A review of function modeling: Approaches and applications

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 147-169

  Erden, M S ^a   Komoto, H ^a   Van Beek, T J ^a   D'Amelio, V ^a   Echavarria, E ^a   Tomiyama, T ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Delft University of Technology   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behavior; Design; Function Modeling; Maintenance; Service

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; FUNCTION EVALUATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COMMONALITIES; FUNCTION MODELING (FM);

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 40849145518     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060408000103     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. America, P., & van Wijgerden, J. (2000). Requirements modeling for families of complex systems. IW-SAPF 3:3rd Inf. Workshop on Software Architecture for Product Families, Lecture Notes-in Computer Science, Vol. 1951. Berlin: Springer.
2. Arai, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2004). Proposal of service CAD system - a tool for service engineering. Annals of the CIRP 53(1), 397-400.
3. Arai, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2005). Service CAD system-evaluation and quantification. Annals of the CIRP 54(1). 463-166.
4. Balachandran, M., & Gero, J.S. (1990). Role of prototypes in integrated expert systems and CAD systems. In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V (Gero, J.S., Ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 195-211. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Bhatta, S., Goel, A., & Prabhakar, S. (1994). Innovation in analogical design: a model-based approach. Proc. Third Int. Conf Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID-94), pp. 57-74, Lausanne, Switzerland,
6. Bonnerna, G.M., & van Houten, F.J.A.M. (2006), Use of models in conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design 17(6), 549-562.
7. Bracewell, R.H., & Sharpe, J.E.E. (1996). Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation-Schemebuilder. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 333-346.
8. Browing, R. (2001). Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(3), 292-306.
9. Cagan, J., Campbell, M.I., Finger, S., & Tomiyama, T. (2005). A framework for conceptual design synthesis: model and applications. Journal of Computing and Informatic Science in Engineering 5(3), 171-181.
10. Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T.P. (2001). A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design. Design Studies 22, 493-517.
11. Chakrabarti. A., Sarkar. P., Leelavathamma, B., & Nataraju, B.S. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19, 113-132.
12. Chandrasekaran, B. (1994a), Functional representation and causal processes. Advances in Computers 38, 73-143.
13. Chandrasekaran, B. (1994b). Functional representations: a brief historical perspective. Applied Artificial Intelligence 8, 173-197.
14. Chandrasekaran, B. (2005). Representing function: relating functional representation and functional modeling research streams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19, 65-74.
15. Chandrasekaran, B., & Josephson, J.R. (2000). Function in device representation. Engineering With Computers 16, 162-177.
16. D'Amelio, V., & Tomiyama, T. (2007). Predicting the unpredicted problems in mechafronics design. Proc. ICED 200716th Int. Conf. Engineering Design.
17. De Kleer, J., & Brown, J.S. (1984), A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 24, 7-83.
18. Deng, Y.M. (2002). Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16, 343-362.
19. Deng, Y.M., Britten, G.A., & Tor, S.B. (2000), Constraint-based functional design verification for conceptual design. Computer-Aided. Design 32, 889-899.
20. Deng, Y.M., Tor, S.B., & Britton, G.A. (1999). A computerized design environment for functional modeling of mechanical products, Proc. 5th ACM Symp. Solid Modeling, pp. 1-12, Ann Arbor, MI.
21. Dorst, K., & Vermaas, P.E. (2005). John Gero's function-behaviour- structure model of designing: a critical analysis. Research in Engineering Design 16, 17-26.
22. Echavarria, E., Tomiyama, T., & van Bussel, G.J.W. (2007a). Fault diagnosis approach based on a model-based reasoner and a functional designer for a wind turbine. An approach towards self-maintenance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 75. http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1742-6596/75/1/012078
23. Echavarria, E., Tomiyama, T., & van Bussel, G.J.W. (20076). The concept of self-maintained offshore wind turbines. Proc. European Wind Energy Conf., Milan, Italy, May 7th-10th.
24. Far, B.H., & Elamy, A.H. (2005). Functional reasoning theories: problems and perspectives. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19, 75-88.
25. Forbus, K.D. (1984). Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence 24(3), 85-168.
26. Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26-36.
27. Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004), The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373-391.
28. Goel, A.K. (1991). A model-based approach to case adaptation. Proc. 13th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 143-148. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Goel, A.K., & Bhatta, S.R. (2004). Use of design patterns in analogy-based design. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18, 85-94.
