Daily patterns of communication and contact between Italian early adolescents and their friends

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 14, Issue 7-8, 2011, Pages 467-471

  Baiocco, Roberto ^a   Laghi, Fiorenzo ^a   Schneider, Barry H ^b   Dalessio, Maria ^a   Amichai Hamburger, Yair ^c   Coplan, Robert J ^d   Koszycki, Diana ^b   Flament, Martine ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

^d CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ITALY; LONELINESS; MALE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; ITALY; LONELINESS; MALE; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 79960546507     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0208     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benenson JF, Apostolaris NH, Parnass J. Age and sex differences in dyadic and group interaction. Developmental Psychology 1997; 33:538-543.
2. McKenna KYA, Bargh JA. Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2000; 4:57-75.
3. van den Eijnden RJJM, Meerkerk G, Vermulst A, et al. Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents. A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 2008; 44:655-665.
4. Milani L, Osualdella D, Di Blasio P. Quality of interpersonal relationships and problematic Internet use in adolescence. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:681-684.
5. Leung L. Stressful life events, motives for Internet use and social support among digital kids. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:204-214. (Pubitemid 46789692)
6. Valkenburg P, Peter J. Preadolescents? and adolescents? online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 2007; 43:267-277.
7. Peter J, Valkenberg PM, Schouten AP. Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2005; 8:423-430. (Pubitemid 41540926)
8. Ma ML, Leung L. Unwillingness-to-communicate, perceptions of hte Internet and self-disclosue in ICQ. Telematics and Informatics 2005; 23:22-37. (Pubitemid 41475535)
9. Bukowski WM, Hoza B, Boivin M. Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1994; 11:471-484.
10. Mesch GS. Social relationships and Internet use among adolescents in Israel. Social Science Quarterly 2001; 82:329-339.
11. Wolak J, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D. Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of adolescents who form close on-line relationships. Journal of Adolescence 2003; 26:105-119. (Pubitemid 36503759)
12. Bryant JA, Sanders-Jackson AS, Smallwood AM. Iming, text messaging and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006; 11:577-592.
13. Valkenberg PM, Peter J. The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents? existing friendships. Journal of Communication 2009; 59:79-97.
14. Reis HT, Gosling SD. (2010) Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. In Fiske S, Gilbert D, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 82-114.
15. Richards M, Crowe P, Larson R, et al. Developmental patterns and gender differences in the experience of peer companionship during adolescence. Child Development 1998; 69:154-163. (Pubitemid 128453699)
16. Alsaker F, Flammer A. (1998) The adolescent experience of European and American adolescents in the 1990s. Hillsadle, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Bricolo F, Gentile DA, Smelse RL, et al. Use of the computer and Internet among Italian families: First national study. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:789-797. (Pubitemid 350275705)
18. Sandstrom MJ, Cillessen AHN. Sociometric status and children?s peer experiences: Use of the daily diary method. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2003; 49:427-452. (Pubitemid 37291577)
19. Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment 1996; 66:20-40. (Pubitemid 26057135)
20. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. (2001) Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Vakil S, Freeman R, Swim TJ. The Reggio-Emilia approach and inclusive early childhood programs. Early Childhood Education Journal 2003; 30:187-192. (Pubitemid 36165776)
22. Schneider BH, Tomada G, Normand S, et al. Social support as a predictor of school bonding and academic motivation following the transition to Italian middle school. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2008; 25:287-310.
23. Amichai-Hamburger Y, Ben-Artzi E. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior 2003; 19:71-80. (Pubitemid 35460104)