Evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: Protocol for an interrupted time series design

Implementation Science

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Kastner, Monika ^a,b   Sawka, Anna ^a   Thorpe, Kevin ^a,b   Chignel, Mark ^a   Marquez, Christine ^b   Newton, David ^b   Straus, Sharon E ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CANADA; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE;

EID: 79960564844     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-77     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1997, 7:407-13.
2. International Osteoporosis Foundation. Accessed in April 2011., http://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-and-statistics.html
3. Goeree R, Blackhouse G, Adachi J. Cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments for women with osteoporosis in Canada. Curr Med Res Opin 2006, 22(7):1425-1436. 10.1185/030079906X115568, 16834841.
4. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Min Res 2007, 22(3):465-75.
5. Osteoporosis Canada. Accessed April 2011., http://www.osteoporosis.ca/index.php/ci_id/8867/la_id/1.htm
6. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. NIH consensus statements. 2000, 17(1):1-45. Accessed April 2011., http://consensus.nih.gov/2000/2000Osteoporosis111html.htm
7. Reginster J, Burlet N. Osteoporosis: A still increasing prevalence. Bone 2006, 38:S4-S9.
8. Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman W, et al. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ 2009, 181(5):265-271. 10.1503/cmaj.081720, 2734204, 19654194.
9. Lips P, van Schoor NM. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 2005, 16:447-455.
10. Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002, 359:1761-7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9, 12049882.
11. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Pickard L, et al. The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporosis Int 2003, 14:895-904.
12. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung A, et al. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 2010, 182(17):1864-73. 10.1503/cmaj.100771, 20940232.
13. Osteoporosis, Clinical Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment: Update on pharmacological interventions and algorithm for management. Royal College of Physicians, Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain 2003, Accessed in April, 2011., http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk
14. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins: ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 50, January 2004. Osteoporosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 103(1):203-16.
15. Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, et al. The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture. Osteoporosis Int 2008, 19:79-86.
16. Jaglal SB, McIsaac WJ, Hawker G, Carroll J, Jaakkimainen L, et al. Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration of the failure of the current guideline implementation process. Osteoporosis Int 2003, 14:672-6.
17. Cheng N, Green ME. Osteoporosis screening for men: Are family physicians following guidelines?. Can Fam Phys 2008, 54:1140-1. e1-5.
18. Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Kvern B, Boulos P, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD. The osteoporosis care gap in Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004, 6:5-11.
19. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, et al. The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporosis Int 2008, 19:581-587.
20. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, Spurr C, Khorasani R, Tanasijevic M, Middleton B. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. JAMIA 2003, 10(6):523-530. 264429, 12925543.
21. Purcell GP. What makes a good clinical decision support system: We have some answers, but implementing good decision support is still hard. BMJ 2005, 330:741-2. 10.1136/bmj.330.7494.741, 555865, 15802701.
22. Sullivan F, Wyatt JC. How decision support tools help define clinical problems. BMJ 2005, 331:831-833. 10.1136/bmj.331.7520.831, 1246087, 16210284.
23. Kastner M, Straus SE. Clinical decision support tools for osteoporosis disease management: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. JGIM 2008, 23(12):2095-2105. 10.1007/s11606-008-0812-9, 2596508, 18836782.
24. Kastner M, Li J, Lottridge D, Marquez C, Newton D, Straus SE. Development of a prototype clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: A qualitative study of focus groups. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak 2010, 10:40.
25. Kastner M, Lottridge D, Marquez C, Newton D, Straus SE. Usability evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management. Implementation Science 2010, 5:96. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-96, 3016442, 21143978.
26. Hamilton Family Health Team. Accessed April, 2011., http://www.hamiltonfht.ca/
27. Ramsey CR, Matowe L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: Lessons from two systematic reviews of behaviour change strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003, 19(4):613-23.
28. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. 2002, Houghton Mifflin Company.
29. McDowall D, McCleary R, Meidinger EE, Hay RA. Interrupted Time Series Analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. 1980, Sage University Press.
30. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. BARRIERS: The barriers to research utilization scale. Applied Nursing Research 1991, 4(1):39-45. 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80052-7, 1741634.
31. Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 1998, California: Sage Publications Inc.
32. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 2002, 3. California: Sage Publications Inc.
33. Eccles M, Steen N, et al. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002, 325:1-7. 10.1136/bmj.325.7354.1, 1123541, 12098707.
34. Graham TAD, Kushniruk AW, Bullard MJ, et al. How usability of a web-based clinical decision support system has the potential to contribute to adverse medical events. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2008, 257-61.
35. Kushniruk AW, Triola MM, Borycki EM, et al. Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using handheld application. Int J Med Inform 2005, 74(7-8):519-26. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.003, 16043081.
36. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. JAMIA 2004, 11:104-112. 353015, 14633936.
37. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract 2001, 4:256-62.
38. Ciaschini P, Straus S, Dolovich L, Goeree R, Leung K, Woods C, Zimmerman G, Majumdar S, Spadafora S, Fera L, Lee H. Community-based randomized controlled trial evaluating falls and osteoporosis risk management strategies. Trials 2008, 9(1):62. 10.1186/1745-6215-9-62, 2612651, 18983670.
39. Public Health Agency of Canada. Canada's Aging Population: Who are Canada's Seniors?. Division of Aging and Seniors, Health Canada 2002, Accessed on October 3, 2009., http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/publications/public/various-varies/papier-fed-paper/fedreport1-eng.php
40. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002, 288(19):2469-2475. 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469, 12435261.
41. Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, et al. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med 2005, 11(Suppl1):S7-15.
42. Holman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. BMJ 2000, 320:526-527. 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.526, 1117581, 10688539.
43. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002, 288:1775-1779. 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775, 12365965.
44. Biglan A, Ary D, Wagenaar AC. The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science 2000, 1(1):31-49. 10.1023/A:1010024016308, 11507793.