Experimental verification of brain tissue incompressibility using digital image correlation

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1177-1185

  Libertiaux, V ^a   Pascon, F ^a   Cescotto, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Brain tissue; Compression tests; Cyclic tests; Digital image correlation; Incompressibility; Relaxation tests

Indexed keywords

BRAIN TISSUE; COMPRESSION TESTS; CYCLIC TESTS; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION; INCOMPRESSIBILITY; RELAXATION TESTS;

BIOLOGY; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; COMPRESSION TESTING; CYCLIC LOADS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STRAIN MEASUREMENT; TESTING;

TISSUE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN TISSUE; COMPRESSION; DIGITAL IMAGING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROSURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; CATTLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; OPTICAL PROCESSES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79960556758     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aimedieu, P., Grebe, R., Idy-Peretti, I., 2001. Study of brain white matter anisotropy. In: 23rd Annual EMBS International Conference.
2. Besnard G., Hild F., Roux S. Finite-element displacement fields analysis from digital images: application to Portevin-Le Chatelier bands. Experimental Mechanics 2006, 46:789-803.
3. Brands D., Peters G., Bovendeed P. Design and numerical implementation of a 3D non-linear viscoelastic constitutive model for brain tissue during impact. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37:127-134.
4. Brunon A., Bruyere-Garnier K., Coret M. Mechanical characterization of liver capsule through uniaxial quasi-static tensile tests until failure. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:2221-2227.
5. Chu T., Ranson W., Sutton M., Peters W. Applications of digital image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Experimental Mechanics 1985, 25:232-244.
6. Cyganek B., Siebert J. An Introduction to 3D Computer Vision Techniques and Algorithms 2009, Wiley.
7. Darvish K., Crandall J. Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. Medical Engineering and Physics 2001, 23:633-645.
8. Franceschini, G., 2006. The mechanics of human brain tissue. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Trento.
9. Gao Z., Desai J. Estimating zero-strain states of very soft tissue under gravity loading using digital image correlation. Medical Image Analysis 2010, 14:126-137.
10. Garo A., Hrapko M., van Dommelen J., Peters G. Towards a reliable characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: the effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation. Biorheology 2007, 44:51-58.
11. Horaud, R., Monga, O., 1995. Vision par ordinateur. Herms-Lavoisier (Ed.).
12. Jacquemoud C., Bruyere-Garnier K., Coret M. Methodology to determine failure characteristics of planar soft tissues using a dynamic tensile test. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:468-475.
13. Jin T., Goo N., Woo S., Park H. Use of a digital image correlation technique for measuring the material properties of Beetle wing. Journal of Bionic Engineering 2009, 6:224-231.
14. Kyriacou S., Mohamed A., Miller K., Neff S. Brain mechanics for neurosurgery: modeling issues. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2002, 1:151-164.
15. Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson's ratio. Science 1987, 235:1038.
16. Lauret C., Hrapko M., van Dommelen J., Peters G., Wismans J. Optical characterization of acceleration-induced strain fields in inhomogeneous brain slices. Medical Engineering and Physics 2008.
17. Miga M., Paulsen K., Hoopes P., Kennedy F., Hartov A., Roberts D. In vivo modelling of interstitial pressure in the brain under surgical load using finite elements. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2000, 122:354-363.
18. Miller K., Chinzei K. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. Journal of Biomechanics 1997, 30:1115-1121.
19. Miller K. Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. Journal of Biomechanics 1999, 32:531-537.
20. Miller K., Chinzei K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. Journal of Biomechanics 2002, 35:483-490.
21. Prange M., Margulies S. Regional, directional and age-dependent properties of brain undergoing large deformation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2002, 124:244-253.
22. Rethore J., Besnard G., Vivier G., Hild F., Roux S. Experimental investigation of localized phenomena using digital image correlation. Philosophical Magazine 2008, 88:3339-3355.
23. Sanghavi P., Bose D., Kerrigan J., Madeley N., Crandall J. Non-contact strain measurement of biological tissue. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 2004, 40:51-56.
24. Scharstein D. View Synthesis Using Stereo Vision 1999, Springer.
25. Sztefek P., Vanleene M., Olsson R., Collinson R., Pitsillides A., Shefelbine S. Using digital image correlation to determine bone surface strains during loading and after adaptation of the mouse tibia. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:599-605.
26. Thompson M., Schell H., Lienau J., Duda G. Digital image correlation: a technique for determining local mechanical conditions within early bone callus. Medical Engineering and Physics 2007, 29:820-823.
27. Velardi F., Fraternali F., Angelillo M. Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2006, 5:53-61.
28. Wittek A., Hawkins T., Miller K. On the unimportance of constitutive models in computing brain deformation for image-guided surgery. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009, 8:77-84.
29. Zhang D., Arola D. Applications of digital image correlation to biological tissues. Journal of Biomedical Optics 2004, 9:691-699.