The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: A commentary

American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A

Volumn 155, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1777-1785

  Madeo, Anne C ^a   Biesecker, Barbara B ^a   Brasington, Campbell ^a   Erby, Lori H ^a   Peters, Kathryn F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cultural competency; Disability community; Editorial; Genetic counseling; Social change

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMMUNITY; DISABILITY; FEAR; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC DISORDER; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; NOTE; OCCUPATION; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; UNITED STATES;

DISABLED PERSONS; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PATIENT ADVOCACY;

EID: 79960485557     PISSN: 15524825     EISSN: 15524833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34054     Document Type: Note

References (77)

1. Ahmed S, Bryant L, Hewison J. 2007. 'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: Providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource. Health Expect 10: 309-320.
2. Alderson P. 2001. Down's syndrome: Cost, quality and value of life. Soc Sci Med 53: 627-638.
3. Anderson G. 1999. Nondirectiveness in prenatal diagnosis: Patients read between the lines. Nurs Ethics 6: 126-136.
4. Asch A. 2003. Disability, equality and prenatal testing: Contradictory or compatible? Fla State Univ Law Rev 30: 315-342.
5. Asch A, Fine M. 1984. Shared dreams: A left perspective on disability rights and reproductive rights. Radic Am 18: 51-58.
6. Bauer PE. 2005. The abortion debate no one wants to have. Washington Post, October 18, 2005.
7. Bellomo MA. 2009. The perspective of prenatal genetic counseling in the Down Syndrome advocacy community. Unpublished thesis, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia: University of South Carolina.
8. Brasington CK. 1996. Inclusion of a family life experience in educational training about Down syndrome during genetic counseling clinical rotations. J Genet Couns 5: 190.
9. Brasington CK. 2007. What I wish I knew then...reflections from personal experiences in counseling about Down syndrome. J Genet Couns 16: 731-734.
10. Brown EK, Dies KA, Sanborn E, Peters H, Milunsky JM, Whalen Campion M. 2009. Genetic counselors' perspectives on disability training and experience. J Genet Couns 18: 659-660.
11. Bryant L, Hewison JD, Green JM. 2005. Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination in women who have a sibling with Down's syndrome. J Reprod Infant Psych 23: 181-198.
12. Caplan A. 2009. George Tiller's legacy for genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 18: 407-408.
13. Chapman E. 2002. The social and ethical implications of changing medical technologies: The views of people living with genetic conditions. J Health Psychol 7: 195-206.
14. Chen EA, Schiffman JF. 2000. Attitudes toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis among a group of individuals with physical disabilities. J Genet Couns 9: 137-152.
15. Clarke A. 1991. Is non-directive genetic counseling possible? Lancet 338: 998-1001.
16. Cohen JS. 2009. Adaptation and Quality of Life Among Adults with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Unpublished thesis, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
17. Cooley WC, Graham ES, Moeschler JB, Graham JM. 1990. Reactions of mothers and medical professionals to a film about Down syndrome. Am J Dis Child 144: 1112-1116.
18. Edwards JG, Ferrante RF. 2009. Toward concurrence: Understanding prenatal screening and diagnosis of Down syndrome from the health professional and advocacy community perspectives.
19. Epstein C. 2003. Is modern genetics the new eugenics? Genet Med 5: 469-475.
20. Farrelly E, Cho MK, Erby L, Roter D, Stenzel A, Ormond KE. 2010. Genetic counselors and prenatal testing: Where is the discussion about disability? J Genet Couns 19: 671.
21. Freese J, Shostak S. 2009. Genetics and social inquiry. Annu Rev Sociol 35: 107-128.
22. Gerson MT. Trig's breakthrough. Washington Post, September 10, 2008.
23. Gettig E. 2009. A remembrance of Dr. George Tiller. J Genet Couns 18: 404-406.
24. Gollust SE, Thompson RE, Gooding HC, Biesecker BB. 2003. Living with achondroplasia in an average-sized world: An assessment of quality of life. Am J Med Genet Part A 120A: 447-458.
25. Harper DC. 1999. Social psychology of differences: Stigma, spread, and stereotypes in childhood. Rehabil Psychol 44: 131-144.
26. Helm DT, Miranda S, Chedd NA. 1998. Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: Mothers' reflections on supports needed from diagnosis to birth. Ment Retard 36: 55-61.
27. Hodgson JM, Gillam LH, Sahhar MA, Metcalfe SA. 2010. "Testing times, challenging choices": An Australian study of prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 19: 22-37.
28. Jonas J, Asch A, McIntosh N, Susswein L. 2003. An assessment of genetic counselor's attitudes towards disability. J Genet Couns 12: 566-567.
29. Kaplan D. 1993. Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36: 605-612.
30. Kessler S. 1992. Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VII. Thoughts on directiveness. J Genet Couns 1: 9-17.
31. Kessler S. 1997. Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Nondirectiveness revisited. Am J Med Genet 72: 164-171.
32. Knutson C, Amacker-North E. 1989. Practices and attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis by genetic counselors. Am J Hum Genet 45: A123.
33. Lalvani P. 2008. Mothers of children with Down syndrome: Constructing the sociocultural meaning of disability. Intellect Dev Disabil 46: 436-445.
34. Landsman GH. 1998. Reconstructing motherhood in the age of 'perfect' babies: Mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities. Signs J Women Cult Soc 24: 69-99.
35. Lardy E, Wilfond B, Biesecker B. 2003. Genetic counselors' descriptions of Down syndrome: Promoting informed choice for prenatal testing. J Genet Couns 12: 549.
36. Loik V, Schneider G, Natowicz M, Tsipis J. 1998. Educating each other: Conversation between genetic counselors and those with a personal or professional interest in disability awareness. J Genet Couns 7: 509.
