Notionalization: The Transformation of Descriptions into Categorizations

Human Studies

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 155-181

  Deppermann, Arnulf ^a  

^a INSTITUT FÜR DEUTSCHE SPRACHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Categorization; Conversation analysis; Formulation; Interactional semantics; Notionalization

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960448003     PISSN: 01638548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10746-011-9186-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alm, M. (2007). Also darüber lässt sich ja streiten! Die Analyse von also in der Diskussion zu Diskurs- und Modalpartikeln. - So you can argue about this! The analysis of also in the discussion of discourse and modal particles. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
2. Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 107-123). Cambridge: CUP.
3. Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 627-647.
4. Barnes, R. K. (2007). Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk. Text and Talk, 27(3), 273-296.
5. Bilmes, J. (1981). Proposition and confrontation in a legal discussion. Semiotica, 34(3/4), 251-275.
6. Bilmes, J. (2008). Generally speaking. Formulating an argument in the U. S. Federal Trade Commission. Text & Talk, 28(2), 193-217.
7. Bilmes, J. (this volume). Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk. Human Studies, 34(2).
8. Bolden, G. (2010). 'Articulation the unsaid' via and-prefaced formulations of others' talk. Discourse Studies, 12(1), 5-32.
9. Bowles, H., & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.). (2007). Conversation analysis and language for specific purposes. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
10. Deppermann, A. (2011, this volume). The study of formulations as a key to an interactional semantics. Human Studies. doi: 10. 1007/s10746-011-9187-8.
11. Deppermann, A., & Spranz-Fogasy, T. (1998). Kommunikationsstörungen durch den Gesprächsprozeß. Zur Entstehung von Interaktionsdilemmata durch zeitliche Komplexierung-Troubles in communication by the process of interaction. How interactional dilemmata emerge by temporal complexities-. In R. Fiehler (Ed.), Verständigungsprobleme und gestörte Kommunikation-Problems and troubles in communication (pp. 44-62). Opladen: Westdeutscher.
12. Drew, P. (2003). Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings. In P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction (pp. 293-308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in language. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 451-473). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Eichinger, L. (2000). Deutsche Wortbildung -German word-formation-. Tübingen: Narr.
15. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news. London: Routledge.
16. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical action. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 338-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
19. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 95-117). London: Academic.
20. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language (pp. 123-162). New York: Irvington.
21. Husserl, E. (1982[1913]). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.
22. Hutchby, I. (2005). "Active listening": Formulations and the elicitation of feelings talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 303-329.
23. Kallmeyer, W., & Keim, I. (1994). Bezeichnungen, Typisierung und soziale Kategorien-Nominations, typification, and social categories-. In W. Kallmeyer (Ed.), Exemplarische Analysen des Sprachverhaltens in Mannheim-Exemplary analyses of the linguistic behaviour in Mannheim- (pp. 318-386). Berlin: de Gruyter.
24. Konerding, K.-P. (2004). Semantische Variation, Diskurspragmatik, historische Entwicklung und Grammatikalisierung. Das Phänomenspektrum der Partikel also. -Semantic variation, discourse pragmatics, historical development, and grammaticalization. The phenomenal spectrum of the particle also. -In I. Pohl & K.-P. Konerding (Eds.), Stabilität und Flexibilität in der Semantik (pp. 199-240). -Stability and flexibility in semantics-. Frankfurt/Main: Lang.
25. Kress, G., & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26. Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
27. Rae, J. (2008). Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen, & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 62-79). Cambridge: CUP.
28. Rathert, M., & Alexaiou, A. (Eds.). (2010). The semantics of nominalization. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
29. Roelcke, T. (2005). Fachsprachen -Languages for special purposes. Berlin: Schmidt.
30. Rosch, E. H. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Schütz, A. (1967[1932]). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.
32. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., et al. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung, 10, 353-402. http://www. gespraechsforschung-ozs. de/heft2009/heft2009. htm, last accessed 13 June 2011.
33. Smith, D. (1978). K is mentally ill: The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12, 23-53.