Optimization of post-combustion CO2 process using DEA-MDEA mixtures

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1763-1773

  Rodríguez, Nestor ^a   Mussati, Sergio ^a,b   Scenna, Nicolas ^a,b  

^a UTN Facultad Regional Rosario ^*  (Argentina)

^b El INGAR Instituto de Desarollo y Diseno   (Argentina)

Author keywords

DEA; HYSYS process simulator; MDEA; Post combustion CO2 capture; Simulation and optimization

Indexed keywords

DEA; MDEA; POST-COMBUSTION; PROCESS SIMULATORS; SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION;

COMBUSTION; INLET FLOW; OPERATING COSTS; OPTIMIZATION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SIMULATORS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 79960705376     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 2 capture from power plants Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse gas control 2007, 1:37-46.
2. 2 capture from power plants Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse gas control 2007, 1:135-142.
3. Ali, C., 2004. Simulation and optimisation of a coal power plant with integrated CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing. Master Thesis. University of Waterloo.
4. 2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Convers. Manage. 2005, 46:475-487.
5. 2S using aqueous alkanolamine solutions world academy of science. Engineering and Technology 2009, 49:194-203.
6. 2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flow-sheet decomposition method. Energy Conversion and Management 2005, 46:475-487.
7. 2 absorbers with chemical reactions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1999, 38(5):2044-2050.
8. 2 capture unit single-and blended-amines into supercritical coal-fired power plant: implications for emissions and energy management. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00011-4.
9. 2 from flue gas streams by liquid membranes. Energy conversion and management volume. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Carbon Dioxide Removal 1995, 36(6-9):427-430.
10. 2 from flue gases: commercial trends. Canadian Society of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada 1999.
11. 2 with amines in a semi-closed GT cycle: plant performance and operating costs. ASME IGTI Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibition, Stockholm 1998.
12. Corti A., Failli L., Fiashi D., Manfrida G. Energy analysis of two second-generation SCGT plant proposals. ASME IGTI Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibition, Stockholm 1998.
13. Corti A., Failli L., Fiashi D., Manfrida G. Thermoeconomic evaluation of the SCGT cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 1999, 40:1917-1929.
14. Desideri U., Paolucci A. Performance modeling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants. Energy Conversion and Management 1999, 40:1899-1915. Engineering practice, how to estimate utility costs, 2006. Chemical Engineering: 66-69 (www.che.com, April 2006).
15. 2 Capture Costs 2005, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
16. Freguia, S., 2002. Modeling of CO2 removal from flue gases using MEA. M.S. Thesis.
17. 2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. AIChE Journal 2003, 49:1676-1686.
18. Henao C. Simulación y evaluación de procesos químicos 2005, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín.
19. 2 recovery/effective utilization/fixation and commercialization. MHI Technical Journal 2002, 39(5):286.
20. Idem R., Gelowitz D., Tontiwachwuthikul P. Evaluation of the performance of various amine based solvents in an optimized multipurpose technology development pilot plant. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:1543-1548.
21. Incropera F.P., De Witt D.P. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 1990, John Wiley and Sons. 3rd ed.
22. 2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 2006, 45(8):2465-2472.
23. Khakdaman H.R., Zoghi A.T., Abedinzadegan M., Ghadirian H.A. Revamping of gas refineries using amine blends. IUST International Journal of Engineering Science 2008, 19(3):27-32.
24. 2 capture. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 2009, 48:135-144.
25. 2 capture. International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics 1999, 2(4):165-175.
26. 2 removal by amine absorption from a gas based power plant. SIMS 2007 Conference, Gosteborg 2007.
27. 2 capture by aqueous amines. AIChE Journal 2007, 53(12):3144-3154.
28. 2 capture. Energy 2010, 35(2):851-857.
29. Rahimpour M.R., Kashkooli A.Z. Modeling and simulation of industrial carbon dioxide absorber using amine-promoted potash solution. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B 2004, 28(B6):653-666.
30. 2 capture systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research - Special Issue on Carbon Capture 2006, 45(8):2421-2429.
31. 2 capture plant using regenerable single and blended alkanolamines. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2005, 44:4465-4473.
32. 2 recycle combustion. Energy Conversion and Management 2003, 44:3073-3091.
33. Suppapitnarm A., Seffen K.A., Parks G.T., Clarkson P.J. A simulated annealing algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Engineering Optimization 2000, 33:59-85.
34. Turton R., Bailie, Whiting, Shaeiwitz Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes 1998, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
35. Vozniuk I.O., 2010. Aspen HYSYS process simulation and Aspen ICARUS cost estimation of CO2 removal plant. FMH606 Master's Thesis. http://teora.hit.no/dspace/bitstream/2282/975/1/Master%2520Thesis_Ievgeniia%2520Vozniuk.pdf.
36. Zhang P., Shi Y., Wei J., Zhao W., Ye Q. Regeneration of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol used for carbon dioxide absorption. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2008, 20:39-44.