The specific deterrence of administrative per se laws in reducing drunk driving recidivism

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 1 SUPPL., 1999, Pages 68-75

  McArthur, David L ^a   Kraus, Jess F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DRIVER LICENCE; DRUNKEN DRIVING; HUMAN; LAW; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RECIDIVISM; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

EID: 0032927010     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00119-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Becker K. The consequences of drunken driving in South Africa. Med Law. 13:1994;11-17.
2. Hedlund J. The effectiveness of administrative license revocation. Presented to the Second World Conference on Injury Control, Atlanta Georgia; May 1993.
3. Homel R. Drink-driving law enforcement and the legal blood alcohol limit in New South Wales. Accident Anal Prev. 26:1994;147-155.
4. Ross H.L., Klette H., McCleary R. Liberalization and rationalization of drunk-driving laws in Scandinavia. Accident Anal Prev. 16:1984;471-487.
5. Williams A., Weinberg K., Fields M. The effectiveness of administrative license suspension laws. Alcohol Drugs Driving. 7:1991;55-62.
6. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. State laws 1997: DUI/DWI laws. Internet http://www.hwysafety.org/facts/pdf/duidwi97.pdf, 1998.
7. Klein TM. Changes in Alcohol-involved Fatal Crashes Associated with Tougher State Alcohol Legislation. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Safety Administration. DOT HS 807 511; 1989.
8. Ross H.L. Administrative license revocation in New Mexico an evaluation. Law Policy. 9:1987;5-16.
9. Rogers PN. The General Deterrent Impact of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit and Administrative Per se License Suspension Laws. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration and Administrative Per se License Suspension Laws, Volume 1. Sacramento, California: California Department of Motor Vehicles, Research and Development Section. CAL-DMV-RSS-95-158; 1995.
10. Zador P, Lund AK, Fields M, Weinberg K. Fatal Crash Involvement and Laws Against Alcohol-impaired Driving. Washington, DC: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; 1988.
11. Rivara F.P., Thompson D., Beahler C., MacKenzie E. Systematic reviews of strategies to prevent motor vehicle injuries. Am J Prev Med. 16:(1S):1999;1-5.
12. MELVYL, the University of California's electronic library catalog, including holdings from the California State Library, the California Academy of Sciences, the California Historical Society, the Center for Research Studies, and Graduate Theological Union.
13. Stewart K, Gruenewald P, Roth T. An evaluation of the specific deterrence effects of administrative license revocation. Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Alcohol and Drug Dependence, Oslo; July-August 1988.
14. Stewart K, Gruenewald P. The specific deterrence effects of administrative license revocation. Alcohol, drugs and traffic safety, T89. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, Chicago; October 1989.
15. Stewart K., Gruenewald P., Parker R.N. Assessing legal change recidivism and administrative per se laws. J Quant Criminol. 8:1992;375-394.
16. Lacey JJ, Stewart LM, Marchetti LM, Jones RK. An Assessment of the Effects of Implementing and Publicizing Administrative License Revocation for DWI in Nevada. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 807 600; 1990.
17. Rogers PN. The Specific Deterrent Impact of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration Limit and Administrative Per se License Suspension Laws. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of California's 0.08% Blood Alcohol Concentration and Administrative Per se License Suspension Laws, Volume 2. Sacramento, California: California Department of Motor Vehicles, Research and Development Section. CAL-DMV-RSS-97-167; 1997.
18. Ross H.L., Gonzales P. The effect of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders. Accident Anal Prev. 20:1988;379-391.
19. Peck R. The general and specific deterrent effect of DUI sanctions a review of California's experience. Alcohol Drugs Driving. 6:1991;33-60.