Semipermeable hollow fiber phantoms for development and validation of perfusion-sensitive mr methods and signal models

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering

Volumn 39 B, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 149-158

  Anderson, J R ^a   Ackerman, J J H ^a,b   Garbow, J R ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dialyzer; Hollow fiber bioreactor; MR phantom design; Perfusion; Semi permeable hollow fiber

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960791256     PISSN: 15525031     EISSN: 1552504X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20202     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wang Y, Kim SE, DiBella EV, Parker DL. 2010. Flow measurement in MRI using arterial spin labeling with cumulative readout pulses-theory and validation. Med Phys 37: 5801-5810.
2. Osuga T, Obata T, Ikehira H. 2004. Detection of small degree of nonuniformity in dialysate flow in hollow-fiber dialyzer using proton magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 22: 417-420.
3. Osuga T, Obata T, Ikehira H. 2004. Proton magnetic resonance imaging of flow motion of heavy water injected into a hollow fiber dialyzer filled with saline. Magn Reson Imaging 22: 413-416.
4. Hardy PA, Poh CK, Liao Z, Clark WR, Gao D. 2002. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to measure the local ultrafiltration rate in hemodialyzers. J Membr Sci 204: 195-205.
5. Laukemper-Ostendorf S, Lemke HD, Blümler P, Blümich B. 1998. NMR imaging of flow in hollow fiber hemodialyzers. J Membr Sci 138: 287-295.
6. Pangrle BJ, Walsh EG, Moore S, DiBiasio D. 1989. Investigation of fluid flow patterns in a hollow fiber module using magnetic resonance velocity imaging. Biotechnol Tech 3: 67-72.
7. Poh CK, Hardy PA, Liao Z, Clark WR, Gao D, Dibakar B, et al. 2003. Membrane Science and Technology Series. New Insights into Membrane Science and Technology: Polymeric and Biofunctional Membranes. Dibakar Bhattacharyya and D. Allan Butterfield Editors. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 89-122.
8. Zhang J, Parker DL, Leypoldt JK. 1995. Flow distributions in hollow fiber hemodialyzers using magnetic resonance Fourier velocity imaging. ASAIO J 41: M678-M682.
9. Heese F, Robson P, Hall LD. 2005. Quantification of fluid flow through a clinical blood filter and kidney dialyzer using magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Sens J 5: 273-276.
10. Poh CK, Hardy PA, Liao Z, Huang Z, Clark WR, Gao D. 2003. Effect of flow baffles on the dialysate flow distribution of hollow-fiber hemodialyzers: a nonintrusive experimental study using MRI. J Biomech Eng 125: 481-489.
11. Poh CK, Hardy PA, Liao Z, Huang Z, Clark WR, Gao D. 2003. Effect of spacer yarns on the dialysate flow distribution of hemodialyzers: a magnetic resonance imaging study. ASAIO J 49: 440-448.
12. Donoghue C, Brideau M, Newcomer P, Pangrle B, DiBiasio D, Walsh E, et al. 1992. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to analyze the performance of hollow-fiber bioreactors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 665: 285-300.
13. Galons JP, Lope-Piedrafita S, Divijak JL, Corum C, Gillies RJ, Trouard TP. 2005. Uncovering of intracellular water in cultured cells. Magn Reson Med 54: 79-86.
14. Thelwall PE, Neves AA, Brindle KM. 2001. Measurement of bioreactor perfusion using dynamic contrast agent-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Biotechnol Bioeng 75: 682-690.
15. Heilmann M, Vautier J, Robert P, Volk A. 2009. In vitro setup to study permeability characteristics of contrast agents by MRI. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 4: 66-72.
16. Planchamp C, Gex-Fabry M, Dornier C, Quadri R, Reist M, Ivancevic MK, et al. 2004. Gd-BOPTA transport into rat hepatocytes: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance images using a hollow-fiber bioreactor. Invest Radiol 39: 506-515.
17. Van As H, Lens P. 2001. Use of 1H NMR to study transport processes in porous biosystems. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 26: 43-52.
18. Ebrahimi B, Swanson SD, Chupp TE. 2010. A microfabricated phantom for quantitative MR perfusion measurements: validation of singular value decomposition deconvolution method. IEEE Biomed Eng 57: 2730-2736.
19. Bretthorst GL, Hutton WC, Garbow JR, Ackerman JJH. 2005. Exponential parameter estimation (in NMR) using Bayesian probability theory. Concepts Magn Reson Part A 27: 55-63.
20. Dafni H, Landsman L, Schechter B, Kohen F, Neeman M. 2002. MRI and fluorescence microscopy of the acute vascular response to VEGF165: vasodilation, hyper-permeability and lymphatic uptake, followed by rapid inactivation of the growth factor. NMR Biomed 15: 120-131.
21. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou ZJ. 2004. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Amsterdam, Boston: Academic Press. p 1017.
22. Jackson A, Buckley D, Parker GJM, eds. 2003. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology. Berlin, New York: Springer.
23. Anderson JR, Ye Q, Neil JJ, Ackerman JJH, Garbow JR. 2011. Diffusion effects on longitudinal relaxation in poorly mixed compartments. J Magn Reson 211: 30-36.