Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow

NeuroImage

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-33

  Zheng, Xin ^a   Alsop, David C ^a   Schlaug, Gottfried ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MOTOR CORTEX; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPIN LABELING; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN CHEMISTRY; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; SAFETY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960623925     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aguirre G.K., Detre J.A., et al. Experimental design and the relative sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion fMRI. Neuroimage 2002, 15(3):488-500.
2. Alsop D.C., Detre J.A. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998, 208(2):410-416.
3. Angelone L.M., Vasios C.E., et al. On the effect of resistive EEG electrodes and leads during 7T MRI: simulation and temperature measurement studies. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 24(6):801-812.
4. Antal A., Nitsche M.A., et al. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16(4):521-527.
5. Antal A., Polania R., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI. Neuroimage 2011, 55(2):590-596.
6. Baudewig J., Siebner H.R., et al. Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroreport 2001, 12(16):3543-3548.
7. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., et al. On the synchronization of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional echo-planar imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003, 17(3):309-316.
8. Bestmann S., Baudewig J., et al. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19(7):1950-1962.
9. Bindman L.J., Lippold O.C., et al. Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced bypolarizing currents. Nature 1962, 196:584-585.
10. Bindman L.J., Lippold O.C., et al. The Action of Brief Polarizing Currents on the Cerebral Cortex of the Rat (1) during Current Flow and (2) in the Production of Long-Lasting after-Effects. J. Physiol. 1964, 172:369-382.
11. Brandt S.A., Brocke J., et al. In vivo assessment of human visual system connectivity with transcranial electrical stimulation during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2001, 14(2):366-375.
12. Chi R.P., Fregni F., et al. Visual memory improved by non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Res. 2010, 1353:168-175.
13. Chouinard P.A., Van Der Werf Y.D., et al. Modulating neural networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90(2):1071-1083.
14. Dai W., Garcia D., et al. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 60(6):1488-1497.
15. Detre J.A., Leigh J.S., et al. Perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992, 23(1):37-45.
16. Durand S., Fromy B., et al. Vasodilatation in response to repeated anodal current application in the human skin relies on aspirin-sensitive mechanisms. J. Physiol. 2002, 540(Pt 1):261-269.
17. Elmer S., Burkard M., et al. Direct current induced short-term modulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while learning auditory presented nouns. Behav. Brain Funct. 2009, 5:29.
18. Fox P., Ingham R., et al. Imaging human intra-cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS. Neuroreport 1997, 8(12):2787-2791.
19. Fox P.T., Narayana S., et al. Intensity modulation of TMS-induced cortical excitation: primary motor cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27(6):478-487.
20. Fricke K., Seeber A.A., et al. Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105(3):1141-1149.
21. Friston K.J., Rotshtein P., et al. A critique of functional localisers. Neuroimage 2006, 30(4):1077-1087.
22. Galea J.M., Celnik P. Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102(1):294-301.
23. Hattori Y., Moriwaki A., et al. Biphasic effects of polarizing current on adenosine-sensitive generation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 1990, 116(3):320-324.
24. Islam N., Aftabuddin M., et al. Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain. Brain Res. 1995, 684(2):206-208.
25. Kincses T.Z., Antal A., et al. Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(1):113-117.
26. Koos T., Tepper J.M. Inhibitory control of neostriatal projection neurons by GABAergic interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2(5):467-472.
27. Kwon Y.H., Ko M.H., et al. Primary motor cortex activation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human brain. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 435(1):56-59.
28. Lang N., Siebner H.R., et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain?. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 22(2):495-504.
29. Liebetanz D., Nitsche M.A., et al. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002, 125(Pt 10):2238-2247.
30. Mathys C., Loui P., et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation applied to Heschl's gyrus modulates pitch discrimination. Front. Psychol. 2010, 1.
31. Megias M., Emri Z., et al. Total number and distribution of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Neuroscience 2001, 102(3):527-540.
32. Moisa M., Pohmann R., et al. Interleaved TMS/CASL: Comparison of different rTMS protocols. Neuroimage 2009, 49(1):612-620.
33. Moriwaki A. Polarizing currents increase noradrenaline-elicited accumulation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res. 1991, 544(2):248-252.
34. Nitsche M.A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a new treatment for depression?. Bipolar Disord. 2002, 4(Suppl. 1):98-99.
35. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 2000, 527(Pt 3):633-639.
36. Nitsche M.A., Liebetanz D., et al. Modulation of cortical excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation. Nervenarzt 2002, 73(4):332-335.
37. Nitsche M.A., Fricke K., et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J. Physiol. 2003, 553(Pt 1):293-301.
38. Nitsche M.A., Nitsche M.S., et al. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114(4):600-604.
39. Nitsche M.A., Schauenburg A., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15(4):619-626.
40. Okamoto M., Dan H., et al. Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10-20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. Neuroimage 2004, 21(1):99-111.
41. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
42. Paus T., Jech R., et al. Dose-dependent reduction of cerebral blood flow during rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human sensorimotor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 79(2):1102-1107.
43. Priori A., Berardelli A., et al. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport 1998, 9(10):2257-2260.
44. Purpura D.P., McMurtry J.G. Intracellular Activities and Evoked Potential Changes during Polarization of Motor Cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1965, 28:166-185.
45. Ragert P., Vandermeeren Y., et al. Improvement of spatial tactile acuity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119(4):805-811.
46. Reis J., Schambra H.M., et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106(5):1590-1595.
47. Rogalewski A., Breitenstein C., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20(1):313-316.
48. Schlaug G., Renga V. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2008, 5(6):759-768.
49. Sparing R., Dafotakis M., et al. Enhancing language performance with non-invasive brain stimulation-a transcranial direct current stimulation study in healthy humans. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(1):261-268.
50. Stagg C.J., Best J.G., et al. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(16):5202-5206.
51. Vines B.W., Nair D.G., et al. Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport 2006, 17(6):671-674.
52. Vines B.W., Schnider N.M., et al. Testing for causality with transcranial direct current stimulation: pitch memory and the left supramarginal gyrus. Neuroreport 2006, 17(10):1047-1050.
53. Vines B.W., Cerruti C., et al. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2008, 9:103.
54. Vines B.W., Nair D., et al. Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(8):1667-1673.
55. Williams D.S., Detre J.A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water [published erratum appears in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992 May 1;89(9):4220]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89(1):212-216.