Communicative functions integrate segments in prosodies and prosodies in segments

Phonetica

Volumn 68, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 26-56

  Kohler, Klaus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COMMUNICATION; GERMANY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960807623     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000328433     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abramson, A.; L-Thongkum, Th.: Voice register in Suai (Kuai): an analysis of perceptual and acoustic data. Phonetica 61: 147-171 (2004). (Pubitemid 40251100)
2. Arvaniti, A.: Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica 66: 46-63 (2009).
3. Arvaniti, A.; Ladd, D.R.; Mennen, I.: Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents. J. Phonet. 26: 3-25 (1998). (Pubitemid 128179448)
4. Barry, W.; Andreeva, B.; Koreman, J.: Do rhythm measures reflect perceived rhythm? Phonetica 66: 78-94 (2009).
5. Baumann, S.; Becker, J.; Grice, M.; Mücke, D.: Tonal and articulatory marking of focus in German. Proc. 16th ICPhS, Saarbrücken 2007, pp. 1029-1032.
6. Bergem, D. van: Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class on the quality of vowels. Speech Commun. 12: 1-23 (1993).
7. Bruce, G.: Swedish word accents in sentence perspective (CWK Gleerup, Lund 1977).
8. Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences; 2nd ed. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1988).
9. Cumming, R.: The interdependence of tonal and durational cues in the perception of rhythmic groups. Phonetica 67: 219-242 (2010).
10. Cumming, R.: The language-specific interdependence of tonal and durational cues in perceived rhythmicality. Phonetica 68: 1-25 (2011).
11. Firth, J.R.: Sounds and prosodies. Trans. Philological Soc. 1948: 127-152 (1948).
12. Fry, D.B.: Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 27: 765-768 (1955).
13. Fry, D.B.: Experiments in the perception of stress. Lang. Speech 1: 126-152 (1958).
14. Fry, D.B.: The dependence of stress judgments on vowel formant structure; in Zwirner, Bethge, Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Phonetic Sci., pp. 306-311 (Karger, Basel 1965).
15. Gärding, E.: Sentence intonation in Swedish. Phonetica 36: 207-215 (1979). (Pubitemid 10233484)
16. Gärding, E.: Swedish prosody: summary of a project. Phonetica 39: 288-301 (1982).
17. Gartenberg, R.; Panzlaff-Reuter, C.: Production and perception of F0 peak patterns in German. Arbeitsber. Inst. Phonetik Univ. Kiel (AIPUK) 25: 29-113 (1991).
18. Grabe, E.: Comparative intonational phonology: English and German; PhD thesis University of Nijmegen (1998).
19. Grabe, E.; Gussenhoven, C.; Haan, J.; Marsi, E.; Post, B.: Preaccentual pitch and speaker attitude in Dutch. Lang. Speech 41: 63-85 (1997).
20. Grønnum, N.: The groundworks of Danish intonation -an introduction. Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen 1992.
21. Hawkins, S.: Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. J. Phonet. 31: 373-405 (2003). (Pubitemid 37495914)
22. Hawkins, S.; Smith, R.: Polysp: a polysystemic, phonetically-rich approach to speech understanding. Ital. J. Ling. 13: 99-188 (2001).
23. Honikman, B.: Articulatory settings; in Abercrombie, Fry, MacCarthy, Scott, Trim, In honour of Daniel Jones, pp. 73-84 (Longman, London 1964).
24. Huggins, A.W.F.: Just noticeable differences for segment duration in natural speech. J. acoust. Soc. 51; 1270-1278 (1972).
25. IPDS: The Kiel corpus of spontaneous speech, vol. 1, 2, CD-ROM No. 2, 3 (IPDS, Kiel 1995/1996).
26. Isačenko, A.V.; Schädlich, H.-J.: Untersuchungen ücer die deutsche Satzintonation. Studia Grammatica VII, pp. 7-67 (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1966).
27. Kohler, K.J.: Modelling prosody in spontaneous speech; in Sagisaka, Campbell, Higuchi, Computing prosody. Computational models for processing spontaneous speech, pp. 187-210 (Springer, New York 1996).
28. Kohler, K.J.: Articulatory prosodies in German reduced speech. Proc. 14th ICPhS, vol. 1, pp. 89-92, San Francisco 1999.
29. Kohler, K.J.: Pragmatic and attitudinal meanings of pitch patterns in German syntactically marked questions; in Fant, Fujisaki, Cao, Xu, From traditional phonology to modern speech processing. Festschr. for Professor Wu Zongji's 95th Birthday, pp. 205-214 (Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing 2004).
