Psychometric characteristics of Duruoz Hand Index in patients with traumatic hand flexor tendon injuries

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 17-18, 2011, Pages 1521-1527

  Erçalik, Tülay ^a   Şahin, Füsun ^b   Erçalik, Cem ^c   Doǧu, Beril ^a   Dalgiç, Serap ^a   Kuran, Banu ^a  

^a SISLI ETFAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^c AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Duru z Hand Index; tendon and hand; Traumatic hand injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HAND INJURY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TENDON INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HAND INJURIES; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TENDON INJURIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79960816656     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.533244     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. World Health Organization. ICF: International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
2. Duruöz MT, Poiraudeau S, Fermanian J, Menkes CJ, Amor B, Dougados M, Revel M. Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1167-1172.
3. Poole JL, Cordova KJ, Brower LM. Reliability and validity of a self-report of hand function in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Ther 2006;19;12-16.
4. Şahin F, Kotevoǧlu N, Taşpinar Ş, Yilmaz F, Kuran B. Comparison of functional disability scales and their relevance to radiological progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission. Clin Exp Rheum 2006;24:540-545. (Pubitemid 44911248)
5. Poiraudeau S, Chevalier X, Conrozier T, Flippo RM, Lioté F, Noël E, Lefevre-Colau MM, Fermanian J, Revel M, Rhumato R. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2001;9:570-577. (Pubitemid 32842636)
6. Brower LM, Poole JL. Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:805-809. (Pubitemid 39372040)
7. Ingegnoli F, Galbiati V, Boracchi P, Comi D, Gualtierotti R, Zeni S, Fantini F. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the hand functional disability scale in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol 2008;27:743-749. (Pubitemid 351650033)
8. Duruöz MT, Cerrahoǧlu L, Dinçer-Turan Y, Kürsat S. Hand function assessment in patients receiving haemodialysis. Swiss Med Wkly 2003;133:433-438. (Pubitemid 37247850)
9. Sezer N, Yavuzer G, Sivrioǧlu K, Basaran P, Köseoǧlu BF. Clinimetric properties of the Duruoz Hand Index in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:309-314. (Pubitemid 46281850)
10. Turan Y, Duruöz MT, Aksakalli E, Gürkan A. Validation of Duruöz Hand Index for diabetic hand dysfunction. J Investig Med 2009;57:887-891.
11. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand).AmJ IndMed1996;29:602-608. (Pubitemid 26172396)
12. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14:128-146. (Pubitemid 32463650)
13. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG, McGillivary GR. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27:537-541. (Pubitemid 34522585)
14. Offenbaecher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol 2002;29: 401-402. (Pubitemid 34118799)
15. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:613-618.
16. http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/assets/images/pdfs/dashturkish.pdf
17. Fess EE. Grip strength. In: Casanova JS, editor. Clinical assessment recommendations. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists; 1992. pp 41-46.
18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. Apractical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
19. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033-1039. (Pubitemid 44376776)
20. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:335-341. (Pubitemid 38453296)
21. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42. (Pubitemid 44856236)
22. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81 (12 Suppl 2):S15-S20.
23. Guyatt GH, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 1987;40:171-178. (Pubitemid 17007065)
24. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Controlled Clin Trials 1991;12 (Suppl):142S-158S.
25. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;16: 4-11.
26. van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90: 151-169.
27. MacDermid JC. Measurement of health outcomes following tendon and nerve repair. J Hand Ther 2005;18:297-312. (Pubitemid 40569585)
28. Dowrick AS, Gabbe BJ, Williamson OD, Cameron PA. Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review. Injury 2005;36:468-476. (Pubitemid 40332328)
29. Powell R, Wietlisbach C. Clinical commentary in response to: clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation. J Hand Ther 2009;22:237-239.
30. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:575-587. (Pubitemid 29098706)
31. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). Am J Ind Med 1996;29: 602-608. (Pubitemid 26172396)
32. MacDermid JC, Tottenham V. Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 2004;17:18-23. (Pubitemid 38222711)
33. Heras-Palou C, Burke FD, Dias JJ, Bindra R. Outcome measurement in hand surgery: report of a consensus conference. Br J Hand Ther 2003;8:70-80. (Pubitemid 36810202)
34. Bellace JV, Healy D, Besser MP, Byron T, Hohman L. Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System's Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population. J Hand Ther 2000;13:46-51. (Pubitemid 30134136)
35. Lagerstrom C, Nordgren B. On the reliability and usefulness of methods for grip strength measurement. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:113-119. (Pubitemid 28206980)
36. Shechtman O, Davenport R, Malcolm M, Nabavi D. Reliability and validity of the BTE-Primus grip tool. J Hand Ther 2003;16:36-42. (Pubitemid 36231854)
37. Soyupek F, Soyupek S, Perk H, Özorak A. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: effects on hand function. Urol Oncol 2008;26:141-146. (Pubitemid 351288555)
38. Savaş S, Köroǧlu BK, Koyuncuoǧlu HR, Uzar E, Çelik H, Tamer NM. The effects of the diabetes related soft tissue hand lesions and the reduced hand strength on functional disability of hand in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007;77:77-83. (Pubitemid 46590476)
39. Duruöz MT. Romatoid El Fonksiyonel Yetersizlik Gö stergesinin Klinik Deǧişime Duyarliliǧi. Turk J Phys Rehab 1999;45. URL: http://www.ftrdergisi.com/eng/yazilar.asp?yaziid=258&sayiid=30
40. MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth JH. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-ratedwrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand SurgAm2000;25:330- 340. (Pubitemid 30165598)
41. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30:81-86. (Pubitemid 40186873)
42. Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:2.