Comparison of enhancement characteristics between invasive lobular carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 293-300

  Mann, Ritse M ^a   Veltman, Jeroen ^a   Huisman, Henkjan ^a   Boetes, Carla ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

breast cancer; Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Invasive lobular carcinoma; pharmacokinetic modeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 79960615590     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22632     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE,. Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA 2003; 289: 1421-1424. (Pubitemid 37430310)
2. Bane AL, Tjan S, Parkes RK, Andrulis I, O'Malley FP,. Invasive lobular carcinoma: to grade or not to grade. Mod Pathol 2005; 18: 621-628. (Pubitemid 40676372)
3. Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Menon S, Green AR, Lee AH, Ellis IO,. Histologic grading is an independent prognostic factor in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 111: 121-127. (Pubitemid 352009237)
4. Schnitt SJ, Guidi AJ,. Pathology of invasive breast cancer. In:, Harris JR, Morrow M, Osborne CK, Lippman ME, editors. Diseases of the breast. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p 541-584.
5. Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linnell FS,. Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 1991; 178: 149-154.
6. Krecke KN, Gisvold JJ,. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 957-960. (Pubitemid 23333151)
7. Veltman J, Boetes C, van Die L, Bult P, Blickman JG, Barentsz JO,. Mammographic detection and staging of invasive lobular carcinoma. Clin Imaging 2006; 30: 94-98. (Pubitemid 43267623)
8. Skaane P, Skjorten F,. Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1999; 40: 369-375. (Pubitemid 129567240)
9. Watermann DO, Tempfer C, Hefler LA, Parat C, Stickeler E,. Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 167-174. (Pubitemid 40228770)
10. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849.
11. Banks E, Reeves G, Beral V, et al. Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study. BMJ 2004; 329: 477.
12. Le Gal M, Ollivier L, Asselain B, et al. Mammographic features of 455 invasive lobular carcinomas. Radiology 1992; 185: 705-708.
13. Selinko VL, Middleton LP, Dempsey PJ,. Role of sonography in diagnosing and staging invasive lobular carcinoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2004; 32: 323-332. (Pubitemid 39063062)
14. Caramella T, Chapellier C, Ettore F, Raoust I, Chamorey E, Balu-Maestro C,. Value of MRI in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases: comparison with physical examination, conventional imaging, and histology. Clin Imaging 2007; 31: 155-161. (Pubitemid 46601797)
15. Francis A, England DW, Rowlands DC, Wadley M, Walker C, Bradley SA,. The diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. Does MRI have a role? Breast 2001; 10: 38-40. (Pubitemid 32124131)
16. Kepple J, Layeeque R, Klimberg VS, et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic size of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 623-627. (Pubitemid 41306091)
17. Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW, Smith A, Drew PJ,. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29: 32-37. (Pubitemid 36181775)
18. Mann RM, Veltman J, Barentsz JO, Wobbes T, Blickman JG, Boetes C,. The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34: 135-142.
19. Munot K, Dall B, Achuthan R, Parkin G, Lane S, Horgan K,. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1296-1301. (Pubitemid 36002550)
20. Rodenko GN, Harms SE, Pruneda JM, et al. MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 1415-1419. (Pubitemid 26418723)
21. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, Boetes C,. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 107: 1-14. (Pubitemid 350179588)
22. Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH,. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008; 246: 116-124. (Pubitemid 350305034)
23. Sittek H, Perlet C, Untch M, Kessler M, Reiser M,. [Dynamic MR-mammography in invasive lobular breast cancer]. Rontgenpraxis 1998; 51: 235-242. (Pubitemid 28462007)
24. Trecate G, Tess JD, Vergnaghi D, et al. Lobular breast cancer: how useful is breast magnetic resonance imaging? Tumori 2001; 87: 232-238. (Pubitemid 32928842)
25. Fabre Demard N, Boulet P, Prat X, Charra L, Lesnik A, Taourel P,. [Breast MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma: diagnosis and staging]. J Radiol 2005; 86 (Pt 1): 1027-1034. (Pubitemid 41232754)
26. Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1209-1216. (Pubitemid 38979214)
27. Morris EA,. Breast MR imaging lexicon updated. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 293-303, v. (Pubitemid 46053825)
28. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238: 42-53. (Pubitemid 43010579)
29. Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk M, Mann R, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1123-1133.
30. Huisman HJ, Karssemeijer N,. Processing and displaying dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging information. [US Patent application: 20080125643] May 28, 2008.
31. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 223-232. (Pubitemid 29463104)
32. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211: 101-110. (Pubitemid 29161739)
33. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 399-406. (Pubitemid 32105648)
34. Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1227-1232. (Pubitemid 34411425)
35. Yeh ED, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Talele A, Monticciolo D, Kopans DB,. Invasive lobular carcinoma: spectrum of enhancement and morphology on magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 2003; 9: 13-18. (Pubitemid 36176458)
36. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 260-266. (Pubitemid 29463108)
37. Eliat PA, Dedieu V, Bertino C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast-enhanced relaxometry of breast tumors: an MRI multicenter investigation concerning 100 patients. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 475-481. (Pubitemid 38534662)
38. Vincensini D, Dedieu V, Eliat PA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability and extracellular volume fraction of breast tumors by dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced relaxometry. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 293-302. (Pubitemid 46420753)
39. Lee AH, Dublin EA, Bobrow LG, Poulsom R,. Invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast show distinct patterns of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis. J Pathol 1998; 185: 394-401. (Pubitemid 28355972)
40. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A,. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 431-438. (Pubitemid 27212423)
41. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne HE, Kvinnsland S, Haugen OA, Rinck PA,. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4: 477-480.
42. El Khouli RH, Macura KJ, Jacobs MA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: W295-W300.
43. Mann RM, Huisman HJ, Veltman J, Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C,. Morphologic and dynamic differences between invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2008; 16: 3769.
44. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 889-895. (Pubitemid 32479947)
45. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Futterer JJ, Boetes C, van Die LE, Jager G, Barentsz JO,. Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 355-362. (Pubitemid 40734564)