Least disturbing closed-loop identification experiment for control

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 524-529

  Bombois, X ^a   Scorletti, G ^b   Van Den Hof, P ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

Experiment design; Prediction error identification for control

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP IDENTIFICATION; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; PREDICTION ERROR IDENTIFICATIONS;

EID: 79960706761     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.00088     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bombois, X., G. Scorletti, M. Gevers, R. Hildebrand and P. Van den Hof (2004). Cheapest open-loop identification experiment for control. In: CD-ROM Proc. 43th Conference on Decision and Control.
2. Bombois, X., M. Gevers, G. Scorletti and B.D.O. Anderson (2001). Robustness analysis tools for an uncertainty set obtained by prediction error identification. Automatica 37(10), 1629-1636.
3. Bombois, X., G. Scorletti, M. Gevers, R. Hildebrand and P. Van den Hof (2005). Least costly identification experiment for control. Submitted to Automatica.
4. Boyd, S., L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron and V. Balakrishnan (1994). Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory. Vol. 15 of Studies in Appl. Math., SIAM. Philadelphia.
5. Hildebrand, R. and M. Gevers (2003). Identification for control: optimal input design with respect to a worst-case v-gap cost function. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 41(5), 1586-1608.
6. 2 input design. In: Proc. MTNS.
7. Lindqvist, K. (2001). On experiment design in identification of smooth linear systems. Licentiate thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Ljung, L. (1999). System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Popov, V. M. (1973). Hyperstability of Control Systems. Springer-Verlag. New York.