30. Goel, A.K., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. Proc. 11th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), pp. 1388-1394. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
31. Goel, A.K., & Chandrasekharan, B. (1992). Case-based design: a task analysis. In A rtificial Intelligence Approaches to Engineering Design (Tong, C., & Sriram, D., Eds.), Vol. 2, pp. 165-184. San Diego, CA: Academic.
32. Keuneke, A., & Allemang, D. (1989). Exploring the no-function-in-structure principle. Journal, of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1(1), 79-89.
33. Keuneke, A.M. (1991). Device representation-the significance of functional knowledge. IEEE Expert 6(2), 22-25.
34. Kitamura, Y., Kashiwase, M., Fuse, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2004). Deployment of ontological framework of functional design knowledge. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2), 115-127.
35. Kitamura, Y., & Mizoguchi, R. (2003). Ontology-based description of functional design knowledge and its use in a functional way server. Expert Systems With Applications 24, 153-166.
36. Kitamura, Y., & Mizoguchi, R. (2004). Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge. Journal of Engineering Design 15(4), 327-351.
37. Klein, W.E., & Lalli. V.R. (1989). Model 0A Wind Turbine Generator FMEA. Cleveland, OH: NASA Glenn Research Center.
38. Kuipers, B. (1981. November). de Kleer and Brown's "Mental Models: " A Critique, Technical Report 17. Boston: Tufts University.
39. Kuipers, B. (1994). Qualitative Reasoning: Modeling and Simulation With Incomplete Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Labib, A.W. (2006). Next generation maintenance systems: towards the design of a self-maintenance machine. 2006 IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Informatics, pp. 213-217, Singapore.
41. Lee, W.S., Grosh, D.L., Tillman, F.A., & Lie, C.H. (1985). Fault tree analysis, methods, and applications - a review, IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-34(3), 194-203.
42. Miles, L.D. (1972). Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Muller, G. (2007). A multidisciplinary research approach, illustrated by the Boderc project. Accessed at http://www.gaudisite.nl
44. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
45. Rault, A. (1992). Mechatronics and bond graphs in the automotive industry. In Mechatronics, Pioneering or Self-Evident? (Scintilla, E.T.S.V., Ed.), pp. 68-77. Enschede: University of Twente.
46. Rausand, M. (1998), Reliability centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 60, 121-132.
47. Rausand, M., & Oien, K. (1996). The basic concepts of failure analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 58, 73-83.
48. Rodenacker, W. (1971). Methodisches Konstruieren. Berlin: Springer- Verlag.
49. Rosenberg, R., & Karnopp, D.C. (1983). Introduction to Physical System Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Shimomura, Y., Tanigawa, S., Umeda, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1995). Development of self-maintenance photocopiers. AI Magazine 16(4), 41-53.
51. Shimomura, Y., Yoshioko, M., Takeda, H., Umeda, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1998). Representation of design object based on the functional evolution process model. Journal of Mechanical Design 120, 221-229.
52. Snooke, N., & Price, C. (1998). Hierarchical functional reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 11, 301-309.
53. Suh, N.P. (1990). The Principle of Design. New York: Oxford University Press. Accessed at http://www.axiomaticdesign.com/
54. Szykman, S., Fenves, S.J., Keirouz, W., & Shooter, S.B. (2001), A foundation for interoperability in next-generation product development systems. Computer-Aided Design 33, 545-559.
55. Szykman, S., Raez, J., Bochenek, C., & Sriram, R.D. (2000). A web-based system for design artifact modeling. Design Studies 21, 145-165.
56. Tomiyama, T. (2006). Knowledge structure and complexity of multi-disciplinary design. Proc. 16th Int. CIRP Design Seminar 2006-Design & Innovation for a Sustainable Society: (Gu, P., Xue, D., Ramirez-Senano, A., Park, S., & Fletcher, D., Eds.), pp. 310-316. Alberta, Canada: Kananaskis.
57. Tomiyama, T., & D'Ameho, V., (2007a). Towards design interference detection to deal with complex design problems. The Future of Product Development, Proc. 17th CIRP Design Conf. (Krause, EL., Ed.), pp. 473-482. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
58. Tomiyama, T., & D'Amelio, V. (2001b). Complexity of multi-disciplinary product development and design interference detector. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Virtual Design and Automation VIDA.
