Inventional repertoires and written messages

Communication Studies

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 220-234

  Hample, Dale ^a   Gordy, Christopher ^b   Sellie, Alison ^b   Wright, Michaela ^b   Zanolla, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Goals Plan Action; Invention; Message Production; Repertoire

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960543553     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510970802257630     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berger, C. R., (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C., (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Burleson, B. R., & Caplan, S. E., (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J. C., McCroskey, J. A., Daly, M. M., Martin, & M. J., Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 233–286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
4. Burleson, B. R., & Waltman, M. S., (1988). Cognitive complexity: Using the Role Category Questionnaire measure. In C. H., Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication (pp. 1–36). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Dillard, J. P., (2004). The goals-plans-action model of interpersonal influence. In J. S., Seiter & R. H., Gass (Eds.), Perspective on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 185–206). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Dillard, J. P., & Solomon, D. H., (2000). Conceptualizing context in message-production research. Communication Theory, 10, 167–175.
7. Greene, J. O., (Ed.). (1997a). Message production: Advances in communication theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Greene, J. O., (1997b). A second generation action assembly theory. In J. O., Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 151–170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Hample, D., (2000). Cognitive editing of arguments and reasons for requests: Evidence from think-aloud protocols. Argumentation and Advocacy, 37, 98–108.
10. Hample, D., (2004, May). Inventional capacity: Conceptualization, operationalization, and findings. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
11. Hample, D., (2005a). Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Hample, D., (2005b). Inventional capacity. In F. H., van Eemeren & P., Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 337–348). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishers.
13. Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M., (1990). Arguers as editors. Argumentation, 4, 153–169.
14. Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S., (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 72–80.
15. Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S., (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggression: A review of recent theory and research. Communication Yearbook, 19, 319–351.
16. Kellermann, K., Broetzmann, S., Lim, T.-S., & Kitao, K., (1989). The conversation MOP: Scenes in the stream of discourse. Discourse Processes, 12, 27–61.
17. Lambert, B. L., & Gillespie, J. L., (1994). Patient perceptions of pharmacy students' hypertension compliance-gaining messages: Effects of message design logic and content themes. Health Communication, 6, 311–325.
18. Meyer, J. R., (1997). Cognitive influences on the ability to address interaction goals. In J. O., Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 71–90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H., (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
20. O'Keefe, B. J., (1988). The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55, 80–103.
21. O'Keefe, B. J., & Lambert, B. L., (1995). Managing the flow of ideas: A local management approach to message design. Communication Yearbook, 18, 54–82.
22. Rancer, A. S., & Avtgis, T. A., (2006). Argumentative and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Stevens, J. P., (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (, 4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.