MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: Kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 196, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1450-1456

  Kim, Jeong Ah ^a   Son, Eun Ju ^a   Youk, Ji Hyun ^a   Kim, Eun Kyung ^a   Kim, Min Jung ^a   Kwak, Jin Young ^a   Jeong, Joon ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Dynamic MRI; Kinetic characteristics; MRI

Indexed keywords

EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER MORPHOLOGY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 79960549872     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5027     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:906-920 (Pubitemid 38868137)
2. Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman JR, et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Lancet 1995; 345:1154-1157
3. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:1546-1554 (Pubitemid 35277278)
4. May DS, Lee NC, Nadel MR, Henson RM, Miller DS. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. AJR 1998; 170:97-104 (Pubitemid 28130583)
5. Evans A. The diagnosis and management of preinvasive breast disease: radiological diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res 2003; 5:250-253
6. Ikeda DM, Andersson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology 1989; 172:661-666 (Pubitemid 19211578)
7. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420 (Pubitemid 27051736)
8. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8469-8476
9. Londero V, Zuiani C, Furlan A, Nori J, Bazzocchi M. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Radiol Med 2007; 112:863-876 (Pubitemid 350155013)
10. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849
11. Schouten van der Velden AP, Boetes C, Bult P, Wobbes T. The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 2006; 192:172-178
12. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007; 370:485-492 (Pubitemid 47214635)
13. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007; 245:684-691 (Pubitemid 350127338)
14. Neubauer H, Li M, Keuhne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. Br J Radiol 2003; 76:3-12 (Pubitemid 36236293)
15. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E, et al. Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast. JBR-BTR 2005; 88:225-232 (Pubitemid 41639589)
16. D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BIRADS - Breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
17. Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bone B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003; 44:379-386
18. Furman-Haran E, Schechtman E, Kelez F, Kirshenbaum K, Degani H. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional diversity of the vasculature in benign and malignant breast lesions. Cancer 2005; 104:708-718 (Pubitemid 41113669)
19. Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:1875-1887 (Pubitemid 23004615)
20. Santinelli A, Baccarini M, Colanzi P, Fabris G. Microvessel quantitation in intraductal and early invasive breast carcinomas. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2000; 22:277-284 (Pubitemid 30647315)
21. Guidi AJ, Fischer L, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86:614-619 (Pubitemid 24143171)
22. Brix G, Semmler W, Port R, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:621-628
23. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:260-266 (Pubitemid 29463108)
24. Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1353-1360 (Pubitemid 40983517)
25. Claus EB, Chu P, Howe CL, et al. Pathobiologic findings in DCIS of the breast: morphologic features, angiogenesis, Her-2/neu and hormone receptors. Exp Mol Pathol 2001; 70:303-316 (Pubitemid 32607203)
26. Zafrani B, Leroyer A, Fourquet A, et al. Mammographically- detected ductal in situ carcinoma of the breast analyzed with a new classification: a study of 127 cases - correlation with estrogen and progesterone receptors, p53 and c-erbB-2 proteins, and proliferative activity. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11:208-214 (Pubitemid 24308081)
27. Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G. Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30:959-965 (Pubitemid 33049022)
28. Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:269-280
29. Hashimoto BE, Kramer DJ, Picozzi VJ. High detection rate of breast ductal carcinoma in situ calcifications on mammographically directed high resolution sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:501-508 (Pubitemid 32435908)
30. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Kwon GY, Gong G, Cho OK. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features. AJR 2008; 190:516-525 (Pubitemid 351196626)