Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 19, 2003, Pages 3073-3091

  Singh, D ^a   Croiset, E ^a   Douglas, P L ^a   Douglas, M A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aspen plus; CO2 capture; Economics; MEA; O2 CO2 recycle

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COMBUSTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; POWER PLANTS;

TECHNO-ECONOMIC COMPARISONS;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0038373217     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00040-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 2 separation from combustion gas streams by chemical reactive solvents. In: Proceedings of Combustion Canada '99, Calgary, Canada, 1999.
2. Desideri U., Paolucci A. Performance modelling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants. Energy Convers. Mgmt. 40:1999;1899-1915.
3. Hendriks C. Carbon dioxide removal from coal-fired power plants. 1994;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortecht, The Netherlands.
4. Herzog H, Pedersen OF. The Kvaerner membrane contactor: lessons from a case study in how to reduce capture costs. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-5), Cairns, Australia, 2000.
5. 2 capture on an existing US coal-fired power plant. In: First Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington DC, United States, 2001.
6. Riemer P. The capture of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel fired power stations. 1993;IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, England.
7. 2 control options analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-5), Cairns, Australia, 2000.
8. 2 mitigation economics for existing coal-fired power plants. In: First Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington DC, United States, 2001.
9. 2 recycle combustion vs. amine scrubbing. In: First Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington DC, United States, 2001.
10. 2 capture from a coal-fired power plant - a sensitivity analysis. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-6), Kyoto, Japan, 2002.
11. Croiset E, Thambimuthu KV. A Novel strategy for greenhouse gas abatement in coal fired power plants; enriched oxygen combustion. In: Proceedings of Combustion Canada '99, Calgary, Canada, 1999.
12. 2 combustion to an existing 300 MW coal fired power plant. In: Proceedings of Combustion Canada '99, Calgary, Canada, 1999.
13. 2 Capture from the flue gas of conventional flossil-fuel fired power plants. Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory Report, 1994.
14. 2 capture for pulverized coal fired power plants. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-5), Cairns, Australia, 2000.
15. Hysys (2000). Hysys Plant User Manual. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Hyprotech Limited.
16. Aspen Plus. (2000). Aspen Plus User Guide. Cambridge, MA, US: Aspen Technology Limited.
17. Mariz C.L. Carbon dioxide recovery: large scale design trends. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 37(7):1998;42-47.
18. Air Liquide Canada. Personal communication, 2000.
19. Icarus Process Evaluator. Icarus Process Evaluator User Manual. Cambridge, MA, US: Aspen Technology Limited; 2001.
20. Mimura T, Satsumi S, Iijima M, Mitsuoka S. Development on energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery by chemical absorption method and steam system in power plant. In: Proceedings of the Forth Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-4), Interlaken, Switzerland, 1999.
21. Mariz CL. Personal communication, 2001.
22. Gas Turbine World Handbook, 2000.
23. 2 capture processes - opportunities for imporoved energy efficienceies. Energy Convers. Mgmt. 38(S-1):1997;51-54.
24. CANMET Energy Technology Centre. Personal communication, 2001.