Effects of environmental context on temporal perception bias in apparent motion

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 1728-1740

  Masuda, Tomohiro ^a   Kimura, Atsushi ^b   Dan, Ippeita ^c   Wada, Yuji ^a  

^a NATIONAL FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Event perception; Kappa effect; Space time dependency.

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DARK ADAPTATION; DECELERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GRAVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960837477     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abe S. Experimental study on the co-relation between time and space. Tohoku Psychologica Folia 1935, 3:53-68.
2. Bertamini M. Memory for position and dynamic representations. Memory and Cognition 1993, 21(4):449-457.
3. Cohen J., Hansel C.E.M., Sylvester J.D. A new phenomenon in time judgement. Nature, London 1953, 172:901.
4. Cohen J., Hansel C.E.M., Sylvester J.D. Interdependence in judgments of space, time and movement. Acta Psychologica 1955, 11:360-372.
5. Collyer C.E. Discrimination of spatial and temporal intervals defined by three light flashes: Effects of spacing on temporal judgments and of timing on spatial judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 1977, 21:357-364.
6. Efron R. The minimum duration of a perception. Neuropsychologia 1970, 8:57-63.
7. Freyd J.J., Finke R.A. Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10:126-132.
8. Gibson J.J. Events are perceivable but time is not. The study of time II 1975, 295-301. Springer-Verlag, New York. J.T. Fraser, N. Lawrence (Eds.).
9. Hubbard T.L. Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1995, 2:322-338.
10. Hubbard T.L. The effect of height in the picture plane on the forward displacement of ascending and descending targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 55(4):325-329.
11. Hubbard T.L. The perception of causality: Insights from Michotte's launching effect, naïve impetus theory, and representational momentum. Fechner day 2004 2004, 116-121. The International Society for Psychophysics, Coimbra, Portugal. A.M. Oliveira, M.P. Teixeira, G.F. Borges, M.J. Ferro (Eds.).
12. Hubbard T.L. Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12(5):822-851.
13. Hubbard T.L. Representational momentum as a new Gestalt principle. Fechner day 2008 2008, 333-338. The International Society for Psychophysics, Toronto, CA. B.A. Schneider, B.M. Ben-David, S. Parker, W. Wong (Eds.).
14. Hubbard T.L., Bharucha J.J. Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception and Psychophysics 1988, 44(3):211-221.
15. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, Vol. 1. Holt, New York.
16. Jingu, H. (1999). Time perception (S-effect) based on implicit knowledge. In The proceedings of the 63rd annual convention of the Japanese psychological association (p. 439) (in Japanese).
17. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
18. Jones B., Huang Y.L. Space-time dependencies in psychological judgment of extent and duration: Algebraic model of the tau and kappa effects. Psychological Bulletin 1982, 91:128-142.
19. Kanisza, G. (1991). Vedere e pensare, Il Mulino, Bologna.
20. Kersten D., Mamassian P., Knill D.C. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception 1997, 26(2):171-192.
21. Kozhevnikov M., Hegarty M. Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8(3):439-453.
22. Lebensfeld P., Wapner S. Configuration and space-time interdependence. American Journal of Psychology 1968, 81:106-110.
23. Michotte A. The perception of causality 1963, (T.R. Miles & E.Miles, Translation; original work published 1946), Basic Books, New York.
24. Newman C.V., Lee S.G. The effect of real and imputed distance on judgments of time: Some experiments on the kappa effect. Psychonomic Science 1972, 29:207-211.
25. Noguchi K., Kitaoka A., Takashima M. Gestalt-oriented perceptual research in Japan: Past and present. Gestalt Theory 2008, 30:11-28.
26. Price-Williams D.R. The kappa effect. Nature 1954, 173:363-364.
27. Raymond J.E. Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research 1994, 34(8):1029-1037.
28. Runeson S. Constant velocity: Not perceived as such. Psychological Research 1974, 37:3-23.
29. Sarrazin J.C., Giraudo M.D., Pailhous J., Bootsma R.J. Tau and kappa effects revisited: Dynamics of balancing space and time in Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(3):411-430.
30. Tresilian J.R. Visually timed action: Time-out for 'tau'?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(8):301-310.
31. Tse P.U., Intriligator J., Rivest J., Cavanah P. Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception and Psychophysics 2004, 66(7):1171-1189.
32. Wertheimer M. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrigt für Psychologie 1912, 61:161-265.
33. Zakay D., Block R.A. Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1997, 6:12-16.