Comparing the ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fibre layer measurements by Fourier domain OCT to detect glaucoma in high myopia

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 95, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1115-1121

  Na, Rae Kim ^a   Eun, Suk Lee ^a   Gong, Je Seong ^a   Sung, Yong Kang ^b   Ji, Hyun Kim ^a   Samin, Hong ^a   Chan, Yun Kim ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOURIER DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA; HIGH MYOPIA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERFEROMETRY; MACULAR GANGLION CELL COMPLEX THICKNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; NERVE FIBERS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960638234     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.182493     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Huang ML, Chen HY. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4121-9.
2. Parikh RS, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, et al. Diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT 3) in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2238-43. (Pubitemid 350181104)
3. Garway-Heath DF, Caprioli J, Fitzke FW, et al. Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1774-82. (Pubitemid 30354349)
4. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, et al. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2242-50. (Pubitemid 29418378)
5. Zeimer R, Asrani S, Zou S, et al. Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:224-31. (Pubitemid 28090824)
6. Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, et al. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2012-17.
7. Tan O, Li G, Lu AT, et al. Mapping of macular substructures with optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis. Ophthalmology 2008;115:949-56. (Pubitemid 351749686)
8. Van Buren JM. The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer: A Physiological-Anatomical Correlation in Man and Primates of the Normal Topographical Anatomy of the Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer and its Alterations with Lesions of the Visual Pathways. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1963.
9. Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances: clinical correlations. Ophthalmology 1996;103:640-9. (Pubitemid 26114236)
10. Greve EL, Furuno F. Myopia and glaucoma. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1980;213:33-41. (Pubitemid 10133694)
11. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43. (Pubitemid 13033817)
12. Hoh ST, Lim MC, Seah SK, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness variations with myopia. Ophthalmology 2006;113:773-7. (Pubitemid 44294302)
13. Salchow DJ, Oleynikov YS, Chiang MF, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal children measured with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:786-91.
14. Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Varma R, et al. Determinants of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Stratus OCT. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1046-52. (Pubitemid 46829361)
15. Kashiwagi K, Tamura M, Abe K, et al. The influence of age, gender, refractive error, and optic disc size on the optic disc configuration in Japanese normal eyes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:200-3. (Pubitemid 30201431)
16. Leung CK, Mohamed S, Leung KS, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in myopia: an optical coherence tomography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5171-6. (Pubitemid 46723761)
17. Leung MM, Huang RY, Lam AK. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal Hong Kong Chinese children measured with optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2010;19:95-9.
18. Rauscher FM, Sekhon N, Feuer WJ, et al. Myopia affects retinal nerve fiber layer measurements as determined by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2009;18:501-5.
19. Vernon SA, Rotchford AP, Negi A, et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in highly myopic Caucasians as measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1076-80.
20. Sinai MJ, Garway-Heath DF, Fingeret M, et al. The role of ethnicity on the retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc area measured with Fourier domain optical coherence tomography [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50(Suppl):P4785.
21. Seong M, Sung KR, Choi EH, et al. Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal-tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:1446-52.
22. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2305-14 e1-2.