Right or wrong? toward a theory of IRBs' (Dis) approval of research

Journal of Criminal Justice Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 42-59

  Jacques, Scott ^a   Wright, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75949110637     PISSN: 10511253     EISSN: 17459117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511250903496471     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abbott, A. 2004. Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W.W. Norton.
2. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2001. Protecting human beings: Institutional review boards and social science research. Academe 87: 55-67.
3. Annas, G. J., and M. A. Grodin (Eds.). 1995. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code: Human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Baer, L. J. 2005. Influences on IRB decision making. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27 (3): 7.
5. Bankert, E., and R. Amdur. 2005. Institutional review board: Management and function (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
6. Beckett, K., K. Nyrop, and L. Pfingst. 2006. Race, drugs and policing: Understanding disparities in drug delivery arrests. Criminology 44 (1): 105-138.
7. Black, D. 1976. The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.
8. Black, D. 1983. Crime as social control. American Sociological Review 48: 34-45.
9. Black, D. 1989. Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Black, D. 1995. The epistemology of pure sociology. Law and Social Inquiry 20: 829-870.
11. Black, D. 1998. The social structure of right and wrong (Rev. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Black, D. 2000. Dreams of pure sociology. Sociological Theory 18 (3): 343-367.
13. Bosk, C. L., and R. G. De Vries. 2004. Bureaucracies of mass deception: Institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 595: 249-263.
14. Candilis, P. J., C. W. Lidz, and R. M. Arnold. 2006. The need to understand IRB delibera-tions. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 28: 1-6.
15. Childress, J. F., E. M. Meslin, and H. T. Shapiro (Eds.). 2005. Belmont revisited: Ethical principles for research with human subjects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Citro, C. F., D. R. Ilgen, and C. B. Marrett. 2003. Protecting participants and facilitating social and behavioral science research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
17. Cooney, M. 1998. Warriors and peacemakers: How third parties shape violence. New York: New York University Press.
18. Cooney, M. 2006. The criminological potential of pure sociology. Crime, Law, and Social Change 46: 51-63.
19. Cooney, M., and S. Phillips. 2002. Typologizing violence: A Blackian perspective. Interna-tional Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 22 (7-8): 75-108.
20. Feeley, M. M. 2007. Legality, social research, and the challenge of institutional review boards. Law & Society Review 41: 757-776.
21. Hamburger, P. 2007. Getting permission. Northwestern University Law Review 101: 405-492.
22. Hornblum, A. M. 1999. Acres of skin: Human experiments at Holmesburg prison. New York: Routledge.
23. Humphreys, L. 1975. Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
24. Jacques, S. 2009. The necessary conditions for retaliation: Toward a theory of non-violent and violent forms in drug markets. Justice Quarterly. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/contentcontent=a910864139db= allorder=pubdate.
25. Jacques, S., and R. Wright. 2008a. Intimacy with outlaws: The role of relational distance in recruiting, paying, and interviewing underworld research participants. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 45: 22-38.
26. Jacques, S., and R. Wright. 2008b. The relevance of peace to studies of drug market violence. Criminology 46: 221-253.
27. Jacques, S., and R. Wright. 2008c. The victimization-termination link. Criminology 46: 1009-1038.
28. Jacques, S., and R. Wright. Forthcoming-a. Apprehending criminals: The impact of law on offender-based research. In Offenders on offending: How do we learn from criminals about criminal choices, ed. W. Bernasco. London: Willan.
29. Jacques, S., and R. Wright. Forthcoming-b. Dangerous intimacy: Toward a theory of violent victimization in active offender research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education.
30. Jones, J. H. 1993. Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
31. Kan, Y., and S. Phillips. 2003. Race and the death penalty: Including Asian Americans and exploring the desocialization of law. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 1: 1-25.
32. Katz, J. 2006. Ethical escape routes for underground ethnographers. American Ethnolo-gist 33 (4): 499-506.
33. Katz, J. 2007. Toward a natural history of ethical censorship. Law & Society Review 41: 797-810.
34. Kuhn, T. 1977. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. Lincoln, Y., and W. G. Tierney. 2004. Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry 10: 219-234.
36. Mazur, D. J. 2007. Evaluating the science and ethics of research on humans: A guide for IRB members. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
37. Michalski, J. H. 2003. Financial altruism or unilateral resource exchanges? Toward a pure sociology of welfare. Sociological Theory 21 (4): 341-358.
38. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
39. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (NCPHSBBR). 1979. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
40. Oakes, J. M. 2002. Risk and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review 26 (5): 443-479.
41. Penslar, R. L. 1993. Protecting human research subjects: Institutional review board guidebook. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
42. Pettit, B., and B. Western. 2004. Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review 69: 151-169.
43. Phillips, S. 2003. The social structure of vengeance: A test of Black's model. Criminology 41 (3): 673-708.
44. Phillips, S. 2008. Racial disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Houston Law Review 45: 807-840.
45. Phillips, S. 2009. Legal disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Journal of Crimi-nal Law and Criminology 99: 717-756.
46. Phillips, S., and M. Cooney. 2005. Aiding peace, abetting violence: Third parties and the management of conflict. American Sociological Review 70: 334-354.
47. Popper, K. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge Classics.
48. Taylor, H. 2007. Moving beyond compliance: Measuring ethical quality to enhance the oversight of human subjects research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (5): 9-14.
49. Wright, R., S., Decker, A., Redfern, and D. Smith. 1992. A snowball's chance in hell: Doing fieldwork with active residential burglars. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 29: 148-161.
50. Zimbardo, P. G. 1999. Stanford prison experiment: A simulation study of the psychology imprisonment conducted at Stanford University. Retrieved from http://www.prisonexp.org/
51. Zywicki, T. J. 2007. Institutional review boards as academic bureaucracies: An economic and experiential analysis. Northwestern University Law Review 101: 861-896.