Formalization of technical functions: Why is that so difficult?

Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, TMCE 2010

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 155-165

  Kroes, Peter ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Formal representation of functional features; Function assignment; Functional modelling; Functional versus physical features; Intrinsic versus mind dependent features; Investigation of technical functions

Indexed keywords

FUNCTION ASSIGNMENT; FUNCTIONAL FEATURES; FUNCTIONAL MODELLING; INTRINSIC VERSUS MIND-DEPENDENT FEATURES; PHYSICAL FEATURES; TECHNICAL FUNCTIONS;

ENGINEERS;

EID: 79960527892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Chakrabarti, A., and Blessing, L., (1996), "Special issue: Representing functionality in design", Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 10, pp. 251-253.
2. Chandrasekaran, B., (2005), "Representing function: Relating functional representation and functional modelling streams", Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, Vol. 19, pp. 65-74.
3. De Ridder, J., (2007), "Reconstructing design, explaining artifacts; philosophical reflections on the design and explanation of technical artifacts", Delft University of Technology, Delft.
4. Eck, D.v., (2009), "On relating functional modeling approaches: abstracting functional models from behavioral models", Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
5. Eck, D.v., McAdams, D.A., and Vermaas, P.E., (2007), "Functional decomposition in engineering: a survey", Proceedings of the ASME IDETC/CIE2007, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 1-10.
6. Erden, M.S., Komoto, H., Beek, T.J.v., D'Amelio, V., Echavarria, E., and Tomiyama, T., (2008), "A review of function modeling: Approaches and applications", Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 22, pp. 147-169.
7. Houkes, W., and Meijers, A., (2006), "The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 37 (1), pp. 118-131.
8. Kroes, P., (2006), "Coherence of structural and functional descriptions of technical artefacts", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 37(1), pp. 137-151.
9. Kroes, P., (2002), "Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts", Design Studies, Vol. 23, pp. 287-302.
10. Kroes, P., and Meijers, A., (2006), "The dual nature of technical artefacts", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 37, pp. 1-4.
11. McLaughlin, P., (2001), "What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Meijers, A.W.M., (2001), "The relational ontology of technical artefacts", in: The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology Research in philosophy and technology, Vol 20 (series editor Carl Mitcham), Kroes, P.A., M., M.A.W. (Eds.), JAI/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 81-96.
13. Searle, J., (1995), "The Construction of Social Reality", Penguin Books, London.
14. Simon, H.A., (1996), "The Sciences of the Artificial", 3rd ed. ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Vermaas, P.E., and Houkes, W., (2003), "Ascribing functions to technical artefacts: A challenge to etiological accounts of functions", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 54 (2), pp. 261-289.
16. Wood, W.H., (2009), "Computational representations of functions in engineering design", in: Handbook of philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, Meijers, A. (Ed.), Elsevier, pp. 543-564.