Lenses for learning: Visual techniques in natural resource management

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 92, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2734-2745

  Petheram, L ^a   High, C ^b   Campbell, B M ^c   Stacey, N ^a  

^a CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Indigenous; Participatory communication; Protected areas; Social learning; Visual methods

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; LEARNING; NATURAL RESOURCE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PROTECTED AREA; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUSTRALIA; COMMUNITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY; VIET NAM;

AUSTRIA; VIET NAM;

EID: 79960847843     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Argyris C., Schon D. Organisational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective 1978, Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass.
2. Aitken S., Wingate J. A preliminary study of the self-directed photography of middle-class, homeless, and mobility impaired children. The Professional Geographer 1993, 45:65-72.
3. Banks M. Visual Methods in Social Research 2001, Sage, London.
4. Bateson G., Mead M. Balinese Character: a Photographic Analysis 1942, Academy of Sciences, New York.
5. Becker H.S. Photography and sociology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1974, 1(1):1-26.
6. Bessette G. People, Land, and Water. Participatory Development Communication for Natural Resource Management Earthscan/IRDC 2006, Accessed at, (accessed 23.01.10.). http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-98617-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html.
7. Bodner G.M. Constructivism: a theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education 1986, 63:873-878.
8. Braden S. Using video for research and representation: basic human needs and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology 1999, 24(2):117-129.
9. Buckingham D. Video culture: an introduction. Journal of Educational Media 2009, 26(3):167-172.
10. Burke F.M. Citizen participation strategies. American Institute of Planning Journal 1968, 34:287-294.
11. Bussink C. GIS as a tool in participatory natural resource management. Examples from the Peruvian Andes Mountain Research and Development 2003, 23(4):320-323.
12. Busza J., Schunter B.T. From competition to community: participatory learning and action among young, debt-bonded Vietnamese sex workers in Cambodia. Reproductive Health Matters 2001, 9:72-81.
13. Carpenter Rinaldi D. Grounded theory research approach. Qualitative Research and in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative 1995, 145-161. J.B.Lippincott Company, Philadelphia. H.J. Streubert, D. Carpenter Rinaldi (Eds.).
14. Chambers R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 1994, 22(7):953-969.
15. Chambers R. Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last 1997, Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
16. Chambers R. The world development report: concepts, content, and a chapter 12. Journal of International Development 2001, 13(3):299-306.
17. Collier J., Collier M. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method 1991, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
18. Engel A., Korf B. Negotiation and Mediation Techniques for Natural Resource Management 2005, FAO, Rome.
19. Visual Culture. The Reader 1999, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. J. Evans, S. Hall (Eds.).
20. Using Video in the Field 1991, FAO, FAO, Rome.
21. Fernandez W.D. The Grounded Theory method and case study data in is research: Issues and design. Information Systems Foundations: Constructing and Criticising 2004, ANU E-Press, Canberra, Australia. D.N. Hart, S.D. Gregor (Eds.).
22. Frohman L. The framing safety project photographs and narratives by battered women. Violence Against Women 2005, 11(11):1396-1419.
23. Glaser B. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis 1992, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
24. Groot A., Maarleveld M. Demystifying Facilitation in Participatory Development 2000, Gatekeeper Series, Number 89, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.
25. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action 1984, Heinemann Education, London.
26. Harper D. Photography as social science data. A Companion to Qualitative Research 2004, Sage Publications, London. U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, I. Steinke (Eds.).
27. Harrison B. Photographic visions and narrative inquiry. Narrative Inquiry 2002, 12:87-111.
28. Huber, B., 1998. Communicative Aspects of Participatory Video Projects. An Exploratory Study. Masters thesis online. Accessed at: (accessed 07.10.09.). http://www.sol.slu.se/publications/masters_1.pdf.
29. Janis I.L. Groupthink 1982, revised, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. second ed.
30. Johansson L. Participatory video and PRA: acknowledging the politics of empowerment. Forests, Trees and People Newsletter 1999, 40/41:21-23.
31. Social Learning in Environmental Management. Towards a Sustainable Future 2005, Earthscan, London. M. Keen, V.A. Brown, R. Dyball (Eds.).
32. Kesby M. Participatory diagramming: deploying qualitative methods through an action research epistemology. Area 2000, 32(4):423-435.
33. Kindon S. Participatory video in geographic research: a feminist practice of looking?. Area 2003, 335(2):142-153.
34. King C., Jiggins J. A systemic model and theory for facilitating social learning. Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management 2002, 85-105. Royal van Gorcum, Assen. C. Leeuwis, R. Pyburn (Eds.).
35. Kitchener K.S. Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: a three level mode of cognitive processing. Human Development 1983, 4:222-232.
