Automatic design of detection tests in complex dynamic systems

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 16, Issue , 2005, Pages 478-483

  Ploix, Stéphane ^a   Désinde, Matthieu ^a   Touaf, Samir ^a  

^a GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

Detection algorithms design; Dynamic systems; Fault detection; Fault diagnosis

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC DESIGN; COMPLEX DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; DETECTABILITY; DETECTION ALGORITHM; DETECTION ALGORITHMS DESIGN; GENERAL METHOD; MATHEMATICAL RELATION; PARITY SPACES; STATE OBSERVER;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; CONTROL; DESIGN; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; SENSORS; SIGNAL DETECTION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 79960707867     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Blanke, M., M. Kinnaert, J. Lunze and M. Staroswiecki (2003). Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
2. Boutobza, A. (2003). "Génération automatique des tests de détection pour le diagnostic de systèmes physiques complexes." Laboratoire d'Automatique de Grenoble, Grenoble.
3. Cordier, M.-O., P. Dague, M. Dumas, F. Lévy, J. Montmain, M. Staroswiecki, and L. Travémassuyès (2000). A comparative analysis of AI and control theory approaches to model-based diagnosis. 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, Germany.
4. Declerck, P., and M. Staroswiecki (1991). Characterization of the canonical components of a structural graph for fault detection in large scale industrial plants. European Control Conference, Grenoble, France.
5. Dulmage, A. L. and N. S. Mendelsohn (1959). A structure theory of bi-partite graphs of finite exterior extension, Transaction of Royal Society of Canada, Section III, vol. 53, pp. 1-13.
6. Frisk, E. (2000). Residual Generator Design for Non-linear, Polynomial Systems - A Gröbner Basis Approach. IFAC Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes, Budapest, Hungary.
7. Garcia-Beltram, C., S. Lesecq, and R. Stücher (2003). Diagnosis of a hydraulic looper and a hot rolling mill main drive in a multiagent framework. IAR-ICD/IFATIS/MAGIC Workshop on Advanced Control and Diagnosis - ACD 2003, Duisburg.
8. Iwasaki, Y., and H. A. Simo (1994). Causality and model abstraction. Artificial Intelligence, 67, pp. 143-194.
9. Köppen-Seliger, B., S. X. Ding, and P. M. Frank (2002). MAGIC - IFATIS: EC-Research Projects. 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain.
10. Nyberg, M., and M. Krysander (2003). Combining AI, FDI, and Statistical Hypothesis-Testing in a Framework for Diagnosis. IFAC Safeprocess'03, Washington, U.S.A.
11. Patton, R., P. Frank, and R. Clark (Eds) (1989). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems, Prentice Hall.
12. Ploix, S., and C. Follot (2001). Fault diagnosis reasoning for set-membership approaches and application. CCA/ISIC'01, Mexico City, Mexico.
13. Ploix, S., S. Touaf, and J.-M. Flaus (2003). A logical framework for isolation in fault diagnosis. SAFEPROCESS'2003, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
14. Reiter, R. (1987). A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence, 32, pp. 57-95.
15. Staroswiecki, M. and P. Declerck (1989). Analytical redundancy in nonlinear interconnected systems by means of structural analysis, IFAC AIPAC'89 Symposium, Nantes, France.