Using digital image correlation to determine bone surface strains during loading and after adaptation of the mouse tibia

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 599-605

  Sztefek, Pavel ^a   Vanleene, Maximilien ^a   Olsson, Robin ^a   Collinson, Rebecca ^b   Pitsillides, Andrew A ^b   Shefelbine, Sandra ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; Bone strain; Digital image correlation; Loading; Mouse

Indexed keywords

BEAM THEORIES; BONE REMODELLING; BONE RESPONSE; BONE SURFACE; COMPRESSIVE LOADING; CONTRALATERAL CONTROL; CORTICAL BONE; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATIONS; HIGH STRAINS; ISOLATED AREAS; KNEE JOINT; LOCAL STRAINS; MOUSE; NON-UNIFORM STRAIN; PEAK STRAINS; SPECKLE PATTERNS; STANDARD DEVIATION; STRUCTURAL ADAPTATION; SURFACE STRAINS;

BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOINTS (ANATOMY); MAMMALS; STRAIN; STRAIN MEASUREMENT; TISSUE;

LOADING;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION; DIGITAL IMAGING; MALE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; C57BL MOUSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIBIA;

EID: 77952490622     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.042     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bay B.K. Texture correlation: a method for the measurement of detailed strain distributions within trabecular bone. J. Orthop. Res. 1995, 13(2):258-267.
2. Carter D.R. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1984, 36(Suppl 1):S19-S24.
3. Cullen D.M., Smith R.T., Akhter M.P. Bone-loading response varies with strain magnitude and cycle number. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 91(5):1971-1976.
4. Currey J.D. The effects of drying and re-wetting on some mechanical properties of cortical bone. J. Biomech. 1988, 21(5):439-441.
5. De Souza R.L., Matsuura M., Eckstein F., Rawlinson S.C., Lanyon L.E., Pitsillides A.A. Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: a new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element. Bone 2005, 37(6):810-818.
6. Forwood M.R., Bennett M.B., Blowers A.R., Nadorfi R.L. Modification of the in vivo four-point loading model for studying mechanically induced bone adaptation. Bone 1998, 23(3):307-310.
7. Frost H.M. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell Evol. Biol. 2003, 275(2):1081-1101.
8. Gross T.S., Edwards J.L., McLeod K.J., Rubin C.T. Strain gradients correlate with sites of periosteal bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12(6):982-988.
9. Gross T.S., Srinivasan S., Liu C.C., Clemens T.L., Bain S.D. Noninvasive loading of the murine tibia: an in vivo model for the study of mechanotransduction. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2002, 17(3):493-501.
10. Hardisty M.R., Whyne C.M. Whole bone strain quantification by image registration: a validation study. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131(6). 64502-1:6.
11. Hoc T., Henry L., Verdier M., Aubry D., Sedel L., Meunier A. Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of Haversian cortical bone. Bone 2006, 38(4):466-474.
12. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Grootenboer H.J., Dalstra M., Fudala B., Slooff T.J. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J. Biomech. 1987, 20(11-12):1135-1150.
13. Judex S., Gross T.S., Zernicke R.F. Strain gradients correlate with sites of exercise-induced bone-forming surfaces in the adult skeleton. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12(10):1737-1745.
14. Kahn-Jetter Z., Chu T. Three-dimensional displacement measurements using digital image correlation and photogrammetric analysis. Exp. Mech. 1990, 30(1):10-16.
15. Knothe Tate M.L., Steck R., Forwood M.R., Niederer P. In vivo demonstration of load-induced fluid flow in the rat tibia and its potential implications for processes associated with functional adaptation. J. Exp. Biol. 2000, 203(Part 18):2737-2745.
16. LaMothe J.M., Hamilton N.H., Zernicke R.F. Strain rate influences periosteal adaptation in mature bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 2005, 27(4):277-284.
17. Lee K.C., Maxwell A., Lanyon L.E. Validation of a technique for studying functional adaptation of the mouse ulna in response to mechanical loading. Bone 2002, 31(3):407-412.
18. Linde F., Sorensen H.C. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 1993, 26(10):1249-1252.
19. Lucksanasombool P., Higgs W.A., Higgs R.J., Swain M.V. Fracture toughness of bovine bone: influence of orientation and storage media. Biomaterials 2001, 22(23):3127-3132.
20. Mosley J.R., Lanyon L.E. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone 1998, 23(4):313-318.
21. Mosley J.R., Lanyon L.E. Growth rate rather than gender determines the size of the adaptive response of the growing skeleton to mechanical strain. Bone 2002, 30(1):314-319.
22. Mosley J.R., March B.M., Lynch J., Lanyon L.E. Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. Bone 1997, 20(3):191-198.
23. Nicolella D.P., Bonewald L.F., Moravits D.E., Lankford J. Measurement of microstructural strain in cortical bone. Eur. J. Morphol. 2005, 42(1-2):23-29.
24. Nicolella D.P., Nicholls A.E., Lankford J., Davy D.T. Machine vision photogrammetry: a technique for measurement of microstructural strain in cortical bone. J. Biomech. 2001, 34(1):135-139.
25. Robling A.G., Duijvelaar K.M., Geevers J.V., Ohashi N., Turner C.H. Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. Bone 2001, 29(2):105-113.
26. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling. J. Theor. Biol. 1984, 107(2):321-327.
27. Stevens H.Y., Meays D.R., Frangos J.A. Pressure gradients and transport in the murine femur upon hindlimb suspension. Bone 2006, 39(3):565-572.
28. Thompson M.S., Schell H., Lienau J., Duda G.N. Digital image correlation: a technique for determining local mechanical conditions within early bone callus. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007, 29(7):820-823.
29. Verhulp E., van Rietbergen B., Huiskes R. A three-dimensional digital image correlation technique for strain measurements in microstructures. J. Biomech. 2004, 37(9):1313-1320.
30. Yang L., Zhang P., Liu S., Samala P.R., Su M., Yokota H. Measurement of Strain Distributions in Mouse Femora with 3D-Digital Speckle Pattern Interferometry. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2007, 45(8):843-851.
31. Zhang D., Arola D.D. Applications of digital image correlation to biological tissues. J. Biomed. Opt. 2004, 9(4):691-699.
32. Zhang J., Jin G.C., Meng L.B., Jian L.H., Wang A.Y., Lu S.B. Strain and mechanical behavior measurements of soft tissues with digital speckle method. J. Biomed. Opt. 2005, 10(3):034021.