36. Kolb B. Involving, sharing, analysing - potential of the participatory photo interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2008, 9(3):12. Accessed at, (accessed 12.10.09.). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803127.
37. Laing J. Art therapy. Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine 1980, 3:84-91.
38. Leavy B.A., Wyeld T.G., Hills J., Barker C.I., Gard S. Digital songlines: digitising the arts, culture and heritage landscape of aboriginal Australia. New Heritage New Media and Cultural Heritage 2008, 294-303. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. Y. Kalay, T. Kvan, J. Affleck (Eds.).
39. Leeuwis C., Pyburn R., Boon A. Concluding reflections on social learning. Tadpoles, lilypads and lotus flowers. Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management 2002, 449-470. Royal van Gorcum, Assen. C. Leeuwis, R. Pyburn (Eds.).
40. Leeuwis C. Communication for Rural Innovation 2004, Rethinking agricultural extension Blackwell Science, Wageningen.
41. Leeuwis C. Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change 2000, 31:931-959.
42. Leeuwis C. The stimulation of development and innovation: reflection on projects, planning, participation and platforms. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 1995, 2(3):15-27.
43. Lewis J.L., Sheppard S.R.J. Culture and communication: can landscape visualisation improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77(3):291-313.
44. Lorenzi I., Nicholson-Cole S., Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 2007, 17:445-459.
45. Lunch N., Lunch C. Insight's into Participatory Video: a Handbook for the Field 2006, Insight, Oxford. first ed.
46. Mavrocordatos A. Theatre for Development, Participatory Monitoring and Cultural Feedback 1997, PLA Notes CD-ROM 1988-2001 (Chapter 6) PLA Notes 29, International Institute for Environment and Development IIED, London, pp. 29-33.
47. McCall M.K. Seeking good governance in participatory GIS: a review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Habitat International 2003, 27:549-573.
48. Merali Y. The role of boundaries in knowledge processes. European Journal of Information Systems 2002, 11(1):47-60.
49. Pauwels L. Filmed science in search of a form: contested discourses in anthropological and sociological. Film-making New Cinemas 2004, 2(1):41-60.
50. Petheram L., Campbell B.M. Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91(5):1139-1149.
51. Petheram L., Campbell B.M., High C., Stacey N. 'Strange changes': indigenous perspectives of climate change and adaptation in NE Arnhem Land (Australia). Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:681-692.
52. Petheram, L., Stacey, N., Campbell, B.M., High, C. Using visual products derived from community research to inform policy. Land Use Policy, in press.
53. Pijnenburg B. Community based natural resource management as dogma: a case from Mozambique. Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management 2002, 289-301. Royal van Gorcum, Assen. C. Leeuwis, R. Pyburn (Eds.).
54. Pink S. The Future of Visual Anthropology 2006, Routledge, Abingdon.
55. Visual Interventions: Applied Visual Anthropology 2007, Berghahn, Oxford. S. Pink (Ed.).
56. Prosser J. Image-based Research: a Handbook for Qualitative Researchers 1998, Falmer Press, London.
57. Rose G. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Interpreting Visual Objects 2000, Sage Publications, London.
58. Röling N. Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences-moving from multiple to distributed cognition in resource dilemmas. Wheelbarrows Full of Frogs: Social Learning in Rural Resource Management 2002, 25-47. Royal van Gorcum, Assen. C. Leeuwis, R. Pyburn (Eds.).
59. Schusler T.M., Decker D.J., Pfeffer M.J. Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 2003, 15:309-326.
60. Shaw J., Robertson C. Participatory Video: A Practical Approach to Using Video Creatively in Group Development Work 1997, Routledge, London.
61. Stadhams D. Look to learn a role for visual ethnography in the elimination of poverty. Visual Anthropology Review 2004, 20(1):45-58.
62. Umoquit M.J., Dobrow M.J., Lemieux-Charles L., Ritvo P.G., Urbach D.R., Wodchis W.P. The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation BMC. Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8:53.
63. Upreti B. Beyond rhetorical success: advancing the potential for the community forestry programme in Nepal to address equity concerns. Social Learning in Community Forests 2001, 189-205. (Chapter 10), Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor. E. Wollenberg, D. Edmunds, L. Buck, J. Fox, S. Brodt (Eds.).
64. Van Mele P. Zooming-in zooming-out: a novel method to scale up local innovations and sustainable technologies. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2006, 4(2):131-142.
65. Van der Riet M. Participatory research and the philosophy of social science: beyond the moral imperative. Qualitative Inquiry 2008, 14:546-565.
66. Wang C.C., Pies C.A. Family, maternal and child health through photovoice. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2004, 8(2):95-102.
67. White S.A. Participatory Video. Images that Transform and Empower 2003, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
68. Williams K.J.H., Ford R.M., Williams K.J.H., Bishop I.D., Webb T. Realism and selectivity in data-driven visualisations: a process for developing viewer-oriented landscape surrogates. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 81(3):213-224.
69. Williamson J. Family, Education and Photography 1987, 14. Ten-8, pp. 19-22.
70. Zander, K.K. Economic impact of climate change to livelihoods of coastal communities in northern Australia, unpublished.