A stochastic model of knee angle in response to electrical stimulation of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1169-1174

  Lynch, Cheryl L ^a,b   Popovic, Milos R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Functional electrical stimulation; Knee; Model; Spinal cord injury; Stochastic

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION; MUSCLE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

CONDITION; DISTRIBUTED RANDOM VARIABLES; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRI-CAL STIMULATIONS; KNEE; MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATIONS; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STOCHASTIC-MODELING; STOCHASTICS; UNCERTAINTY;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HAMSTRING MUSCLE; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE ANGLE; MUSCLE EXCITATION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; SIMULATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STOCHASTIC MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; QUADRICEPS MUSCLE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 79960806786     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01228.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kralj A, Bajd T, Turk R. Enhancement of gait restoration in spinal injured patients by functional electrical stimulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;223:34–43.
2. Popovic DB, Stojanovic A, Pjanovic A, et al. Clinical evaluation of the bionic glove. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:299–304.
3. Popovic MR, Thrasher TA, Adams ME, et al. Functional electrical therapy: retraining grasping in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2006;44:143–51.
4. Thorsen R, Spadone R, Ferrarin M. A pilot study of myoelectrically controlled FES of upper extremity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001;9:161–8.
5. Kilgore KL, Hoyen HA, Bryden AM, et al. An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control. J Hand Surg 2008;33A:539–50.
6. Memberg WD, Crago PE, Keith MW. Restoration of elbow extension via functional electrical stimulation in individuals with tetraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40:477–86.
7. Matjacic Z, Bajd T. Arm-free paraplegic standing—Part II: experimental results. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998;6:139–50.
8. Gollee H, Hunt KJ, Wood DE. New results in feedback control of unsupported standing in paraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004;12:73–80.
9. Fisher LE, Miller ME, Bailey SN, et al. Standing after spinal cord injury with four-contact nerve-cuff electrodes for quadriceps stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008;16:473–8.
10. Cikajlo I, Matjacic Z, Bajd T, et al. Sensory supported FES control in gait training of incomplete spinal cord injury persons. Artif Organs 2005;29:459–61.
11. Fuhr T, Quintern J, Riener R, et al. Walking with WALK! A cooperative patient-driven neuroprosthetic system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008;27:38–48.
12. Vanoncini M, Holderbaum W, Andrews B. Development and experimental identification of a biomechanical model of the trunk for functional electrical stimulation control in paraplegia. Neuromodulation 2008;11:315–24.
13. Triolo RJ, Boggs L, Miller ME, et al. Implanted electrical stimulation of the trunk for seated postural stability and function after cervical spinal cord injury: a single case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;20:340–7.
14. Chao CY, Cheing GL. The effects of lower-extremity functional electric stimulation on the orthostatic responses of people with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1427–33.
15. Chi L, Masani K, Miyatani M, et al. Cardiovascular response to functional electrical stimulation and dynamic tilt table therapy to improve orthostatic tolerance. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008;18:900–7.
16. Popovic DB, Sinkjaer T. Control of Movement for the Physically Disabled. London: Springer Inc., 2000.
17. Hatwell MS, Oderkerk BJ, Sacher CA, et al. The development of a model reference adaptive controller to control the knee joint of paraplegics. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 1991;36:683–91.
18. Previdi F. Identification of black-box nonlinear models for lower limb movement control using functional electrical stimulation. Control Eng Pract 2002;10:91–9.
19. Ferrarin M, Pedotti A. The relationship between electrical stimulus and joint torque: a dynamic model. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:342–52.
20. Perumal R, Wexler AS, Binder-Macleod SA. Mathematical model that predicts lower leg motion in response to electrical stimulation. J Biomech 2006;39:2826–36.
21. Schauer T, Negard NO, Previdi F, et al. Online identification and nonlinear control of the electrically stimulated quadriceps muscle. Control Eng Pract 2005;13:1207–19.
22. Riener R, Quintern J, Schmidt G. Biomechanical model of the human knee evaluated by neuromuscular stimulation. J Biomech 1996;29:1157–67.
23. Brinkmann JR, Perry J. Rate and range of knee motion during ambulation in healthy and arthritic subjects. Phys Ther 1985;65:1055–60.
24. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, et al. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
25. Matthews JH, Fink KD. Numerical Methods Using MatLab, 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.