37. McCarthy H. 2003. The disability rights movement: Experiences and perspectives of selected leaders in the disability community. Rehabil Counsel Bull 46: 209-223.
38. Michie M, Bron F, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. 1997. Nondirective genetic counseling: An empirical study. Am J Hum Genet 60: 40-47.
39. Morgan A, Jones D. 2009. Perceptions of service user and carer involvement in healthcare education and impact on students' knowledge and practice: A literature review. Med Teach 31: 82-95.
40. National Society of Genetic Counselors. 2010a. The National Society of Genetic Counselors releases statement regarding Kansas jury's conviction of Dr. George Tiller's murderer., accessed July 24, 2010.
41. National Society of Genetic Counselors. 2010b. National Society of Genetic Counselors Strategic Plan., accessed August 24, 2010.
42. National Society of Genetic Counselors. 2010c. Professional status survey: Work environment. Accessed November 1, 2010.
43. National Society of Genetic Counselors' Definition Task Force. 2006. A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' task force report. J Genet Couns 15: 77-83.
44. National Society of Genetic Counselors. 2005. Vision and mission statement., accessed November 1, 2010.
45. National Society of Genetic Counselors. 2006. The code of ethics of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 15: 309-311.
46. National Society of Genetic Counselors. 2009. National Society of Genetic Counselors releases statement on murder of Dr. George Tiller., accessed July 24, 2010.
47. Ormond KE, Gill CJ, Semik P, Kirschner KL. 2003. Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: Issues of access, health care communication, and decision making. J Genet Couns 12: 333-349.
48. Parens E, Asch A. 1999. The disability rights critique of prenatal testing: Reflections and recommendations. Hastings Cent Rep 29: S1-S22.
49. Parens E, Asch A. 2003. The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. MRDD Res Rev 9: 40-47.
50. Patterson A, Satz M. 2002. Genetic counseling and the disabled: Feminism examines the stance of those who stand at the gate. Hypatia 17: 118-142.
51. Paul DB. 1998. Genetic services, economics and eugenics. Sci Context 11: 481-491.
52. Peters KF, Kong F, Hanslo M, Biesecker BB. 2002. Living with Marfan syndrome III. Quality of life and reproductive planning. Clin Genet 62: 110-120.
53. Petersen A. 2006. The best experts: The narratives of those who have a genetic condition. Soc Sci Med 63: 32-42.
54. Presidential Address. 2011. J Genet Couns 20: 1-4.
55. Rapp R. 2000. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
56. Raz A. 2004. 'Important to test, important to support': Attitudes toward disability rights and prenatal diagnosis among leaders of support groups in Israel. Soc Sci Med 59: 1857-1866.
57. Repper J, Breeze J. 2007. User and carer involvement in the training and education of health professionals: A review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 44: 511-519.
58. Resta R. 1992. The twisted helix: An essay on genetic counselors, eugenics, and social responsibility. J Genet Couns 1: 227-243.
59. Resta R. 1997. Eugenics and nondirectiveness in genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 6: 255-258.
60. Roberts CD, Stough LM, Parrish LH. 2002. The role of genetic counseling in the elective termination of pregnancies involving fetuses with disabilities. J Spec Educ 36: 48-55.
61. Roggenbuck J, Olson JE, Sellers TA, Ludowese C. 2000. Perception of genetic risk among genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 9: 47-59.
62. Roter D, Ellington L, Erby LH, Larson S, Dudley W. 2006. The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): Models of practice. Am J Med Genet Part C 142C: 209-220.
63. Saxton M. 1992. The people with disabilities caucus present recommendations for genetics professionals. Genet Resour 6: 84-85.
64. Shakespeare T. 1999. 'Losing the plot'? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability. Sociol Health Illn 21: 669-688.
65. Shakespeare T, Iezzoni LI, Groce NE. 2009. The art of medicine: Disability and the training of health professionals. Lancet 74: 1815-1816.
66. Skotko BG, Kishnani PS, Capone GT, for the Down Syndrome Diagnosis Study Group. 2009. Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: How best to deliver the news. Am J Med Genet Part A 149A: 2361-2367.
67. Suter SM. 2002. The routinization of prenatal testing. Am J Law Med 28: 233-270.
68. Teicher J, Tsipis J, Wertz DC, Lerner B. 1998. Disability awareness training in the graduate genetic counseling training program: A survey of recent graduates. J Genet Couns 7: 498.
69. Ward L, Howarth J, Rodgers J. 2002. Difference and choice: Exploring prenatal testing and the use of genetic information with people with learning difficulties. Brit J Learn Disab 30: 50-555.
70. Weil J. 2003. Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: A point of view. J Genet Couns 12: 199-211.
71. Weil J, Hodgson J. 2007. Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling sessions: Identifying tensions and developing strategies. Workshop presented at the National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Education Conference, October 2007.
72. Wertz DC. 1998. What's missing from genetic counseling: A survey of 476 counseling sessions. J Genet Couns 7: 499-500.
73. Wertz DC, Gregg R. 2000. Genetics services in a social, ethical and policy context: A collaboration between consumers and providers. J Med Ethics 26: 261-265.
74. Will G, Golly, what did Jon do? Newsweek January 29, 2007.
75. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. 2002. Is non-directiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing? Soc Sci Med 54: 339-347.
76. Wolff G, Jung C. 1995. Nondirectiveness and genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 4: 3-26.
77. Yuker HE. 1988. The effects of contact on attitudes toward disabled persons: Some empirical generalizations. In: Yuker HE, editor. Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer. pp 262-274.