Colonization and extinction dynamics of an annual plant metapopulation in an urban environment

Oikos

Volumn 120, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1240-1246

  Dornier, Antoine ^a,b   Pons, Virginie ^a   Cheptou, Pierre Olivier ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL PLANT; COLONIZATION; DATA SET; DISPERSAL; EXTINCTION; FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT TYPE; METAPOPULATION; PATCHINESS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; SEED; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; URBAN AREA; VASCULAR PLANT;

ASTERACEAE; CREPIS; CREPIS SANCTA;

EID: 79960620036     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18959.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bullock J. M. et al. 2006. Measuring plant dispersal: an introduction to field methods and experimental design. Plant Ecol. 186: 217-234.
2. Burnham K. and Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. - Springer.
3. Cheptou P. O. and Avendano L. G. 2006. Pollination processes and the Allee effect in highly fragmented populations: consequences for the mating system in urban environments. New Phytol. 172: 774-783.
4. Cheptou P. O. et al. 2008. Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 3796-3799.
5. Clark C. J. et al. 2007. Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am. Nat. 170: 128-142.
6. Dostal P. 2005. Is the population turnover of patchy-distributed annuals determined by dormancy dynamics or dispersal processes? Ecography 28: 745-756.
7. Ehrlén J. and Eriksson O. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81: 1667-1674.
8. Ehrlén J. and Eriksson O. 2003. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: a response to Freckleton & Watkinson. J. Ecol. 91: 316-320.
9. Eriksson O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258.
10. Etienne R. et al. 2004. Applications of stochastic patch occupancy models to real metapopulations. - In: Hanski I. and Gaggiotti O. (eds), Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulation. Academic Press, pp. 105-132.
11. Freckleton R. P. and Watkinson A. R. 2002. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. J. Ecol. 90: 419-434.
12. Gotelli N. J. 1991. Metapopulation models - the rescue effect, the propagule rain, and the core-satellite hypothesis. Am. Nat. 138: 768-776.
13. Hanski I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution - the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210-221.
14. Hanski I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151-162.
15. Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
16. Hanski I. and Ovaskainen O. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404: 755-758.
17. Hanski I. and Gaggiotti O. 2004. Metapopulation biology: past, present and future - In: Hanski I. and Gaggiotti O. (eds), Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulation. Academic Press, pp. 3-22.
18. Harrison S. and Taylor A. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. - In: Hanski I. and Gilpin M. E. (eds), Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 27-42.
19. Husband B. C. and Barrett S. C. H. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J. Ecol. 84: 461-469.
20. Imbert E. 1999. The effects of achene dimorphism on the dispersal in time and space in Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Can. J. Bot. 77: 508-513.
21. Kalamees R. and Zobel M. 2002. The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology 83: 1017-1025.
22. Keeling M. J. 2002. Using individual-based simulations to test the Levins metapopulation paradigm. J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 270-279.
23. Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environment heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240.
24. Moilanen A. 1999. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology 80: 1031-1043.
25. Moilanen A. 2004. SPOMSIM: software for stochastic patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics. Ecol. Model. 179: 533-550.
26. Moilanen A. and Nieminen M. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83: 1131-1145.
27. Moilanen A. et al. 1998. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. Am. Nat. 152: 530-542.
28. Munoz F. et al. 2007. Spectral analysis of simulated species distribution maps provides insights into metapopulation dynamics. Ecol. Model. 205: 314-322.
29. Ouborg N. and Eriksson O. 2004. Toward a metapopulation concept for plants. - In: Hanski I. and Gaggiotti O. (eds), Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulation. Academic Press, pp. 447-469.
30. Ovaskainen O. and Hanski I. 2004a. Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. - In: Hanski I. and Gaggiotti O. (eds), Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulation. Academic Press, pp. 73-103.
31. Ovaskainen O. and Hanski I. 2004b. From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. Am. Nat. 164: 364-377.
32. Ozgul A. et al. 2006. Effects of patch quality and network structure on patch occupancy dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 191-202.
33. Ozgul A. et al. 2009. Influence of local demography on asymptotic and transient dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot metapopulation. Am. Nat. 173: 517-530.
34. Pannell J. R. and Dorken M. E. 2006. Colonization as a common denominator in plant metapopulations and range expansions: effects on genetic diversity and sexual systems. Landscape Ecol. 21: 837-848.
35. Riba M. et al. 2009. Darwin's wind hypothesis: does it work for plant dispersal in fragmented habitats? New Phytol. 183: 667-677.
36. Schurr F. M. et al. 2007. Colonization and persistence ability explain the extent to which plant species fill their potential range. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 449-459.
37. Snäll T. et al. 2005. Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape. Ecology 86: 106-115.
38. Valverde T. and Silvertown J. 1997. A metapopulation model for Primula vulgaris, a temperate forest understorey herb. J. Ecol. 85: 193-210.
39. Verheyen K. et al. 2004. Metapopulation dynamics in changing landscapes: a new spatially realistic model for forest plants. Ecology 85: 3302-3312.