Progress on stabilizing and controlling powered upper-limb prostheses

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Walley Williams, T ^a  

^a Liberating Technologies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGNOSIA; ARM AMPUTATION; ARM MOVEMENT; ARM PROSTHESIS; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; BIOSENSOR; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROL SYSTEM; EDITORIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYE TRACKING; HAND; HUMAN; IMPLANT; JOINT MOBILITY; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR COORDINATION; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; PATTERN RECOGNITION; POWER SUPPLY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; WRIST;

ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; FORECASTING; HUMANS; NEUROFEEDBACK; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 79960753830     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.04.0078     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Farry KA. Phantom limb development in congenitally upper limb deficient individuals. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21(3):145-55. DOI:10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181b15dff
2. Nielsen JL, Holmgaard S, Jiang N, Englehart KB, Farina D, Parker PA. Simultaneous and proportional estimation for multifunction myoelectric prostheses using mirrored bilateral training. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58(5):681-88. DOI:10.1109/TBME.2010.2068298
3. Kyberd PJ, Lemaire ED, Scheme E, MacPhail C, Goudreau L, Bush G, Brookeshaw M. Two-degree-of-freedom powered prosthetic wrist. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):609-18. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.07.0137
4. Kyberd PJ, Poulton A, Sandsjö L, Jönsson S, Jones B, Gow D. The ToMPAW modular prosthesis: A platform for research in upper-limb prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot. 2007;19(1):15-21. DOI:10.1097/JPO.0b013e31802d46f8
5. Weir RF, Troyk PR, DeMichele G, Kuiken T. Implantable myoelectric sensors (IMES) for upper-extremity prosthesis control-Preliminary work. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS); 2003 Sep 17-21; Cancun, Mexico. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE EMBS; 2003. p. 1562-65.
6. Simon AM, Hargrove LJ, Lock BA, Kuiken TA. Target Achievement Control Test: Evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6): 619-28. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0149
7. Corbett EA, Perreault EJ, Kuiken TA. Comparison of electromyography and force as interfaces for prosthetic control. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):629-42. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.03.0028
8. Scheme E, Englehart K. Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: State of the art and challenges for clinical use. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):643-60. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0177
9. Lipschutz RD, Lock B, Sensinger J, Schultz AE, Kuiken TA. Use of two-axis joystick for control of externally powered shoulder disarticulation prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):661-68. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0072
10. Williams TW. Electric control using relative body motion. In: Proceedings of the Myoelectric Controls (MEC) '94 Symposium; 1994; Fredericton, Canada. Fredericton, Canada: Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick; 1994. p. 60-75.
11. Williams TW. Control of powered upper extremity prostheses. In: Atkins DJ, Meier RH, editors. Functional restoration of adults and children with upper extremity amputation. New York (NY): Demos Medical; 2004. p. 207-24.
12. Losier Y, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Evaluation of shoulder complex motion-based input strategies for endpoint prosthetic-limb control using a dual-task paradigm. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):669-78. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0165
13. Winter WG, Carlson LE. Implementation of extended physiological proprioception for prosthesis control. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987;25(1):45.
14. Doubler J, Childress DS. Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1984;21(1):19-31.
15. Simpson DC. The choice of control system for the multimovement prosthesis: Extended physiological proprioception (EPP). In: Herberts P, Kadefors R, Magnusson R, Petersen I, editors. The control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses. Springfield (IL): Charles Thomas; 1974. p. 146-50.
16. Alley RD, Williams TW III, Albuquerque MJ, Altobelli DE. Prosthetic sockets stabilized by alternating areas of tissue compression and release. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):679-96.
17. Resnik L. Development and testing of new upper-limb prosthetic devices: Research designs for usability testing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):697-706.
18. Brånemark R, Brånemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(2): 175-81.
19. Witsø E, Kristensen T, Benum P, Sivertsen S, Persen L, Funderud A, Magne T, Aursand HP, Aamodt A. Improved comfort and function of arm prosthesis after implantation of a Humerus-T-Prosthesis in trans-humeral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006; 30(3):270-78.
20. Rouse EJ, Nahlik DC, Peshkin MA, Kuiken TA. Development of a model osseo-magnetic link for intuitive rotational control of upper-limb prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011;19(2): 213-20. DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2102365
21. Dragon naturally speaking [Internet]. Burlington (MA): Nuance Communications, Inc; 2011. Available from: www.nuance.com.
22. Farry KA, Kramer LA, Gupta RG, Atkins DJ, Donovan WH. Magnetic resonance imaging of congenitally deficient upper limbs. In: Proceedings of the Myoelectric Controls (MEC) '99 Symposium; 1999; Fredericton, Canada. Frederickton, Canada: Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick; 1999. p. 87-93.