459-487.
43. Yeh S.S. Cost-benefit analysis of reducing crime through electronic monitoring of parolees and probationers. Journal of Criminal Justice 2010, 38(5):1090-1096.
44. Yu J. Punishment celerity and severity: Testing a specific deterrence model of drunk driving recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice 1994, 22:355-366.
45. Yu J. Punishment and alcohol problems Recidivism among drinking-driving offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice 2000, 28:261-270.
46. Yu J., Williford W.R. Problem drinking and high-risk driving: An analysis of official and self-reported drinking-driving in New York State. Addiction 1993, 88:219-228.
47. Zhang S.X. The Efficiency of working under one roof: An evaluation of Los Angeles County juvenile justice centers. Crime and Delinquency 1996, 42:257-268.