Foreign fieldworkers and native participants: A theory of method

Victims and Offenders

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 246-259

  Jacques, Scott ^a   Lindegaard, Marie Rosenkrantz ^b   van Gelder, Jean Louis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Foreign fieldwork; Pure sociology; Theory of method

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960669482     PISSN: 15564886     EISSN: 15564991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2011.581876     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barrett, C. B., & Cason, J. (2010). Overseas research II: A practical guide. New York: Routledge.
2. Baumgartner, M. P. (1988). The Moral Order of a Suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bennett, R. R. (2004). Comparative criminology and criminal justice research: The state of our knowledge. Justice Quarterly, 21, 1-21.
4. Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
5. Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.
6. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34-45.
7. Black, D. (1989). Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Black, D. (1995). The epistemology of pure sociology. Law and Social Inquiry, 20, 829-870.
9. Black, D. (1998). The social structure of right and wrong (Rev. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Black, D. (2000). Dreams of pure sociology. Sociological Theory, 18, 343-367.
11. Cooney, M. (1998). Warriors and peacemakers: How third parties shape violence. New York: New York University Press.
12. Cooney, M. (2006). The criminological potential of pure sociology. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 46, 51-63.
13. Cooney, M. (2009). Is killing wrong? A study in pure sociology. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
14. Cooney, M., & Phillips, S. (2002). Typologizing violence: A Blackian perspective. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 22(7/8), 75-108.
15. Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., & Harris, M. (Eds.). (1990). Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Horwitz, A. V. (1982). The social control of mental illness. New York: Academic Press.
17. Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2008). Intimacy with outlaws: The role of relational distance in recruiting, paying, and interviewing underworld research participants. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(1), 22-38.
18. Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2010a). Right or wrong? Toward a theory of IRBs' (dis)approval of research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 42-59.
19. Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2010b). Apprehending criminals: The impact of law on offender-based research. In W. Bernasco (Ed.), Offenders on offending: Learning about crime from criminals (pp. 23-45). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
20. Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2010c). Criminology as social control: Discriminatory research and its role in the reproduction of social inequalities. Crime, Law, & Social Change, 53(4), 383-396.
21. Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2010d). Dangerous intimacy: Toward a theory of violent victimization in active offender research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 503-525.
22. Kohn, M. L. (1987). Cross-national research as an analytic strategy. American Sociological Review, 52, 713-731.
23. Lindegaard, M. R. (2009). Coconuts, gangsters and rainbow fighters: How male youngsters navigate situations of violence in Cape Town, South Africa. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
24. Lindegaard, M. R. (2010). Method, actor and context triangulations: Knowing what happened during criminal events and the motivations for getting involved as offender. In W. Bernasco (Ed.), Offenders on offending: Learning about crime from criminals (pp. 109-140). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
25. Michalski, J. H. (2003). Financial altruism or unilateral resource exchanges? Toward a pure sociology of welfare. Sociological Theory, 21(4), 341-358.
26. Ostuni, F., & Van Gelder, J. L. (2008). "No sé si legal... ¡pero legítimo es!": Percepciones sobre seguridad en la tenencia y títulos de propiedad en barrios informales del Gran Buenos Aires. ["Not sure whether it is legal.... but it is legitimate! "Perceptions of tenure security and property rights in informal settlement in Greater Buenos Aires.] In M. C. Cravino (Ed.), Los mil barrios (in)formales: Aportes para la construcción de un observatorio del hábitat popular del Area Metropolitana de Buenos Aires [The thousand (in)formal settlements: Contributions for an observatory of low-income housing in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires] (pp. 140-162). Los Polvorines: UNGS.
27. Phillips, S., & Cooney, M. (2005). Aiding peace, abetting violence: Third parties and the management of conflict. American Sociological Review, 70, 334-354.
28. Popper, K. (1959/2002). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge Classics.
29. Tucker, J. (1999). The therapeutic corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Van Gelder, J. L. (2007). Feeling and thinking: Quantifying the relationship between perceived tenure security and housing improvement in an informal neighborhood in Buenos Aires. Habitat International, 31, 219-231.
31. Van Gelder, J. L. (2009). Legal tenure security, perceived tenure security and housing improvement in Buenos Aires: An attempt towards integration. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 126-146.
32. Van Gelder, J. L. (2010). Tales of deviance and control: On space, rules and law in squatter settlements. Law & Society Review, 44, 239-268.