Interaction design gone wild: Striving for wild theory

Interactions

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 58-62

  Rogers, Yvonne ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY; IMPROVE-A; INTERACTION DESIGN; TECHNICAL EXPERTISE;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

DESIGN;

EID: 79960809234     PISSN: 10725520     EISSN: 15583449     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1978822.1978834     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Rogers, Y ., Connelly, K., T edesco, L., Hazlewood, W., Kurtz, A., Hall, B., Hursey, J., and T oscos, T Why it's worth the hassle: The value of in-situ studies when designing UbiComp. UbiComp 2007. J. Krumm et al., eds. LNCS 4717, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, 336-353.
2. Norman, D. Four (more) issues for cognitive science. Cognitive Science Technical Report No. 9001. Department of Cognitive S cience, University of California, San Diego, 1990.
3. Rogers, Y New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annual Review of Information, Science and Technology 38 (2004), 87-143.
4. Plowman, L., Rogers, Y ., and Ramage, M. What are workplace studies for? Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995, 309-324.
5. Kraut, R.E. Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. J. Carroll, ed. Morgan- Kaufmann, New York, 2003, 325-356.
6. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995.
7. Winograd, T and Flores, F. Understanding ComputerSand Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, New York, 1986.
8. Suchman, L. PlanSand Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
9. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001.
10. Marshall, P., Hornecker, E. Hurtienne, J., and Rogers, Y UseSand varieties of embodiment in HCI. In prep.
11. Robertson, T Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied actions. Proc. of the 5th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997, 205-220.
12. Antle, A.N. Embodied child computer interaction: Why embodiment matters. interactions 16, 2 (2009), 27-30.
13. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004.
14. Gigerenzer, G ., Todd, P. M., and the ABC Research G roup. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
15. Todd, P., Rogers, Y ., and Payne, S Nudging the trolley in the supermarket: How to deliver the right information to shoppers. International Journal on Mobile HCI (IJMHCI) 3, 2 (2011), 20-34.
16. Ballendat, T ., Marquardt, N., and G reenberg, S. Proxemic interaction: Designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. Proc. of ITS '10: International Conference on Interactive TabletopSand Surfaces. ACM, New York, 2010, 121-130.
17. Chen, F. Design Mindfulness. 2011; http://www.designmindfulness.com/
18. Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y ., Kreitmayer, S., and Davies, M. Rethinking 'multi-user': An in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. Proc. of the 29th International Conference, Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7-12). ACM, New York, 2011.
19. Yuill, N. and Rogers, Y Mechanisms for collaboration: A design and evaluation framework for multi-user interfaces. 2011. Manuscript in review.