Evaluation of potential outcome predictors in type II endoleak: A retrospective study with CT angiography feature analysis

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 197, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 234-240

  Keedy, Alexander W ^a   Yeh, Benjamin M ^a   Kohr, Jennifer R ^a   Hiramoto, Jade S ^b   Schneider, Darren B ^b   Breiman, Richard S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical outcome; CT angiography; Type II endoleak

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM SURGERY; AORTA GRAFT; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOLEAK; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENT;

ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79960534659     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4566     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364:843-848
2. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1607-1618 (Pubitemid 39350421)
3. Buth J, van Marrewijk CJ, Harris PL, Hop WC, Riambau V, Laheij RJ. Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: a report on the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:211-221
4. Hayter CL, Bradshaw SR, Allen RJ, Guduguntla M, Hardman DT. Follow-up costs increase the cost disparity between endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42:912-918 (Pubitemid 41571958)
5. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, Schwarten D, Fogarty TJ. Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32:90-107
6. Parent FN, Meier GH, Godziachvili V, et al. The incidence and natural history of type I and II endoleak: a 5-year follow-up assessment with color duplex ultrasound scan. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:474-481 (Pubitemid 44718590)
7. Mandziak DM, Stanley BM, Foreman RK, Walsh JA, Burnett JR. Outcome of endoleak following endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74:1039-1042 (Pubitemid 40006985)
8. Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T, et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:1029-1035 (Pubitemid 44718580)
9. van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Harris PL, Norgren L, Nevelsteen A, Wyatt MG. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:461-473 (Pubitemid 46098519)
10. Resch T, Ivancev K, Lindh M, et al. Persistent collateral perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair does not lead to progressive change in aneurysm diameter. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28:242-249 (Pubitemid 28377975)
11. Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:23-29 (Pubitemid 44725764)
12. Rhee SJ, Ohki T, Veith FJ, Kurvers H. Current status of management of type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17:335-344 (Pubitemid 36687587)
13. Tolia AJ, Landis R, Lamparello P, Rosen R, Macari M. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: natural history. Radiology 2005; 235:683-686 (Pubitemid 40571114)
14. van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, Harris PL, Buth J. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during followup. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27:128-137 (Pubitemid 38111678)
15. Bargellini I, Napoli V, Petruzzi P, et al. Type II lumbar endoleaks: hemodynamic differentiation by contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning and influence on aneurysm enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41:10-18 (Pubitemid 40193333)
16. Timaran CH, Ohki T, Rhee SJ, et al. Predicting aneurysm enlargement in patients with persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39:1157-1162 (Pubitemid 38952580)
17. Dias NV, Ivancev K, Malina M, Resch T, Lindblad B, Sonesson B. Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39:1229-1235 (Pubitemid 38952589)
18. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 163:670-675
19. Steinmetz E, Rubin BG, Sanchez LA, et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39:306-313 (Pubitemid 38174311)
20. Fan CM, Rafferty EA, Geller SC, et al. Endovascular stent-graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the relationship between patent vessels that arise from the aneurysmal sac and early endoleak. Radiology 2001; 218:176-182