59. Tomiyama, T., D'Amelio, V., Urbanic, J., & ElMaraghy, W. (2007). Complexity of multi-disciplinary design. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 56(1).
60. Tomiyama, T., & Meijer, B.R. (2005). Directions of next generation product development. In Advances in Design (ElMaraghy, H.A., & ElMaraghy, W.H., Eds.), pp, 27-35. London: Springer.
61. Tomiyama, T., Shimomura, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2004). A note on service design methodology. Proc. DETC'04, p. 57393, ASME.
62. Tomiyama, T., Umeda, Y., & Yoshikawa, H. (1993). A CAD for functional design. Annals of the CIRP 42(1), 143-146.
63. Tor, S.B., Deng, Y.M., & Britton, G.G. (1999). A comprehensive representation model for functional design of mechanical products. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Engineering Design, pp. 1929-1932, Munich, Germany.
64. Umeda, Y., Ishii, M., Yoshioka, M., Shimomura, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1996). Supporting conceptual design based on the functionbehavior-state modeller. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 275-288.
65. Umeda, Y., Kondoh, S., Shimomura, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (2005), Development of design methodology for upgradable products based on function-behavior-state modeling. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(3), 161-182.
66. Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., & Tomiyama, T. (1990), Function, behaviour, and structure. In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V (Gero, J.S., Ed.). pp. 177-193, Berlin: Computational Mechanics Publications/Springer-Verlag.
67. Umeda, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1995). FBS modeling: modeling scheme of function for conceptual design. Proc. Working Papers of the 9th Int. Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems, pp. 271 - 278, Amsterdam.
68. Umeda, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1997). Functional reasoning in design. IEEE Expert 12(2), 42-48.
69. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., & Yoshikawa, H. (1989). Model based diagnosis using qualitative physics. Computer Applications in Production and Engineering CAPE'89 (Kimura, F., & Rolstadas, A., Eds.), pp. 443-450. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
70. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., & Yoshikawa, H. (1995a). FBS modeling: modeling scheme of function for conceptual design. Proc. 9th Int. Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, pp. 271-278, Amsterdam, May 11-19.
71. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., & Yoshikawa, H. (1995b), Design methodology for self-maintenance machines. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 117(3), 355-362.
72. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., Yoshikawa, H., & Shimomura, Y. (1994). Using functional maintenance to improve fault tolerance, IEEE Expert, Intelligent Systems & Their Applications 9(3), 25-31.
73. Van Bussel, G. W., & Zaaijer, M.B. (2001 ). Reliability, availability and maintenance aspects of large-scale offshore wind farms, a concepts study. Proc. Int. Conf. Marine Renewable Energy, pp. 119-126. London: Institute of Marine Engineers, London.
74. Van Bussel, G.W., & Zaaijer, M.B. (2003). Estimation of Turbine Reliability Figures Within the DOWEC Project, Report No. 10048. Petten, The Netherlands: DOWEC
75. Van Wie, M., Bryant, C.R., Bohm, M.R., Mcadams, D.A., & Stone, R.B. (2005). A model of function-based representations. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19, 89-111.
76. Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., & Pardasam, A. (2002). Collaborative conceptual design-state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design 34, 981-996.
77. Welch, R.V., & Dixon, J.R. (1992). Representing function, behavior and structure during conceptual design. In Design Theory and Methodology-DTM'92 (Taylor, D.L., & Stauffer, L.A., Eds.), pp. 11-18. New York: ASME.
78. Welch, R.V., & Dixon, J.R. (1994). Guiding conceptual design through behavioral reasoning. Research in Engineering Design 6(3), 169-188.
79. Yaner, P.W.Y,. & Goel, A.K. (2006). From form to function: from SBF to DSSBF. In Design Computing and Cognition 2006 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 423-441. Berlin: Springer.
80. Yoshiaka, M., Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., Shimomura, Y., Nomaguchi, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (2004). Physical concept ontology for the knowledge intensive engineering framework. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2), 95-113.
81. Yoshioka, M., Nomaguchi, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (2001). Proposal of an integrated design support environment based on the model of synthesis. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. 2, pp. 1319-1328.
82. Yoshioka, M., Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., Shimomura, Y., Nomaguchi, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (2004). Physical concept ontology for the knowledge intensive engineering framework. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2), 69-127.