30. Kohler, K.J.: Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours. Phonetica 62: 88-105 (2005). (Pubitemid 43030006)
31. Kohler, K.J.: What is emphasis and how is it coded? Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Speech Prosody, Dresden 2006a, pp. 748-751.
32. Kohler, K.J.: Paradigms in experimental prosodic analysis: from measurement to function; in Sudhoff, Lenertovüc Meyer, Pappert, Augurzky, Mleinek, Richter, Schließer, Methods in Empirical Prosody Research, pp. 123-152 (de Gruyter, Berlin 2006b).
33. Kohler, K.J.: Rhythm in speech and language: a new research paradigm. Phonetica 66: 29-45 (2009a).
34. Kohler, K.J.: Patterns of prosody in the expression of the speaker and the appeal to the listener; in Fant, Fujisaki, Shen, Frontiers in phonetics and speech science, pp. 287-302 (The Commercial Press, Beijing 2009b).
35. Kohler, K.J.; Niebuhr, O.: The phonetics of emphasis. Proc. 16th ICPhS, Saarbrücken 2007, pp. 2145-2148.
36. Kohler, K.J.; Niebuhr, O.: On the role of articulatory prosodies in German message decoding. Phonetica 68: 57-87 (2011).
37. Ladd, D.R.: Intonational phonology (CUP, Cambridge 1996).
38. Ladd, D.R.; Faulkner, D.; Faulkner, H.; Schepman, A.: Constant 'segmental anchoring' of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 106: 1543-1554 (1999).
39. Ladd, D.R.; Mennen, I.; Schepman, A.: Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 107: 2685-2696 (2000). (Pubitemid 30304914)
40. Ladefoged, P.: Three areas of experimental phonetics (Oxford University Press, London 1967).
41. Laver, J.: The phonetic description of voice quality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1980).
42. Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modelling, pp. 403-439 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1990).
43. Lindblom, B.; Maddieson, I.: Phonetic universals in consonant system; in Hyman, Li, Language, speech and mind, pp. 62-78 (Routledge, London 1988).
44. MacNeilage, P.: The origin of speech (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008).
45. Mücke, D.; Grice, M.; Becker, J.; Hermes, A.: Sources of variation in tonal alignment: evidence from acoustic and kinematic data. J. Phonet. 37: 321-338 (2009).
46. Niebuhr, O.: The signalling of German rising-falling intonation categories -the interplay of synchronization, shape, and height. Phonetica 64: 174-191 (2007).
47. Niebuhr, O.: Coding of intonational meanings beyond F0: evidence from utterance-final /t/ aspiration in German. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 124: 1252-1263 (2008).
48. Niebuhr, O.: Fundamental frequency-based rhythm effects on the perception of local syllable prominence. Phonetica 66: 95-112 (2009a).
49. Niebuhr, O.: Intonation segments and segmental intonations. Proc. 10th Interspeech Conf., Brighton 2009b, pp. 2435-2438.
50. Niebuhr, O.: On the phonetics of intensifying emphasis in German. Phonetica 67: 170-198 (2010).
51. Niebuhr, O.; Kohler, K.J.: Perception of phonetic detail in the identification of highly reduced words. J. Phonet. (in press).
52. Nolan, F.; Asu, E.L.: The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica 66: 64-77 (2009).
53. O'Connor, J.D.; Arnold, G.F.: Intonation of colloquial English (Longmans, London 1961).
54. Ohala, J.: Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40: 1-18 (1983).
55. Ohala, J.: An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of f0 of voice. Phonetica 41: 1-16 (1984). (Pubitemid 14120527)
56. Osgood, C.E.; Suci, G.J.; Tannenbaum, P.H.: The measurement of meaning (University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1957).
57. Port, R.F.: All is prosody: phones and phonemes are the ghosts of letters. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Speech Prosody, Campinas 2008.
58. Sluijter, A.M.C.; van Heuven, V.J.: Effects of focus distribution, pitch accent and lexical stress on the temporal organisation of syllables in Dutch. Phonetica 52: 71-89 (1995).
59. Sluijter, A.M.C.; van Heuven, V.J.: Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 100: 2471-2485 (1996).
60. Sluijter, A.M.C.; van Heuven, V.J.; Pacilly, J.J.A.: Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 503-513 (1997). (Pubitemid 27026662)
61. Vaihinger, H.: Die Philosophie des Als Ob (Meiner, Leipzig 1920).
62. Translated by C.K. Ogden, The philosophy of 'as if' (Routledge & Kegan, London 1924).