New classification system of radical hysterectomy: Emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 264-268

  Cibula, D ^a   Abu Rustum, N R ^b   Benedetti Panici, P ^c   Kohler C ^d   Raspagliesi, F ^e   Querleu, D ^f,g   Morrow, C P ^h  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^e NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^g MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Nerve sparing; Radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; HYPOGASTRIC PLEXUS; MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; UTERINE ARTERY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; UTERUS;

EID: 79960440681     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. D. Querleu, and C.P. Morrow Classification of radical hysterectomy Lancet Oncol 9 2008 297 303 (Pubitemid 351722949)
2. F. Landoni, A. Maneo, G. Cormio, P. Perego, R. Milani, O. Caruso, and C. Mangioni Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study Gynecol Oncol 80 2001 3 12 (Pubitemid 32062080)
3. D. Cibula, P. Velechovska, J. Sláma, D. Fischerova, I. Pinkavova, and D. Pavlista Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy Gynecol Oncol 116 2010 506 511
4. A. Ditto, F. Martinelli, F. Hanozet, C. Reato, E. Solima, and F. Zanaboni Class III NSRH: oncological outcome in 170 cervical cancer patients Gynecol Oncol 119 2010 192 197
5. M. Possover, S. Stober, K. Plaul, and A. Schneider Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III Gynecol Oncol 79 2000 154 157
6. A. Ercoli, V. Delmas, P. Gadonneix, F. Fanfani, R. Villet, P. Paparella, S. Manusco, and G. Scambia Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves Surg Radiol Anat 25 2003 200 206 (Pubitemid 37322004)
7. J.B. Trimbos, C.P. Maas, M.C. Deruiter, A.A. Peters, and G.G. Kenter A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients Int J Gynecol Cancer 11 2001 180 186 (Pubitemid 32622663)
8. T. Kato, G. Murakami, and Y. Yabuki Does the cardinal ligament of the uterus contain a nerve that should be preserved in radical hysterectomy? Anat Sci Int 77 2002 161 168
9. A. Katahira, H. Niikura, K. Ito, T. Takano, S. Nagase, G. Murakami, and N. Yaegashi Vesicouterine ligament contains abundant autonomic nerve ganglion cells: the distribution in histology concerning nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy Int J Gynecol Cancer 18 2008 193 198
10. L. Palfalvi, and L. Ungar Laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP), the technique for radical pelvic side wall dissection: feasibility, technique and results Int J Gynecol Cancer 13 2003 914 917 (Pubitemid 38235243)
11. F. Raspagliesi, A. Ditto, R. Fontanelli, F. Zanaboni, E. Solima, and G. Spatti Type II versus Type III nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions Gynecol Oncol 102 2006 256 262 (Pubitemid 44041639)
12. D. Cibula, J. Sláma, P. Velechovská, D. Fischerova, M. Zikán, I. Pinkavová, and M. Hill Factors affecting spontaneous voiding recovery after radical hysterectomy Int J Gynecol Cancer 20 2010 685 690