Categorization-based spatial voting

Quarterly Journal of Political Science

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 357-370

  Collins, Nathan A ^a  

^a SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960573494     PISSN: 15540626     EISSN: 15540634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1561/100.00010062     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, J. R. 1991. "The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization." Psychological Review 98: 409-429.
2. Anderson, S. and P.Habel. 2009. "Revisiting Adjusted ADA Scores for theU.S. Congress, 1947-2007." Political Analysis 17: 83-88.
3. Brady, H. E. and S. Ansolabehere. 1989. "The Nature of Utility Functions inMass Publics." American Political Science Review 83: 143-163.
4. Claassen, R. L. 2009. "Direction Versus Proximity: Amassing Experimental Evidence." American Politics Research 37(2): 227-253.
5. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
6. Estes, W. K. 1994. Classification and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Fryer, R.G. and M.O. Jackson. 2008. "ACategoricalModel of Cognition and BiasedDecision-Making." The Berkeley Electronic Press Journal of Theoretical Economics (Contributions)8.
8. Grofman, B. 1985. "The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting." The Journal of Politics 47: 230-237.
9. Hong, L. and S. E. Page. 2001. "Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents." Journal of Economic Theory 97: 123-163. (Pubitemid 33653352)
10. Lewis, J. B. and G. King. 1999. "No Evidence on Directional vs. Proximity Voting." Political Analysis 8: 21-33.
11. Love, B. C., D. L. Medin and T. M. Gureckis. 2004. "SUSTAIN: A Network Model of Category Learning." Psychological Review 111: 309-332. (Pubitemid 38516420)
12. Macdonald, S. E.,G. Rabinowitz and O. Listhaug. 1998. "On Attempting to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model: Sometimes the Patient Just Can't Be Helped." The Journal of Politics 60: 653-690.
13. Macdonald, S. E., G. Rabinowitz and O. Listhaug. 2001. "Sophistry Versus Science: On Further Efforts to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model." The Journal of Politics 63: 482-500.
14. Matthews,S.A. 1979. "A SimpleDirection Model of Electoral Competition."Public Choice 34: 141-156.
15. Merrill, S. and B. Grofman. 1997. "Directional and Proximity Models of Voter Utility and Choice: A New Synthesis and an Illustrative Test of Competing Models." Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 25-48.
16. Merrill, S. and B. Grofman. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting. Cambridge University Press.
17. Mullainathan, S. 2002. "Thinking Through Categories." mimeo.
18. Mullainathan, S., J. Schwartzstein and A. Shleifer. 2008. "Coarse Thinking and Persuasion." Quarterly Journal of Political Science 123(2): 577-619.
19. Nosofsky, R. M., M. A. Gluck, T. J. Palmieri, S. C. McKinley and P. Glau-thier. 1994. "Comparing Models of Rule-based Classification: A Replication of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961)." Memory and Cognition 22: 352-369. (Pubitemid 24121984)
20. Rabinowitz,G. and S. E.MacDonald. 1989. "A Directional Theory of Issue Voting." American Political Science Review 83: 93-121.
21. Rosch, E. 1978. "Principles of Categorization." In Cognition and Categorization, eds. Rosch, E. and B. B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
22. Shepard, R. N. 1987. "Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science." Science 237: 1317-1323. (Pubitemid 17134615)
23. Smith, E. E. 1990. "Categorization." In An Invitation to Cognitive Science, eds. Daniel N. O. and E. E. Smith. MIT Press.
24. Tomz, M. and R. P.VanHouweling. 2008. "Candidate Positioning and Voter Choice."American Political Science Review 102(3): 303-318.
25. Westholm, A. 1997. "Distance Versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice." American Political Science Review 91: 865-883. (Pubitemid 127173827)
26. Westholm, A. 2001. "On the Return of Epicycles: Some Crossroads in Spatial Modeling Revisited." The Journal of Politics 63: 436-481.